[D.1. Hold public hearing, discuss, consider and act to make a recommendation to Town Council regarding amendments to Ordinances 703 and 720, as amended (which includes the Development Plan for the PD1-2 [Westlake Entrada] zoning district). Amendments to the Development Plan, specifically Westlake Entrada Blocks B, K, L (Lots 1 and 2), P, Q, and Westlake/Southlake Park Addition No.1 Block 1, Lot 2R1, Tarrant County, Texas. The properties are generally located east of Davis Blvd., south of State Highway 114, and north of Solana Boulevard.]

ITEM D ONE.

HOLD THE PUBLIC HEARING.

DISCUSS, CONSIDER AND ACT TO MAKE A RECOMMENDATION TO TOWN COUNCIL REGARDING AMENDMENTS TO ORDINANCES 703 AND 720, AS AMENDED, WHICH INCLUDES THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE PD 1-2 WESTLAKE ENTRADA ZONING DISTRICT AMENDMENTS TO THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN, SPECIFICALLY WESTLAKE ENTRATA BLOCKS B, K, L LOTS ONE AND TWO, P, Q AND WESTLAKE.

SOUTH LAKE PARK, ADDITION NUMBER ONE, BLOCK ONE, LOT 2R1.

TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS.

THE PROPERTIES ARE GENERALLY LOCATED EAST OF DAVIS BOULEVARD, SOUTH OF STATE HIGHWAY 114, AND NORTH OF SOLANA BOULEVARD.

SO, STAFF, DO WE HAVE A PRESENTATION? YES, SIR. WELCOME. YOU FOUGHT THROUGH THE TRAFFIC AND THE ACCIDENT AND GOT HERE ON TIME.

THANK YOU, CHAIRMAN AND COMMISSIONERS.

GOOD AFTERNOON.

SO THIS NEXT ITEM OR THE FIRST ITEM FOR YOU THIS EVENING IS THE AMENDMENT TO THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR ENTRADA.

DO I NEED TO TURN IT ON? IT IS ON. THANK YOU.

ALL RIGHT, SO THIS FIRST EXHIBIT IS AN EXHIBIT THAT THE APPLICANT PUT TOGETHER, AND CAN YOU PLEASE PULL THE MIC JUST A LITTLE BIT CLOSER? THANK YOU. IS THAT BETTER? HOW'S THAT? THAT'S PERFECT.

OKAY. WONDERFUL.

SO THIS FIRST EXHIBIT.

THERE'S A LITTLE BIT OF A DELAY.

SO I'LL GO AHEAD AND START WITH THIS ONE.

THIS IS AN EXHIBIT THAT THE APPLICANT HAS PUT TOGETHER THAT IDENTIFIES THE CERTAIN BLOCKS WITHIN THE OVERALL DEVELOPMENT THAT WE ARE LOOKING TO AMEND ON THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN.

IT IS A BLOCK P, B, Q AND K, AND I'LL GET INTO MORE OF THE DETAIL LATER, BUT IT'S A GREAT REPRESENTATION OF WHAT'S CHANGING OR WHAT'S BEING PROPOSED TO CHANGE AND WHAT IS STAYING THE SAME OR HAS ALREADY DEVELOPED, AND I'M HAVING TROUBLE. THERE WE GO.

THANK YOU. SO, AND THEN THIS ONE IS THE EXISTING DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE ENTRADA DEVELOPMENT, AND THIS IS THE SAME ONE YOU SAW A MOMENT AGO WITHOUT ALL OF THE LABELS AND WITH THE DETAILS OF WHAT'S BEING REQUESTED ON EACH OF THOSE BLOCKS, AND WE ARE ALSO ADDING IN THE PHASE THREE THAT WAS APPROVED WITH ORDINANCE 944, WHICH IS THE WESTLAKE SOUTHLAKE PARK ADDITION AND SO WE'LL JUST DIVE RIGHT INTO A BLOCK B.

ON THE LEFT IS THE PROPOSED APPLICATION, AND ON THE RIGHT SHOWS THE EXISTING DEVELOPMENT PLAN, AND ON THE LEFT YOU CAN SEE THEY ARE STILL PROPOSING THE EXISTING HOTEL.

THERE'S AN ADDITIONAL HOTEL OPTION ALONG THE SOUTHERN PORTION OF THIS BLOCK.

[00:05:01]

THE EASTERN SECTION IS TO BE THE COMMERCIAL MIXED USE WITH COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL OPTION, AND I BELIEVE THAT'S ALL THAT'S CHANGING ON THAT PARTICULAR BLOCK.

THERE'S A COLOR CODE UP AT THE TOP RIGHT THAT CORRESPONDS TO THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN YOUR AGENDA PACKET.

THE NEXT ONE IS BLOCK K.

THIS IS THE ORIGINAL ONE THAT HAS THE PLAZA MAYOR, AND THIS ONE IS BEING PROPOSED TO BE CHANGED JUST A LITTLE BIT.

THERE'S THE FIRST ITEM IS THE ORIENTATION.

THE PARK AREA WAS IT'S HEAVILY IMPACTED BY THE WESTERN SUN.

IT WAS PROPOSED AS A CONCRETE PLAZA AREA, WHICH WOULD BE REALLY HOT IN, YOU KNOW, SEVERAL MONTHS OUT OF THE YEAR, AND WE'RE NOT CHANGING ANY OF THE DESIGN REGULATIONS IN THIS PARTICULAR ZONING AMENDMENT.

IT'S STRICTLY ADOPTING THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN, BUT I FELT LIKE IT WAS IMPORTANT TO POINT THAT OUT, THAT THE PROPOSED PLAZA IS MORE OF A GREEN SPACE, AND YOU WILL HAVE THE STRUCTURES ON THE NORTHWEST SIDE TO HELP SHADE THAT AREA SO THAT IT WOULD BE MORE INVITING.

THE DEVELOPER IS ALSO REQUESTED TO HAVE SOME CONDOMINIUM UNITS JUST SOUTHEAST OF THE PASSIVE OPEN SPACE AREA. THAT WOULD HAVE TO COME BACK TO YOU AS A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT TO ALLOW THAT USE. BLOCK P.

ONCE AGAIN ON THE WEST IS THE PROPOSED.

I MEAN, ON THE LEFT IS THE PROPOSED AND ON THE EAST IS THE EXISTING PLAN.

SO WE ARE WHAT WE'RE DOING IS TO REFLECT WHAT CITY, WHAT TOWN COUNCIL APPROVED A FEW MONTHS AGO REGARDING THE RETAINING TWO NONRESIDENTIAL LOTS AT THE NORTHEAST PORTION OF THE BLOCK IN THE SOUTHWEST PORTION, AND THEN IN THE INTERIOR TO HAVE THE ABILITY TO HAVE UP TO 32 RESIDENTIAL UNITS IN THAT AREA, AND ONCE AGAIN, THAT USE COULD ALSO INCLUDE CONDOMINIUMS AS A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT APPLICATION, AND THEN THE BLOCK Q FINALLY, THE AMENDMENT WOULD REFLECT THE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT BACK IN.

I THINK IT WAS LAST YEAR WITH ORDINANCE 959, AND IT DID HAVE RESIDENTIAL IN THIS AREA.

SO THAT WAS AMENDED TO REMOVE ALL OF THE RESIDENTIAL COMPONENT, AND BLOCK IS INTENDED TO INCLUDE ONLY TAX GENERATING, SALES TAX GENERATING USES.

SO THAT IS ALSO INCLUDED IN THIS UPDATE, AND THOSE EXHIBITS DIDN'T CARRY OVER.

LET ME SEE [INAUDIBLE]. THEN THE LAST BLOCK WOULD BE INCLUDED IS THE WESTLAKE SOUTH LAKE PARK ADDITION, AND UNFORTUNATELY I MISSED PUTTING THE PROPER LAYOUT FOR THAT, BUT IT IS THE SINGLE FAMILY DEVELOPMENT THAT WAS APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL.

SO WITH THIS AMENDMENT, WE'RE TAKING A LOT OF PIECES THAT HAVE BEEN APPROVED AND PUTTING THEM ONTO ONE EXHIBIT.

THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE OVERALL ENTRADA DEVELOPMENT AND MANY OF THESE USES, OR ALL OF THESE USES, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF SUPS, ARE ALREADY PERMITTED USES.

THE DEVELOPMENT HAS THE ABILITY TO MOVE THESE ITEMS AROUND.

THE RESIDENTIAL UNITS ARE CAPPED AT A MAXIMUM OF 322 FOR THE DEVELOPMENT.

THE DEVELOPER IS IS WELL WITHIN THAT RESTRICTION.

THIS IS THE EXHIBIT YOU SAW AT THE VERY BEGINNING THAT IDENTIFIES WHAT IS BEING REQUESTED IN EACH ONE OF THESE BLOCKS.

I MENTIONED THE PROPOSED REQUEST, YOUR PACKET AND THE CAPTION FOR THE MEETING INCLUDED BLOCK L LOTS 1R AND 2.

THE DEVELOPER HAS REQUESTED TO REMOVE THOSE AMENDMENTS FROM THIS APPLICATION.

SO THE EXHIBITS THAT YOU HAD IN FRONT OF YOU DID NOT INCLUDE ANY CHANGES TO BLOCK L AND AS I MENTIONED EARLIER, THE PURPOSE IS TO BE

[00:10:03]

ABLE TO MEET THE MARKET DEMANDS AND TRENDS FOR DEVELOPMENT IN THE OVERALL SUCCESS OF THE.

ENTRADA DEVELOPMENT PLAN.

THIS IS ALSO REQUIRED FOR THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT.

THE SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN THAT'S SCHEDULED TO GO BEFORE CITY COUNCIL NEXT OR LATER THIS MONTH, AND THE TWO NEED TO MATCH, AND IT'S TIME TO UPDATE THE BID.

SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN.

THE SUMMARY AND THE RECOMMENDATION IS TO APPROVE THE BLOCKS WITHIN THE APPLICATION REQUESTED AS AS PRESENTED THIS EVENING, AS WELL AS IN YOUR AGENDA PACKET.

THE REQUIRED NOTIFICATIONS TO THE PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 200FT HAVE BEEN DISTRIBUTED AND POSTED IN THE NEWSPAPER AS REQUIRED, AND WE HAVE NOT RECEIVED ANY WRITTEN RESPONSES IN FAVOR OR IN OPPOSITION TO THE APPLICATION REQUEST AND THE COMMISSION HAS FOUR DIFFERENT OPTIONS UP THERE.

YOU CAN APPROVE IT AS PRESENTED AND STAFF'S RECOMMENDING APPROVAL AS PRESENTED.

YOU HAVE THE ABILITY TO MAKE MODIFICATIONS OR ADD SOME CONDITIONS OR EVEN TABLE THE ITEM IF NEEDED, BUT AS I SAID, STAFF DOES RECOMMEND APPROVAL AND I'D BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU MIGHT HAVE AT THIS TIME, AND THE DEVELOPER IS HERE THIS AFTERNOON FOR ANY DEVELOPMENT QUESTIONS YOU WOULD HAVE FOR HIM.

IS THERE ANY ADDITIONAL PRESENTATION THAT'S GOING TO BE COMING FROM THE DEVELOPER? NO. OKAY. SO QUESTIONS.

FROM A TOTAL UNIT PERSPECTIVE.

SO WE'RE STILL WITHIN CALL IT OUR LIMIT, AND WE'RE ACTUALLY AGAIN REDUCING DENSITY AT THIS POINT, AND ESSENTIALLY WE'RE SHUFFLING THE COMMERCIAL UP TO THE 114 CORRIDOR, AND THEN WE'RE ALIGNING THE PIDS WITH THE SPECIFIC LOTS AND REBALANCING THAT APPROPRIATELY.

YES, SIR. THAT'S CORRECT.

SO THE MAJOR CHANGES THAT YOU SEE ARE THE ONES OUTLINED IN YOUR PRESENTATION.

ALSO HAVE A FOAM BOARD HERE IN FRONT.

THANK YOU.

SO ALL THAT ALONG THE CANAL IS COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT STILL THE REST OF IT, AS YOU CAN SEE IN THIS IS MOVING Q TO ALL SALES TAX DRIVEN COMMERCIAL PROPERTY, AND THEN WITH ORDINANCE 959, MOVING THE RESIDENTIAL FROM BLOCK Q DOWN HERE TO THE SOUTHERN PORTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT EVERYTHING THAT YOU SEE IN YOUR PACKET AND ON THIS FOAM BOARD THAT IS IN ORANGE IS SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED.

RIGHT. SO THAT COULD BE ROW TYPE HOUSING OR SOMETHING SIMILAR TO THE BROWNSTONES THAT ARE IN SOUTHLAKE OR IT COULD BE CONDOS WITH AN SUP.

SO ALL OF THAT IS CAPABLE WITHIN THOSE UNITS, AND THEN THE YELLOW THAT YOU SEE THERE IS ALL SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED, WHICH WOULD BE A NORMAL SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING BUT NOT BEING DEFINED. THIS EVENING.

THAT'S CORRECT. NONE OF THE LOT LINES ARE BEING DEFINED THIS EVENING.

THESE ARE ALL JUST USED AS EXAMPLES.

SO TWO THINGS. CAN WE A.) REMOVE THE BUILDING FOOTPRINTS ON THIS SINCE THEY'RE NOT BEEN DESIGNATED YET AS WELL AS IN BLOCK K, HOW IS THE ACCESS TO THE UNITS THAT ARE SHOWN THERE.

WHERE'S THE ROAD? ASSUMING THAT'S AN ALLEYWAY WITH GARAGES FACING.

YES, SIR, AND COMMISSIONER THAT WOULD BE A GOOD REASON TO NOT SHOW THE INDIVIDUAL LOTS, BECAUSE THERE WOULD BE SOME TYPE OF INGRESS EGRESS IN THIS AREA BECAUSE THESE UNITS WILL FACE ONTO THE GREEN SPACE AND THEN THE OTHER UNITS FACED TO THE WEST.

SO IF WE JUST DISREGARD ALL OF THAT, REMOVE ALL OF THAT AND JUST LOOK AT IT AS A REALLOCATION OF WHAT CAN GET BUILT WHERE, THEN THEY WILL HAVE TO COME BACK FOR SPECIFIC APPROVAL TO INCLUDE THE ROAD.

THE GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THIS IS REALLY A COLOR BLOCK STUDY AND YOU'RE RIGHT, IT'S BETTER TO HAVE THOSE FOOTPRINTS REMOVED BECAUSE WE'RE NOT APPROVING THAT AT THIS LEVEL, AND W

[00:15:08]

E ARE WITHIN THE DEVELOPMENT DENSITY.

ONE OTHER QUESTION ON I GUESS BLOCK K ON THAT BOARD, IT SHOWS COMMERCIAL ON THE ROAD AND ON THIS THAT WE HAVE SHOWS THAT IT'S SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED.

IT'S MY UNDERSTANDING THAT THIS IS WHAT THE APPLICANT REQUESTS, THAT THE SMALL COMMERCIAL COMPONENT AT THE END OF THE EASTERN PORTION OF THAT BLOCK.

NO, I UNDERSTAND THAT IF YOU LOOK AT THE BIG BOARD, THOUGH, I'M JUST MAKING SURE.

YES. OKAY.

SO TO THAT POINT, THEN THE GREEN SPACE, HOW IS THAT GOING TO BE.

WHAT IS THE PROPOSAL ON ACCESS TO THAT.

SO THAT IT IS I THINK IF I REMEMBER CORRECTLY, THAT WAS SUPPOSED TO ALWAYS BE DESIGNED AS A COMMUNITY SPACE AND THAT WOULD LOOK LIKE THAT IS MORE DESIGNED FOR THE PEOPLE THAT LIVE THERE IN THAT COMMERCIAL PROPERTY.

YOU'RE EXACTLY RIGHT, DAVID.

AGAIN, ANOTHER REASON TO REMOVE ALL THE FOOTPRINTS, BECAUSE THAT WOULD BE BROUGHT FORWARD WITH THAT SECTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT WHEN IT'S ACTUALLY BROUGHT FORWARD AS A PIECE FOR US TO APPROVE. SO WE WOULD BE ABLE TO LOOK AT THE SO THERE WOULD BE ACCESS, THERE WOULD HAVE TO BE ACCESS ADDED.

THAT'S CORRECT. BOTH FOR THE ALLEYWAY AND THEN ALSO FOR THE PUBLIC USE OF THE PARK.

YES, SIR. WE REALLY NEED TO SEE THIS WITHOUT THE BUILDING FOOTPRINTS ON THERE AND SEE IT MORE LIKE A ZONING MAP THAT SAYS THIS COLOR EQUALS THIS TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT AND NOTHING MORE REALLY AND I HAVE ONE OTHER QUESTION.

I'M SORRY. IN TOWN OF WESTLAKE SPEAK, WHAT CONSTITUTES A CONDOMINIUM? THAT'S A GOOD QUESTION, AND THE DEVELOPER DEVELOPER COULD PROBABLY ANSWER IT EVEN BETTER, BUT IN THE PLANNING CONCEPT OF THAT, IT'S A MULTI UNIT COMPLEX ON ONE LOT THAT SHARES COMMON SPACES AND HAVE A PROPERTY OWNER'S ASSOCIATION, THAT THOSE ARE SOLD IN FEE SIMPLE.

THAT'S WHAT WE THOUGHT. I JUST BECAUSE IN OTHER PARTS OF THE COUNTRY [INAUDIBLE] CAN BE COMPLETELY DIFFERENT.

SO JUST WANTED TO MAKE SURE.

THANK YOU. ONE LOT.

MULTIPLE UNITS.

OKAY. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FROM COMMISSIONERS? GENERALLY IN FAVOR OF.

THANK YOU. I'M GENERALLY IN FAVOR OF THE REVISED DEVELOPMENT PLAN.

HOWEVER, I'VE GOT TWO PRIMARY CONCERNS.

ONE IS WITH THE I THINK THERE NEEDS TO BE A MINIMUM FRONT YARD AND REAR YARD SETBACK.

I THINK WE NEED TO ESTABLISH SOME SORT OF VIEW CORRIDOR.

IF YOU DRIVE SOME OF THE PRODUCT THAT'S ON THE GROUND TODAY THE GARAGES ARE WITHIN AN INCH OR TWO, CERTAINLY WITHIN SIX INCHES OF THE ACTUAL ROADWAY, AND THOSE ROADWAYS ARE ONLY 24FT, WHICH IS THE MINIMUM FOR FIRE LANES, AND TO ME, IF YOU'RE BACKING OUT OF THAT, YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE TO BE 12FT, 10-12FT UNTIL YOU CAN ACTUALLY SEE WHAT'S IN THAT ROADWAY. TO ME, THAT'S A VERY DANGEROUS SITUATION AND EVERY CITY I'VE EVER WORKED IN, WE HAVE VIEW CORRIDORS THAT WE HAVE TO ADHERE TO.

I THINK THAT IT WOULD BE A MISTAKE TO ALLOW THAT SITUATION TO EXPAND BEYOND WHAT'S CONTAINED, WHERE IT'S ENTITLED TODAY, AT CERTAIN LOCATIONS.

IT'S NOT ENTITLED TODAY FOR NEW LOCATIONS.

WHAT WE'RE BEING ASKED TODAY TO APPROVE IS EXPANDING THAT, AND I HAVE A REAL PROBLEM WITH EXPANDING A KNOWN PROBLEM, OR WHAT I CONSIDER A KNOWN PROBLEM.

IT MAY NOT BE A KNOWN PROBLEM TO EVERYBODY ELSE, BUT I COULD CERTAINLY CONSIDER IT A KNOWN PROBLEM.

ADDITIONALLY, WE HAVE A SITUATION WHERE.

LET'S JUST SAY AN AMAZON.

I HAVE AN AMAZON DELIVERY TO MY HOUSE.

THERE'S NO PLACE FOR THAT AMAZON TRUCK TO PARK TO DELIVER TO MY HOUSE.

THAT'S CONVENIENT.

SO THEY'RE GOING TO PARK IN THAT 24 FOOT FIRE LANE, WHICH CREATES A DANGEROUS SITUATION, AND I THINK AS A CITY, WE NEED TO CORRECT THAT PROBLEM.

OR IN SOME PLACES WE MIGHT NOT BE ABLE TO CORRECT IT, BUT WE CERTAINLY HAVE, I THINK, AN OBLIGATION TO PREVENT IT FROM SPREADING, AND

[00:20:08]

THAT'S WHAT WE'RE BEING ASKED TO DO TONIGHT.

SO I WOULD MAKE A MOTION LATER ON TO APPROVE, SUBJECT TO TWO THINGS.

NUMBER ONE, WE CREATE A VIEW CORRIDOR OR A TRIANGLE WITH SOME FRONT AND REAR YARD SETBACKS SO THAT WE DON'T HAVE THE GARAGES RIGHT ON THE STREET, CREATING WHAT I CONSIDER A DANGEROUS CONDITION, AND WE PROVIDE SOME SORT OF OFF ROAD PARKING.

YOU KNOW, WE'VE GOT A SITUATION NOW WITH WITH TWO RESTAURANTS OPENING UP.

THEY'RE GOING TO GET DAILY DELIVERIES.

WHERE ARE THOSE TRUCKS GOING TO PARK? THEY'RE GOING TO PARK IN THAT 24 FOOT RIGHT OF WAY, AND THEY'RE GOING TO BLOCK A FIRE LANE.

HEAVEN FORBID SOMEBODY HAVE AN ACCIDENT DOWN AT THE EVENT CENTER AND NEED AN AMBULANCE OR NEED A FIRE TRUCK.

WE'RE GOING TO LOOK REALLY BAD.

I THINK THIS DEVELOPMENT I KNOW IN THE PAST THIS DEVELOPMENT HAS BEEN PUSHED TO HAVE STRUCTURED PARKING.

IF YOU GO TO SOUTHLAKE TOWN SQUARE, YOU'LL NOTICE ALL OF THE STREET PARKING IS OCCUPIED AND ONLY WHEN THAT'S OCCUPIED DO YOU SEE PEOPLE GO TO THE PARKING STRUCTURE.

BY NATURE, UNLESS YOU'RE GOING TO BE AT SOME PLACE FOR MULTIPLE HOURS, EVEN WHEN IT'S 100 PLUS DEGREES OUTSIDE, PEOPLE ARE GOING TO PARK WHERE IT'S CLOSEST TO THE DOOR, AND THAT'S GENERALLY NOT A STRUCTURED PARKING LOCATION.

SO IF WE WANT TO ATTRACT COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT, WE AS A CITY HAVE TO ALLOW MR. BEATY TO DO SOME ONSITE PARKING GARAGES OR PARKING SPACES AND MAYBE SOME ONSITE STREET PARKING, BUT I CANNOT SUPPORT THE EXPANSION.

THIS DEVELOPMENT PLAN MODIFICATION WITHOUT THOSE TWO ITEMS BEING ADDRESSED, AND I UNDERSTAND THAT NEEDS TO BE DONE THROUGH THE DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, WHATEVER THAT'S CALLED, BUT WITHOUT THAT, I CANNOT SUPPORT IT.

DO WE HAVE OTHER QUESTIONS? ANYONE? SO A COMMENT TO THAT.

IF WE REMOVE THE FOOTPRINTS OF ANY OF THE BUILDINGS AND ALL WE'RE LOOKING AT IS CHANGING THE COLORS, REALIGNING HOW THESE PARCELS ARE TO BE DEVELOPED AT SOME FUTURE STATE, THEY'RE GOING TO HAVE TO COME BACK WITH A PLOT PLAN, A PD SITE PLAN AND I THINK WE CAN TABLE YOUR OBJECTION.

YOU'VE NOTED IT, BUT I THINK WE CAN APPROVE A COLOR CHANGE.

HE WILL HAVE TO COME BACK.

SO I'D LOVE TO HEAR IF YOU'VE GOT ANY FEEDBACK FOR THIS, BECAUSE I DON'T DISCOUNT HIS RAISING OF THE ISSUE.

AMAZON TRUCK COMES IN.

WHERE DOES THE AMAZON TRUCK PARK? IT'S GOING TO PARK IN THE MIDDLE OF THE STREET.

SO WE ALSO HAD A CONVERSATION ABOUT MARKING THESE AS FIRE LANES SO THAT THERE IS NO PARKING ALLOWED IN THERE.

THIS IS A PROBLEM THAT WE AT SOME POINT SHOULD ADDRESS.

MICHAEL BEATY, 4110 RIVERWALK DRIVE.

THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME TONIGHT.

I APPRECIATE IT.

THANK YOU FOR THE AIR CONDITIONING.

I APPRECIATE THAT EVEN MORE.

I USED TO HAVE TO LAY BRICK FOR A LIVING, AND EVERY DAY IT'S LIKE THIS.

I WAS LIKE, OH, THANK GOD, IT'S JUST HOT.

I AGREE 100% WITH WHAT MR. WILKINSON IS SAYING.

WE'VE ACTUALLY PUT THAT INTO EFFECT ALREADY, THE PHASE 351 LOTS.

THOSE STREETS ARE 31FT WIDE BY DESIGN.

SO YOU'VE GOT YOU SOLVED YOUR FILING ISSUE, SIDE PARKING AND ALL THE INDIVIDUAL SPACES THAT WERE AVAILABLE FOR AN EXTRA GUEST PARKING OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT.

WE'RE ADDING IN THAT SITE PLAN AS WELL THOSE CONSTRUCTION PLANS.

HERE, I CAN'T GO TAKE UP THE ROADS THAT WE'VE ALREADY POURED.

THERE WAS SOME DISCUSSION INITIALLY ABOUT STRIPING THOSE AS FIRE LANES.

IT WAS ESTHETICALLY DECIDED AT THE TIME NOT TO STRIKE THEM AS FIRE LANES, PROBABLY BECAUSE THAT CONCRETE TODAY IS THE EXPOSED AGGREGATE.

IT'S NOT GOING TO TAKE PAINT VERY WELL.

BEST THING TO DO WOULD BE TO PUT LITTLE SIGNS UP SAYING NO PARKING FIRE LANE, AND THEN THAT GIVES THE POLICE DEPARTMENT THE RIGHT TO CALL A TOW TRUCK IF SOMETHING WAS TO HAPPEN OR WHAT WE'RE PROPOSING.

I KNOW THESE AREN'T THE SITE PLANS, BUT ALL OF OUR STREETS ARE MATCHING.

[00:25:02]

YOU KNOW, THAT'S BASICALLY AN H GRID.

TAKING AWAY THE LINE OF SIGHT ISSUES THAT WE HAVE IN PHASE ONE, DOING THE SAME THING HERE DOWN ON BLOCK K.

THAT'S THE ALLEY.

STRAIGHT SHOT, A LITTLE CURVE JUST TO BREAK IT UP SOMEWHAT, BUT THOSE THOSE ARE THINGS THAT WE'RE TAKING INTO ACCOUNT MOVING FORWARD.

THE PHASE TWO COMMERCIAL SITE PLAN STRAIGHT SHOTS 24 FOOT FIRE LANE SURFACE PARKING.

HOPEFULLY WE GET THAT BACK IN FRONT OF P&Z SOON.

THE OTHER CONCERN ABOUT SETBACKS, THE WAY THE ZONING WAS WRITTEN ON THE DRIVEWAYS THAT THE GARAGE DOOR HAS TO BE WITHIN THREE FEET OR MORE THAN 15FT, SO YOU DON'T HAVE PEOPLE BACKING OUT BLIND INTO THE ALLEYS.

SO ALL OF OUR SITE PLANS MATCH THAT EXISTING AND FUTURE PROPOSED THE FRONT YARDS.

THE WRITTEN ZONING HAS NO SETBACKS.

IT'S ACTUALLY IN THE DESIGN GUIDELINES, THIS SERIES OF FORM BASED ZONING CHARTS THAT ROBIN MCCAFFREY PUT TOGETHER, THAT TO CREATE A TRUE FRONT YARD SETBACK, WE WOULD HAVE TO GO THROUGH AND CHANGE ALL OF THAT.

I YOU KNOW, WHAT WE'VE BUILT INTENTIONALLY HAS A FRONT YARD SETBACK.

THERE'S VERY FEW INSTANCES WHERE I'M ACTUALLY ON THE PROPERTY LINE.

EVERY RESIDENTIAL LOT EITHER HAS A THREE FOOT OR A 6.5FT, OR SOMETIMES SEVEN FOOT.

IT VARIES FOR THE DUCT BANK, WATER LINE AND TELECOM LIKE ELECTRIC AND GAS ON THE SAME SIDES OF THE STREETS.

SO UNDERSTANDING THE MISTAKES OF PHASE ONE, UNDERSTANDING THE LINE OF SIGHT ISSUES, ESPECIALLY ON CORNELIUS AND KENT, YOU KNOW, CATALONIA, BUT DON'T SHOOT ME TODAY FOR WHAT I WAS TOLD TO DO TEN YEARS AGO.

I DIDN'T LIKE IT THEN; DON'T LIKE IT TODAY.

I REMEMBER WHEN WE FIRST DID THE LAYOUT.

I WAS SPECIFICALLY TOLD TO GO BACK AND CURVE THEM UP.

SO MOVING FORWARD, EVERYTHING THAT WE'RE BRINGING TO THE TABLE HAS THOSE ISSUES IN MIND, AND WE'RE DOING THE BEST WE CAN TO ADDRESS THEM.

FOR THE RESTAURANTS, WE FINISHED THE 114 CONNECTION.

THEN YOU HAVE THE TWO POINTS OF ACCESS AWAY FROM THE PARKING GARAGE, SO THAT GETS A WHOLE LOT SAFER.

IT'S NO LONGER THE DEAD END CUL DE SAC.

ARE YOU GOING TO BE ABLE TO ESTABLISH A PLACE FOR THEM TO BE ABLE TO LOAD AND OFFLOAD? WE [INAUDIBLE] RESTAURANTS OVER IN FLOWER MOUND.

SO I'VE KIND OF LEARNED THIS THE HARD WAY, AND I HAVE A 24 FOOT FIRE LANE TO GET DOWN TO THEM.

THEY'RE DOWN ON THE WATERFRONT NEXT TO A PARKING GARAGE.

WE HAVE TO SCHEDULE DELIVERIES OUTSIDE OF SERVICE HOURS.

IT'S THE ONLY WAY TO DO IT.

THEY HAVE TO BE THERE BEFORE 2:00, OR THEY DON'T SHOW UP TILL THE NEXT MORNING.

SO WE CAN'T HAVE WE CAN'T BE OPEN FOR SERVICE AND RECEIVING 18 WHEELERS AT THE SAME TIME.

I DON'T KNOW HOW WE CODIFY THAT.

IT'S MORE OF A RESTAURANT OPERATOR CONVERSATION, BUT IT'S NOT HARD TO SET UP WITH THE VENDORS THEY UNDERSTAND.

I CAN'T SUPPORT EXPANDING.

THE ENTITLEMENTS PROPOSED UNLESS WE HAVE THOSE NAILED DOWN AND IF YOU POSSIBLY YOU WOULD COMMIT TO CREATING VIEW CORRIDORS ON MINIMUM VIEW ANGLE SIGHTLINE FOR THE GARAGES, AND WE HAVE COMMIT TO OFFSITE PARKING TO ACCOMMODATE FOR DELIVERIES.

YOU KNOW, THESE VEHICLES, THESE RESIDENCES ARE GOING TO NEED SERVICE WORK.

THEY'RE GOING TO HAVE CLEANING PEOPLE.

THEY NEED A PLACE TO PARK.

IT'S NOT PROVIDED CURRENTLY KEPT IN A PARKING GARAGE, AND THEY'RE NOT GOING TO WALK FROM THE PARKING GARAGE TO THAT HOUSE.

SO I CANNOT IN GOOD CONSCIENCE EMBRACE A EXPANSION OF OF THAT.

OKAY, BUT WE'RE NOT ASKING FOR AN EXPANSION TONIGHT.

THIS IS JUST IDENTIFYING THE FUTURE PROPOSED USES TO GET IN ALIGNMENT WITH THE SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN.

WHEN I COME BEFORE YOU AGAIN WITH A PD SITE PLAN FOR EACH ONE OF THESE BLOCKS, THAT'S WHEN I HAVE TO ADDRESS LINE OF SITES COMING OUT OF THE GARAGE, ADDITIONAL GUEST PARKING, AND MAKING SURE THAT YOU KNOW WHAT WE'RE BUILDING MAKES SENSE MOVING FORWARD.

I CAN'T UNDO THE BLOCK.

WE PUT UP MIRRORS, AND I TORE DOWN HALF OF A RETAINING WALL UP AT STARBUCKS TO TRY TO FIX THAT BLIND CORNER WHEN I FIRST PURCHASED THE PROJECT, SO I CAN'T UNDO PHASE ONE.

I CAN SAY THAT THE PHASE TWO COMMERCIAL WILL BE SURFACE PARKED, AND LOOKED A WHOLE LOT MORE LIKE SOUTHLAKE TOWN SQUARE THAN PHASE ONE DOES NOW.

HOPEFULLY, AND THEN PHASE THREE RESIDENTIAL.

WE'VE ADDRESSED EVERYTHING THAT YOU'RE MENTIONING 31FT WIDE STREETS, NORMAL CURB TO CURB DISTANCES.

ADDITIONAL GUEST PARKING WHERE AVAILABLE THROUGHOUT THE DEVELOPMENT.

[00:30:02]

HERE, THE BEST I HAVE BEEN ABLE TO DO WAS WE GAVE UP TWO RESIDENTIAL LOTS DOWN ON THE WATER, PUT IN 9 OR 12 GUEST PARKING SPACES IN THAT LITTLE BLOCK OFF AREA OFF OF CORNELIUS.

WE'VE TRIED TO IDENTIFY OTHER SITES LIKE THAT ON THE OTHER BLOCKS; IT HASN'T REALLY FIT IN VERY WELL, BUT THOSE HOUSES ARE ALSO BIGGER WITH LARGER DRIVEWAYS.

MICHAEL, ARE YOU WILLING TO COMMIT TONIGHT THAT THE FUTURE.

WHAT'S THE NEXT STEP? SITE PLAN? PD SITE PLAN.

YES, SIR. THE PD SITE PLAN WILL ADHERE TO A MINIMUM VIEW CORRIDOR FOR THE GARAGES AND FOR ADDITIONAL PARKING FOR DELIVERIES AND SERVICE AND THINGS OF THAT, BOTH RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL? YES, SIR.

YES, SIR. THANK YOU. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? SO WE HAVE FOUR OPTIONS BEFORE US, BUT I THINK WE ALL AGREE THAT WE HAVE TO ELIMINATE THE FOOTPRINTS THAT ARE HERE.

WE'RE NOT APPROVING FOOTPRINTS.

WE'RE SIMPLY APPROVING THE USE CHANGES FOR THESE SECTIONS, AND SO, YOU KNOW, EVERYONE'S GOT THE FOUR OPTIONS IN FRONT OF THEM.

I WOULD RECOMMEND THAT WE APPROVE, PER THE STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION.

CHAIRMAN, BEFORE YOU HAVE A MOTION, WE NEED TO OPEN AND CLOSE THAT PUBLIC HEARING.

OKAY. YEAH. THANK YOU.

DO WE HAVE ANY? I'LL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING.

IS THERE ANYBODY HERE WHO WOULD LIKE TO COMMENT ON THESE CHANGES? NONE HEARD. I'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.

NOW, I'LL ASK MY FELLOW COMMISSIONERS FOR A MOTION.

I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE WITH THE NOTE OF STAFF'S COMMENTS AND WITH THE ASSURANCE THAT MICHAEL BEATY GAVE US THAT THE FUTURE SITE PLANS WILL ADDRESS BOTH ONSITE STREET PARKING AND VIEW CORRIDORS OR GARAGES.

YEAH. CAN I HAVE A SECOND? I'LL SECOND. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. ALL OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES UNANIMOUS.

OKAY. AGENDA ITEM D2.

[D.2. Hold public hearing, discuss, consider and act to make a recommendation to Town Council regarding a Replat for Lots 13R-1A and 13R-1B, Block I of the Vaquero Phase 1 Residential Addition, Town of Westlake, Tarrant County, Texas. The property is generally located west of Post Oak Place, east of Hawthorn Way and south of Vaquero Club Lane.]

HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING.

DISCUSS, CONSIDER AN ACT TO MAKE A RECOMMENDATION TO TOWN COUNCIL REGARDING A REPLAT FOR LOTS 13R1A AND 13R1B BLOCK ONE OF THE VAQUERO PHASE ONE RESIDENTIAL ADDITION, TOWN OF WESTLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS.

THE PROPERTY IS GENERALLY LOCATED WEST OF POST OAK PLACE, EAST OF HAWTHORNE WAY, AND SOUTH OF VAQUERO CLUB LANE.

STAFF, DO WE HAVE A PRESENTATION? YES, SIR. THANK YOU.

TO FAMILIARIZE YOURSELF WITH THE PROPERTY LOCATION.

THE PROPERTY IS ADDRESSED OFF OF HAWTHORNE WAY, AND IT ALSO HAS FRONTAGE ALONG POST OAK PLACE AND SOUTH OF VAQUERO CLUB DRIVE.

THIS IS THE REPLAT EXHIBIT BEFORE YOU, AND THE WHOLE PARCEL.

THE ORIGINAL LOT...

GIVING ME A HARD TIME.

HERE WE GO, AND THIS IS THE OVERALL LOT AND WHAT THEY ARE DOING WITH THIS REPLAT IS ADDING A NEW LOT LINE TO DIVIDE THESE INTO TWO SEPARATE LOTS, AND THE PROPERTY WAS ORIGINALLY TWO SEPARATE LOTS, AND THIS NEW LOT CONFIGURATION IS VERY SIMILAR.

THIS IS A REPRESENTATION OF WHAT IT IS, AN OUTLINE OF WHAT IT IS THEY ARE WANTING TO DO WITH THE REPLAT.

AS I MENTIONED EARLIER, IT WAS ORIGINALLY TWO LOTS YEARS AGO AND IT WAS RE-PLATTED INTO ONE LOT.

IT'S PART OF A PD3-1 AND 1-3 OF THE OVERALL DEVELOPMENT.

THE SETBACKS FOR THE PROPERTY.

BOTH PROPERTIES ARE BASED ON LOT SIZES, AND THE PROPOSED REPLAT MEETS THE ZONING DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS AND THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, AS WELL AS IN THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE, AND STAFF DID DISTRIBUTE THE REQUIRED PUBLIC HEARING NOTICES BECAUSE IT IS A RESIDENTIAL REPLAT.

THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS ALSO PUBLISHED IN THE FORT WORTH STAR TELEGRAM, AND STAFF RECOMMENDS

[00:35:06]

APPROVAL OF THE REPLAT APPLICATION WITH ONE CONDITION THAT ALL EXISTING AND REQUIRED EASEMENTS FOR THE LOTS BE ILLUSTRATED.

THERE SHOULD BE A TEN FOOT ELECTRIC AND UTILITY EASEMENT ALONG THE NEW LOT LINE THAT'S BEING CREATED AND SHARED BETWEEN THE TWO PROPERTIES, AND THERE'S ALSO ANOTHER UTILITY EASEMENT ON THE NEW THE SECOND LOT THAT'S BEING CREATED AND THIS EVENING YOU HAVE THE ABILITY.

THERE ARE SIX DIFFERENT OPTIONS, AND THOSE ARE OPTIONS THAT I'VE SEEN STAFF USE IN THE PAST, AND AS YOUR INTERIM TOWN PLANNER, I FELT LIKE THOSE SHOULD STAY ON THERE AND BE CONSISTENT.

THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING AND THE APPLICANT MAY OR MAY NOT BE HERE.

SO THERE ARE NO OTHER PRESENTATIONS.

OKAY. THANK YOU FOR THAT.

ANYBODY HAVE ANY QUESTIONS.

SO WE GOT TWO LOTS IN VAQUERO THAT WERE REZONED TO ONE OR I'M SORRY RE-PLATTED TO ONE.

NOW WE'RE SPLITTING THEM BACK APART BACK TO TWO.

EVERYBODY GOOD ON THAT? SO I'M LOOKING FOR A MOTION TO ACTUALLY LET'S FIRST OPEN UP OUR PUBLIC HEARING.

I'M SORRY. DO WE HAVE ANYBODY HERE WHO'D LIKE TO COMMENT? MY DAUGHTER SITTING OVER THERE, WOULD YOU LIKE TO COMMENT? NO. OKAY, I'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING, AND I'M LOOKING FOR A MOTION TO APPROVE WITH THE RECOMMENDED CHANGES, WITH STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS.

I MOTION TO RECOMMEND FOR APPROVAL WITH STAFF.

STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS.

CAN I HAVE A SECOND? ALL IN FAVOR? AYE.

ALL OPPOSED? NONE OPPOSED. MOTION CARRIES WITH UNANIMOUS CONSENT.

OKAY. ITEM D3.

[D.3. Hold public hearing, discuss, consider and act to make a recommendation to Town Council regarding proposed amendments to Ordinances 928 and 939, as amended, regulating PD7 Zoning District, known as “Westlake Ranch”, for an approximate three-acre portion of land platted as Aspen Estates, Tarrant County, Texas. The property is generally located east of Pearson Lane and South of Aspen Lane.]

HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING.

DISCUSS, CONSIDER, AND ACT TO MAKE A RECOMMENDATION TO TOWN COUNCIL REGARDING PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO ORDINANCES 928 AND 939, AS AMENDED.

REGULATING PD SEVEN ZONING DISTRICT, KNOWN AS WESTLAKE RANCH FOR AN APPROXIMATE THREE ACRE PORTION OF LAND PLATTED AS ASPEN ESTATES, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS.

THE PROPERTY IS GENERALLY LOCATED EAST OF PEARSON LANE AND SOUTH OF ASPEN LANE.

DO WE HAVE A PRESENTATION? YES, SIR. THANK YOU.

HERE'S A LOCATION MAP TO FAMILIARIZE YOURSELF WITH WHERE THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED.

IT'S ALONG ASPEN LANE AND JUST EAST OF NORTH PEARSON LANE.

THE DEVELOPMENT IS ALREADY DEVELOPED AND AS YOU CAN SEE, IT'S IDENTIFIED UP THERE AS THE SUBJECT PROPERTY.

THERE'S AN EXISTING CONCRETE CUL DE SAC, AND THERE ARE THREE LOTS PLATTED ON ON THIS PROPERTY.

THEY HAVE ENTRYWAY GATING, AS WELL AS DECORATIVE METAL FENCING AND COLUMNS ALONG ASPEN LANE, AND THE APPLICANT, THIS IS THE EXISTING CONFIGURATION, AND THE APPLICANT WOULD LIKE TO REVISE THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND THE DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS TO PROVIDE FOR TWO LOTS, AND THIS IS THE UPDATED DEVELOPMENT PLAN.

IT'S KIND OF A ZOOM IN ON THE OVERALL EXHIBIT THAT'S INCLUDED IN YOUR PACKET, AND THE PROPERTY WILL NOW BE SERVED WITH THE PRIVATE STREET RIGHT OF WAY.

COMING OFF OF ASPEN LANE, AND THERE WILL BE PAVING WITH CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER UP UNTIL THE SOUTHERN BOUNDARY OF LOT ONE AT THAT POINT.