[00:00:03]
OKAY, LET'S GO AHEAD AND GET THIS MEETING STARTED.
[A. CALL TO ORDER AND ANNOUNCE QUORUM PRESENT]
WE'LL START WITH THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.WE HAD AN ISSUE LAST MEETING WITH UP AND DOWN WITH THE MICROPHONE.
[C.1. Introduction of Jason Alexander, AICP, CeCD, Deputy Town Manager (Wade Carroll, Town Manager)]
AND THANK YOU FOR HAVING SOME PATIENCE WITH US, AS WE'RE WAITING ON A FEW MORE MEMBERS TO GET HERE FOR OUR QUORUM.THIS IS HIS ENDING OF HIS FIRST WEEK, FIRST FULL WEEK WITH US ANYWAYS.
AS LONG AS WELL AS BEING THE DIRECTOR OVER THERE, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION.
SO HE HAS A GREAT WEALTH OF KNOWLEDGE IN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND IN A GREAT DEAL OF EXPERIENCE IN TOWN URBAN PLANNING SOLUTIONS, DESIGN AND LAND USE AND ADAPTED ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT.
SO WE'RE SUPER EXCITED TO HAVE HIM ON HERE.
HE HAS HIS UNDERGRAD FROM THE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA.
HE'S GOT A MASTER'S DEGREE IN REGIONAL PLANNING FROM GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, AND HE'S CURRENTLY ENROLLED AT MIT FOR AN EXECUTIVE MASTER'S OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION PROGRAM.
SO I HIRED SOMEBODY A WHOLE LOT SMARTER THAN ME, AND I'M PROUD OF THAT FACT.
SO. BUT ANYWAYS, JASON IS HERE WITH US NOW, TODAY.
AND JASON, DO YOU WANT TO COME UP AND JUST SAY A FEW WORDS AND THEN WE'LL GET STARTED WITH THE REST OF THE MEETING? THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
THANK YOU FOR THE WARM INTRODUCTION.
MR. CARROLL MR., VICE CHAIR, PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSIONERS I'M GOING TO BE A MAN OF FEW WORDS THIS EVENING AND JUST SAY, I'M HAPPY TO BE HERE AND SO LOOKING FORWARD TO WORKING WITH YOU ALL ON GROWING THE CITY ECONOMICALLY, PHYSICALLY AND CULTURALLY.
LOOKING FORWARD TO DOING SOME REALLY GREAT THINGS.
[D.1. Consider and act to approve the Planning and Zoning Commission August 13, 2024 Regular Meeting Minutes]
NEXT ON THE AGENDA IS APPROVE THE MINUTES.I ASSUME EVERYBODY'S HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO REVIEW THOSE.
ANY COMMENTS? I HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE.
DO WE HAVE ANY CITIZENS THAT WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS THE P&Z? SEEING NONE, WE'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC OR THE HEARING OR COMMENT SECTION.
NEXT, WE GO TO THE PUBLIC HEARING AND ACTION.
[F.1. Hold public hearing, discuss, consider and act to make a recommendation to the Town Council regarding a Resolution to approve the Final Plat of the Villaggio Addition (Helen-Eve Beadle, AICP, Interim Town Planning Consultant)]
ITEM F1, AGE 24-300.DISCUSS AND CONSIDER AN ACT TO MAKE A RECOMMENDATION TO THE TOWN COUNCIL REGARDING A RESOLUTION TO APPROVE THE FINAL PLAT OF THE VILLAGGIO ADDITION.
OKAY, DO WE HAVE A PRESENTATION? THANK YOU, VICE CHAIRMAN AND COMMISSIONERS.
SO THIS EVENING, THE FIRST ITEM OF BUSINESS IS THE FINAL PLAT FOR VELLAGIO.
THE PROJECT IS NEARING COMPLETION, AND VERY SOON WE'LL RECEIVE THEIR FINAL INSPECTIONS AND ACCEPTANCE FOR THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS.
THIS IS A VIEW OF THE PROJECT DEVELOPMENT WHERE THE ENTRANCEWAY IS PROPOSED, AND THE APPLICANTS REQUESTING APPROVAL OF THEIR FINAL PLAT ON A LITTLE OVER 37 ACRES AND 17 RESIDENTIAL LOTS.
[00:05:01]
IT'S A GATED COMMUNITY WITH PRIVATE STREETS, AND THE FINAL PLAT CONFORMS WITH THE ZONING, THE ADOPTED ZONING ORDINANCE, AS WELL AS THE PRELIMINARY SITE EVALUATION AND THE CIVIL CONSTRUCTION PLANS FOR THE PROJECT.THE STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION IS PRIOR TO FILING THE PLAT.
THE APPLICANT AND DEVELOPER IS HERE.
IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR THEM.
SO. DO YOU CARE TO MAKE A PRESENTATION I DON'T KNOW THAT ONE'S NECESSARY TONIGHT, BUT ANY COMMISSIONER HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OF THE APPLICANT? SEEING NONE.
CAN WE HAVE A MOTION? OH, SORRY. YES, I MOTION TO APPROVE.
THANK YOU. I SAID IT'S GOING TO BE UGLY.
OKAY. NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA IS F-2, CASE 24-301.
[F.2. Hold public hearing, discuss, consider and act to make a recommendation to Town Council regarding proposed amendments to Ordinances 928 and 939, as amended, regulating PD7 Zoning District, known as “Westlake Ranch”, for an approximate three-acre portion of land platted as Aspen Estates, Tarrant County, Texas. The property is generally located east of Pearson Lane and South of Aspen Lane. (Helen-Eve Beadle, AICP, Interim Town Planning Consultant)]
HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING.DISCUSS. CONSIDER AN ACT TO MAKE A RECOMMENDATION TO TOWN COUNCIL REGARDING PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO ORDINANCE 928 AND 939 AND AMENDED, AS AMENDED, REGULATED SEVEN ZONING DISTRICT KNOWN AS WESTLAKE RANCH, OR APPROXIMATELY THREE ACRE PORTION OF LAND PLATTED AS ASPEN ESTATES, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS.
THE PROPERTY IS GENERALLY LOCATED EAST OF PIERSON LANE AND SOUTH OF ASPEN.
SO THE ASPEN ESTATES MIGHT LOOK FAMILIAR TO YOU AT YOUR LAST PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING.
WHEN WE TOOK IT TO CITY COUNCIL THAT DAY, THE APPLICANT CONTACTED THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT AND WANTED TO AMEND THEIR ZONING APPLICATION, SO CITY COUNCIL CONSIDERED TABLING THE ITEM.
WE HAVE NOTICED THE PUBLIC HEARING AND WANTED TO BRING THIS BACK TO YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION TO ACTUALLY PROVIDE FOR A RECOMMENDATION FOR CITY COUNCIL FOR THEIR REVIEW.
AND THIS IS A VIEW FROM THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES.
THE APPLICATION INCLUDES A ONE LOT NOW, SO THE EXISTING ZONING IS FOR THREE LOTS.
THERE IS AN EXISTING TURNAROUND.
IT COULD HAVE THE NEXT SLIDE PLEASE.
THIS IS THE EXISTING PLAT FOR THE PROPERTY AS WELL AS THE EXISTING ZONING.
AND AS YOU CAN SEE THERE'S A PRIVATE STREET WITH A CUL DE SAC TURNAROUND FOR THE PROPERTY.
THE PLANS GOING FORWARD MAY HAVE THE NEXT SLIDE PLEASE.
AND THEY PLAN TO REMOVE A PORTION OR ALL OF THE CUL DE SAC AND A LOT OF THE DRIVEWAY TO PROVIDE FOR A LARGER BUILDING AREA FOR, FOR THE HOME, SO THE MAIN ENTRY WITH THE GATE WILL BECOME MORE OF A DRIVEWAY INSTEAD OF A FULL PRIVATE STREET.
THIS IS A PORTION OF THE CONCEPT PLAN THAT'S IN YOUR AGENDA PACKET.
THE STANDARDS FOR THE PROPERTY.
IT WILL BE A IT IS THE THREE ACRES AND THEY WILL HAVE ONE LOT.
[00:10:05]
AND DEDICATED TO THAT WILL BE PRIVATE OPEN SPACE ALL ALONG THE PERIMETER.THE NORTH SOUTH EAST WEST THE PERIMETER BOUNDARIES.
THERE'S A 40 FOOT BUFFER AREA.
SO THAT'S BEING CALCULATED AS OPEN SPACE.
IT'S A LITTLE OVER ONE ACRE OF OPEN SPACE.
THEY HAVE A MINIMUM LOT AREA OF 40,000.
THE REMAINDER OF THE BUILDING SETBACKS HEIGHT AREA REGULATIONS ARE ALSO INCLUDED ON THE SLIDE.
I HAVE THE NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE.
SHOULD YOU CHOOSE TO MAKE A RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL, THAT ALL OF THE CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS IN ORDINANCE 939 SHALL BE APPLICABLE. THE PRELIMINARY SITE EVALUATION WOULD NOT BE NECESSARY.
MOST OF THE INFRASTRUCTURE IS ALREADY IN.
THEY WILL HAVE CIVIL PLANS TO RESUBMIT, TO BE ABLE TO RELOCATE ANY UTILITY CONNECTIONS AND MOST OF THE DRIVEWAY FOR THAT AREA. THE CUL DE SAC.
THEY DO NEED TO SATISFY THE LANDSCAPING AND TREE SURVEY REQUIREMENTS.
AND ORDINANCE 928 AND A REPLAT WILL BE REQUIRED.
TAKING IT FROM THREE LOTS TO ONE LOT WILL ALSO BE REQUIRED BEFORE A BUILDING PERMIT IS ISSUED.
THE PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDS THIS ITEM TO BE APPROVED.
YOU HAVE A NUMBER OF OPTIONS TO BE ABLE TO APPROVE SOMETHING? I'D BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU MIGHT HAVE REGARDING THE DEVELOPMENT.
AND THE APP REPRESENTATIVE IS HERE THIS EVENING, SHOULD YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR THEM? I DO HAVE ONE QUESTION.
ON THE REPLAT OF THREE LOTS INTO TWO.
DOES THE TOWN OF WESTLAKE REQUIRE THAT THAT COME BACK BEFORE P AND Z AND COUNCIL, OR IS THAT CAN THAT BE DONE ADMINISTRATIVELY? GOOD QUESTION. BECAUSE OKAY, PLANS ARE CHANGING RIGHT NOW.
I'M NOT SURE WHEN THEY'RE GOING TO BE READY TO SUBMIT, BUT I BELIEVE STAFF IS LOOKING AT CHANGING THE PLANNING REQUIREMENTS TO MAKE THINGS A LITTLE BIT EASIER AND NOT SO TIME CONSUMING.
BUT CURRENTLY, IF THEY TURNED IN A REPLAT APPLICATION RIGHT AFTER COUNCIL APPROVED IT WOULD NEED TO GO THROUGH THE REVIEW PROCESS FROM THREE LOTS TO ONE LOT. MY ONLY COMMENT IS, YOU KNOW, I CERTAINLY HAVE NO OBJECTION TO THIS.
THIS REQUEST, I WOULD ALSO LIKE TO PUT IN THERE THAT THEY THAT DRIVE THAT EXISTS TODAY, THAT THAT NEEDS TO BE IT PROBABLY DESIGNATED AS A PUBLIC ACCESS.
YOU KNOW, EVEN THOUGH IT'S A PRIVATE DRIVE, IT'S PUBLIC ACCESS THAT NEEDS TO BE ELIMINATED.
SO THAT THAT'S A STANDALONE LOT.
AND SO I THINK AT THE PROPERTY LINE ALONG ASPEN, I WOULD SAY ANYTHING INTERIOR OF THE LOT BE FREE OF ANY EASEMENTS OR ACCESS AGREEMENTS OR ANYTHING OF THAT NATURE.
COULD YOU GO TO THE NEXT SLIDE? OKAY. I GUESS ON THE DETAILS IN THERE LET'S SEE, IS THE SECONDARY STRUCTURE UNINHABITABLE? ACCESSORY SPORT COURT AND ATHLETIC TRAINING FIELDS SHOULD ALSO BE ALLOWED ON SITE.
I MEAN, ARE THERE? I GUESS I DIDN'T MAYBE LOOK FAR ENOUGH IF YOU HAD ALL THE DETAILS CONCERNING LIMITATIONS ON THAT, BECAUSE I'M THINKING THAT COULD BE A VERY I DON'T WANT TO SAY GAUDY, BUT, YOU KNOW, PRETTY EXTENSIVE, MAKING IT LOOK LIKE A SMALL PARK WHERE YOU'VE GOT A HUGE SMALL SCHOOL KIND OF ATHLETIC FIELD LIGHTS, YOU KNOW, OUTDOOR LIGHTS AND STUFF THAT COULD BE VERY ATTRACTIVE TO NEIGHBORS IF YOU'VE GOT SOMETHING MAJOR LOOKING LIKE A SMALL SCHOOL GYM, OUTDOOR TRAINING.
WHAT KIND OF LIMITATIONS ARE WE LOOKING AT ON THERE? UNDERSTOOD. SO THE TOWN'S REGULATIONS ARE NOT SPECIFIC TO THE NUMBER OF ACCESSORY STRUCTURES OR ACCESSORY TYPE USES. THEY WOULD HAVE TO COMPLY WITH THE NOISE ORDINANCE AS WELL AS LIGHTING, IN CASE THEY WANTED TO ADD LIGHTING TO ANY OF THOSE FACILITIES.
IT'S FOR THE RESIDENTIAL LIGHTING STANDARDS.
NOT SUPPOSED TO BE COMMERCIAL.
AND THE LIGHT TRESPASS WOULD NEED TO BE PROVIDED THROUGH A PHOTOMETRIC PLAN IN A STUDY.
[00:15:05]
AND MEET THE FOOT CANDLE ALLOWANCES AT THE PROPERTY LINE.SO THERE'S NO SPILLAGE TO THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES LIKE THROUGH LIKE A CERTAIN TIME PERIOD AT NIGHT.
SO YOU DON'T HAVE LIKE BIG LIGHTS.
IT WOULD NEED TO WHEN THE LIGHTS ARE ON IT WOULD HAVE TO MEET PHOTOMETRIC REQUIREMENTS FOR THE TOWN.
I DON'T EVEN KNOW WHAT THAT IS FOR A RESIDENTIAL IN THERE.
I JUST KIND OF THOUGHT ABOUT THAT BECAUSE WE TALKED ABOUT IT IN OUR COMMERCIAL.
BUT FOR RESIDENTIAL, WHAT IS WHAT DOES THAT LOOK LIKE? I'M NOT FAMILIAR WITH THE TOWN'S LIGHTING CODE.
HOWEVER. MOST MUNICIPALITIES YOU HAVE TO READ EITHER AT A POINT ZERO, WHICH IS 0 OR 0.2 FOOT CANDLE RIGHT AT THE PROPERTY LINE. SO THERE WOULDN'T, THEY WOULDN'T BE ABLE TO HAVE LIGHT TRESPASS ON THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES.
AND I KNOW YOU MENTIONED COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES.
THEY OBVIOUSLY HAVE THE ABILITY TO USE SHIELDING AND OTHER MECHANISMS, BUT I DON'T EVEN KNOW THAT THAT'S THEIR INTENTION TO HAVE LIGHTED COURTS OR THIS IS ALL THEY'VE PROVIDED US WITH.
ACCOMMODATIONS. IT'S A SECONDARY RESIDENTIAL AND TWO NON INHABITABLE ACCESSORY STRUCTURES.
SO WHAT ARE THE LIMITS FOR THOSE.
THEY DO NOT HAVE DETAILS FOR THOSE HOWEVER THE MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE IS 35%.
SO THAT WOULD INCLUDE THE STRUCTURE COVERAGE.
ON THAT COMMENT OR ON THAT IF, IF THIS WERE LEFT AS THREE LOTS.
EACH OF THESE LOTS HAVE THE SAME ABILITY.
SO INSTEAD OF HAVING THREE AND THREE ATHLETIC FIELDS ONE AND ONE.
SO THIS IS A FROM MY PERSPECTIVE.
SO YEAH I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE IT BLENDS.
IT'S NOT GOING TO BE VERY OUT OF, YOU KNOW INAPPROPRIATE COMPARED TO THE REST OF THE I MEAN, IT COULD BE VERY, YOU KNOW, OBVIOUSLY VERY BEAUTIFUL. WE JUST DON'T WE JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT WE KIND OF UNDERSTAND WHAT.
GOOD EVENING. MY NAME IS CURTIS SHANNON WITH THE SAGE GROUP.
AND HOPEFULLY I CAN ADDRESS SOME OF THESE.
THE FIRST OF ALL, I AGREE WITH WHAT VICE CHAIRMAN WILKINSON SAID ABOUT IT'S OKAY TO CALL ME TERRY. THE ACCIDENT.
AND, YOU KNOW, WHEN WE WERE DOING TWO LOTS, THEY WERE GOING TO TAKE THE FRONT LOT AND TEMPORARILY PUT UP PLAY FIELDS THERE FOR THEIR YOUNG CHILDREN TO USE UNTIL THEY GREW UP.
AND THEN THEY WOULD REMOVE IT.
AND, YOU KNOW, THE ORIGINAL IDEA WAS TO SELL THE LOT.
AND, YOU KNOW, THE SECONDARY RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE ON A LOT THIS LARGE IS PROBABLY NOT THAT UNUSUAL TO HAVE. AND I'M NOT SURE WHAT THE OTHER ACCESSORY BUILDINGS MIGHT BE USED FOR, MAYBE JUST STORAGE OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT OF RECREATIONAL EQUIPMENT OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT.
BUT CLEARLY IT WOULD HAVE TO MEET ALL THE TOWN'S BUILDING STANDARDS AND THOSE KINDS OF THINGS.
REGARDING LIGHTING, I DON'T KNOW THAT THERE'S ANY PLANS TO LIGHT THOSE FIELDS AT NIGHT, BUT IF THERE WERE AS HELEN SAID, THEY WOULD HAVE TO MEET ALL THE TOWN'S LIGHTING STANDARDS.
I BELIEVE THIS IS A DARK SKY ORDINANCE TOWN.
RIGHT. SO THOSE STANDARDS ARE PRETTY STRICT.
AS THEY BEGIN TO PROGRESS ON THE LAYOUT OF THEIR HOME, EVERYTHING ON HERE WITH THE SLOPE, IT KIND OF GOES UP TO THE EAST A LITTLE BIT AND WORKING AROUND THE TREES OR WHATEVER, THEY WERE HAVING A HARD, HARDER AND HARDER TIME FITTING IT WITHIN THAT FIRST.
YOU KNOW THE SECOND LOT, WHAT WE CALL LOT TWO BEFORE AND THE SETBACKS AND EVERYTHING ELSE.
[00:20:06]
LOT AND GO THAT DIRECTION.I THINK THE, THE WORDING OF, FOR ME, THAT I WAS TRYING TO FIGURE OUT WHAT IT'S REALLY WHEN SOMEBODY SAYS AN ATHLETIC TRAINING FIELD, I CAN PICTURE SOMETHING COMPLETELY DIFFERENT, AND I COMPLETE A I CONSIDER A SECONDARY.
RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE AS A POTENTIAL BUSINESS BEING RUN OUT OF THERE.
AND SO THAT'S KIND OF WHAT I AND THANK YOU FOR CLARIFYING.
BUT THAT'S IMMEDIATELY JUMPED INTO MY HEAD.
WHEN YOU START TALKING ABOUT A TRAINING FIELD, THAT'S NOT WHAT YOU BUILD FOR KIDS, RIGHT? I MEAN, IF THEY'RE YOUNG, NO, THIS WOULD NOT AT ALL BE A BUSINESS.
WELL I DON'T, I DON'T THINK I MEAN THIS IS ZONING PD ZONING FOR RESIDENTIAL ONLY.
SO THAT KIND OF USE IS NOT ALLOWED THROUGH THE ZONING.
SO I THINK THAT'S YOUR PROTECTION IN THAT I'D VOLUNTEER TO BE THE MOTHER IN LAW THE SECOND ME DO.
BUT YEAH, IT SOUNDS I MEAN, IF IT'S ALL DONE, LIKE I WOULD, YOU KNOW, ENVISION A OF RESIDENTIAL BE.
IT'S JUST THAT THE WAY IT IS WORDED, IT SOUNDS LIKE IT COULD BE POTENTIALLY A COMMERCIAL ENTITY IN THERE THAT DOES NOT KNOW THE NEIGHBORS WOULD NOT BE HAPPY WITH IT.
NO, THAT IS NOT THE INTENTION AT ALL.
AND I DON'T THINK THAT WOULD BE ALLOWED WITH THE RESIDENTIAL ZONING.
I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE, LIKE IN THE FROM PLANNING AND ZONING, THAT WE'VE GOT ALL THE PROTECTIONS IN THERE FOR THE NEIGHBORS TO ENSURE THAT IT IS THAT SURE FLAVOR. THANK YOU.
CAN I HAVE A MOTION? TO OPEN AND CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.
OH, I'M SORRY, THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING.
DOES ANYBODY HAVE ANY COMMENTS THEY WOULD LIKE TO BRING FORWARD? SEEING NONE, I CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.
NOW, MAY I HAVE A MOTION? MOTION TO APPROVE.
THANK YOU. THE MOTION. THANK YOU.
OKAY. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. AYE. OKAY.
[G. SUMMARY OF TOWN COUNCIL ACTIONS]
NEXT ON THE AGENDA IS ITEM G.SUMMARY OF TOWN COUNCIL ACTIONS.
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSIONERS.
[I. STAFF ANNOUNCEMENTS]
ADAM. I STAFF ANNOUNCEMENTS.MR. VICE CHAIR. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSIONERS.
MRS. BIDDLE ALLUDED TO THIS EARLIER.
THERE ARE SOME AMENDMENTS THAT WE WILL BE BRINGING FORWARD TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION, AS WELL AS TO THE TOWN COUNCIL THAT ARE INTENDED TO HELP EXPEDITE THE DEVELOPMENT, REVIEW AND APPROVAL PROCESS, AS WELL AS TO CLARIFY SOME THINGS WITH RESPECT TO PLANNING.
THE STATE LEGISLATURE WAS QUITE BUSY IN 2023, AND THEY REVISED A LOT OF THE PROVISIONS IN CHAPTER 212 OF THE TEXAS LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE CONCERNING PLATS.
SO WE DO ANTICIPATE BRINGING AN ORDINANCE TO THE TOWN COUNCIL IN OCTOBER THAT WILL ALLOW STAFF TIME TO GO THROUGH AND MAKE RED LINES TO THE PLANNING REQUIREMENTS.
I THINK THAT IS IN CHAPTER 82 OF THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE, AND WE WOULD ALSO LIKE TO BRING SOME PROVISIONS FORWARD AS WELL THAT DEALS WITH MODIFICATIONS TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS.
I'LL PAUSE THERE TO OR ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU MIGHT HAVE.
[J. REVIEW MEETING CALENDAR TO ADD, AMEND OR CANCEL MEETINGS AS NEEDED]
HEY, YOU.MEETING CALENDAR AND ADD AMENDMENTS OR CANCEL MEETINGS AS NEEDED.
ADJOURNMENT. WE JUST WANT TO POINT OUT THAT THE NEXT MEETING IS SCHEDULED FOR OCTOBER 8TH.
[00:25:02]
AND ADAM KAY.ADJOURNMENT. ANY OTHER COMMENTS? ANYONE? OKAY.
MEETING IS ADJOURNED.
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.