[00:00:02] Y'ALL READY? GOOD EVENING, AND WELCOME TO THE WESTLAKE TOWN COUNCIL BOARD OF TRUSTEES MEETING [A. CALL REGULAR MEETING TO ORDER AND ANNOUNCE A QUORUM PRESENT] FOR JANUARY 21ST, 2025. I CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER AT 4:00 PM. WE HAVE A QUORUM. THIS EVENING'S INVOCATION WILL BE LED BY PASTOR NICK BARADELLO. DID I SAY THAT RIGHT? EXCELLENT. ABIDING GRACE LUTHERAN CHURCH IN SOUTHLAKE. THANK YOU FOR BEING HERE. HONORED TO BE HERE. LET US PRAY. DEAR LORD, WE GIVE YOU THANKS FOR THIS DAY AND FOR THESE PEOPLE, FOR THESE SERVANTS WHO ARE SETTING ASIDE THEIR TIME TO HELP SERVE YOUR PEOPLE. WE GIVE YOU THANKS FOR OUR SERVANTS ALL OVER THIS GREAT COUNTRY. WE PRAY THAT AS THEY GATHER TO MAKE DECISIONS, LORD, THAT YOUR SPIRIT WOULD BE UPON THEM, THAT YOU WOULD GIVE THEM WISDOM, THAT YOU WOULD GIVE THEM UNDERSTANDING, THAT THEIR WORDS WOULD BE YOUR WORDS, THAT THEIR IDEAS WOULD BE YOUR IDEAS AND THAT THEIR DECISIONS WOULD BE YOUR DECISIONS. WE GIVE YOU THANKS FOR ALL THE GOOD THINGS IN LIFE AND PRAY THAT YOU CONTINUE TO BLESS US IN JESUS NAME. AMEN. THANK YOU. AGAIN, THANKS FOR BEING HERE. PLEASE RISE AND JOIN ME TO RECITE THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE .[INAUDIBLE]. SO I HAVE THE HONOR TODAY. SORRY, EVERYONE. I'M NOT DOCTOR RICHIE, BUT I'LL DO THE BEST I CAN. SO I HAVE THE PRIVILEGE OF INTRODUCING THE BUGARIN FAMILY. SO I HAVE CECILIA. SHE'S IN GRADE FIVE. SHE'S READY TO COME OVER TO SECONDARY NEXT YEAR. SHE HAS A LARGE INTEREST IN THE US NAVY YOUTH PROGRAM, AND SHE LOVES ART AND RUNNING CROSS COUNTRY. I ALSO HAVE THE PLEASURE OF INTRODUCING MY NEW FRIEND HERE, ISAIAH BUGARIN, AND HE'S VERY OUTGOING AND LOVES GAMING. THE PLEDGE. TEXAS PLEDGE] . THANK YOU ALL. DO WE HAVE ANY CITIZEN OR PARENT COMMENTS? I DO NOT THINK WE DO. SO, ITEMS OF COMMUNITY INTEREST. [D.1. Items of Community Interest (Communications Director Jon Sasser)] MR. SASSER. GOOD AFTERNOON MAYOR. GOOD AFTERNOON. COUNCIL. WE'VE GOT A BRIEF ONE TODAY. WE'LL START OFF WITH THE RED CROSS BLOOD DRIVE HAPPENING AT THE ACADEMY ON MONDAY THE 27TH FROM 7AM TO 2:30. THAT'S GOING TO BE HELD IN THE FIELD HOUSE. THERE IS GOING TO BE A SIGN UP LINK SENT OUT TO EVERYONE. SO IF YOU'RE INTERESTED IN TAKING PART IN THAT, THERE WON'T BE ANY WALK UPS. SO YOU CAN SIGN UP FOR A DATE AND TIME AND COME IN AND DONATE BLOOD. AGAIN, THAT'S ON MONDAY, JANUARY 27TH FROM 7 TO 2:30. OUR NEXT TOWN COUNCIL MEETING IS ON FEBRUARY 3RD AT 4PM. OUR NEXT PLANNING AND ZONING MEETING IS THE NEXT DAY ON FEBRUARY 4TH, TUESDAY AT 5PM. MUNICIPAL COURT AND TOWN HALL WILL BE CLOSED FOR PRESIDENTS DAY MONDAY, FEBRUARY 17TH. AND THAT'S GOING TO BUMP OUR TOWN COUNCIL MEETING TO THE VERY NEXT DAY USUALLY OBVIOUSLY THERE ON MONDAY, MUCH LIKE TODAY. IT WAS MOVED BECAUSE OF THE HOLIDAY. SO AGAIN, OUR TOWN COUNCIL MEETING WILL BE ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 18TH. AND ONE FINAL NOTE I'D BE REMISS IF I DIDN'T RECOGNIZE A FEW FOLKS HERE FOR AN OUTSTANDING JOB THAT THEY DID DURING THE WINTER WEATHER STORM. OUR PUBLIC WORKS TEAM, OUR FIRE DEPARTMENT, AS WELL AS OUR KELLER POLICE DEPARTMENT JUST DID A PHENOMENAL JOB. YOU KNOW, WHILE EVERYBODY'S SAFE IN THEIR HOMES, THESE GUYS ARE OUT ON ON SLICK STREETS AND KEEPING US ALL INFORMED AND KEEPING US SAFE. THOSE GUYS WORKED AROUND THE CLOCK AND RESPONDED. THEY WERE AN INTEGRAL PART. EACH AND EVERY DEPARTMENT WAS AN INTEGRAL PART IN KEEPING EVERYBODY UP TO DATE AND HELPING THE COMMUNICATIONS TEAM GET ALL THE INFORMATION. OUT AND KEEP EVERYBODY UP TO DATE. SO IF IT WASN'T FOR THOSE GUYS, YOU KNOW, WE'D BE LESS INFORMED AND LESS SAFE. [00:05:06] SO KUDOS TO ALL OF THOSE GUYS. THOSE ARE OUR ITEMS OF COMMUNITY INTEREST. JON I WANT TO THANK YOU AS WELL FOR THE JOB YOU DID AT COMMUNICATIONS. THANK YOU. OKAY, SO THIS EVENING, I JUST WANT TO TAKE A MINUTE TO THANK SCOTT AND KELLY BRADLEY FOR COMING TO. COUNCIL AND VISITING WITH US TODAY. YOU KNOW, THERE'S AN OLD GREEK PROVERB THAT SAYS. MEN SHOULD PLANT TREES UNDER WHOSE SHADE THEY WILL NEVER SIT TO ENJOY AND OVER 30 YEARS AGO, THE BRADLEY'S ENVISIONED NOT ONLY THIS TOWN AS A BEAUTIFUL TOWN WITH BEAUTIFUL LANDSCAPES AND BEAUTIFUL HOMES AND CORPORATE CAMPUSES FOR HEADQUARTERS NATIONALLY. BUT THEY ALSO ENVISIONED WESTLAKE ACADEMY AND I AM SO DELIGHTED THAT THEY ARE STILL HERE. PART OF THE WESTLAKE FAMILY TO ENJOY THE SHADE THAT THEY CREATED OVER 30 YEARS AGO. THANKS FOR BEING HERE, NO DOUBT. WELCOME Y'ALL. IT'S GREAT TO SEE YOU. OKAY, NEXT ON THE AGENDA, THE PRESENTATION, THE TEXAS STUDENT HOUSING ANNUAL REPORT. [E. PRESENTATION] TRACY, THANKS FOR BEING HERE. HELLO. MY NAME IS TRACY HARO, AND I'M THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF TEXAS STUDENT HOUSING AUTHORITY. JUST A REAL QUICK BACKGROUND. IN 2013, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS BY MAYOR AND IN 2015. THANK YOU. NOT TOO TALL. AND THEN IN 2015, THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR RETIRED AND I TOOK HIS JOB IN 2015. SO I'VE BEEN THERE NINE YEARS NOW AS A DIRECTOR. SO A LITTLE BIT ABOUT WHAT TEXAS STUDENT HOUSING AUTHORITY DOES. THE OVERVIEW. WE WERE CHARTERED IN 1995 UNDER THE CHAPTER 53 OF 53 OF THE HIGHER EDUCATION ACT. FOR PURPOSES OF ACQUIRING STUDENT HOUSING FACILITIES, TSHA IS THE BEGINNING ACQUIRED THREE STUDENT HOUSING FACILITIES IN COLLEGE STATION WITH TAX EXEMPT BONDS THAT DO NOT OBLIGATE THE TOWN OF WESTLAKE. SUBSEQUENTLY, THOSE PROPERTIES WERE RELINQUISHED AND TSHA CONSTRUCTED CAMBRIDGE HALL IN COLLEGE STATION, WHICH WE CURRENTLY HAVE TODAY. LATER, TSHA ACQUIRED FACILITIES IN SAN MARCOS, DENTON, WICHITA FALLS AND MIDLAND, AND ALONG WITH AUSTIN IN 2003. CHAPTER 53 WAS AMENDED TO SUCH A WAY THAT TSHA COULD NOT THEREAFTER ACQUIRE ANY ADDITIONAL PROPERTIES IN THE FUTURE, EXCEPT IN WESTLAKE. TSHA CURRENTLY OWNS COLLEGE CAMBRIDGE HALL IN COLLEGE STATION AND THE RIDGE OF NORTH TEXAS IN DENTON. TO DATE, TSHA HAS CONTRIBUTED $950,000 TO WESTLAKE ACADEMY. SCHOLARSHIPS AWARDED SINCE 2015 TO JUST WESTLAKE ACADEMY STUDENTS WAS 116 TO DATE VALUED AT $783,000. ALL WESTLAKE ACADEMY STUDENTS ARE OFFERED A FULL SCHOLARSHIP FOR EITHER COLLEGE STATION OR DENTON. THE OTHER SCHOLARSHIPS ARE INCREMENTAL SCHOLARSHIPS THAT ARE OFFERED TO ALL QUALIFYING STUDENTS ACROSS THE STATE OF TEXAS, AND THEY ARE $2,500 A YEAR AND ARE GENERALLY AWARDED FOR UP TO FOUR YEARS. SINCE 1995, WE HAVE AWARDED OVER 3000 HOUSING SCHOLARSHIPS TO TEXAS HIGH SCHOOL GRADUATES IN FULL HOUSING. SCHOLARSHIPS FOR WESTLAKE ACADEMY VARY IN VALUE FROM AROUND 6000 TO 9000 PER YEAR. IT DEPENDS ON WHICH PROPERTY THE STUDENT CHOOSES, EITHER DENTON OR COLLEGE STATION. THEY CAN BE AWARDED FOR UP TO FOUR YEARS AT EITHER LOCATION. CURRENTLY FOR THIS YEAR, OUR FISCAL YEAR RUNS FROM SEPTEMBER TO AUGUST. SO THIS 2024, 2025 IS OUR LAST FALL SEMESTER AND FOR THIS SPRING SEMESTER, WE CURRENTLY HAVE 38 SCHOLARSHIP STUDENTS LIVING AT CAMBRIDGE HALL, FOUR OF WHICH ARE WESTLAKE ACADEMY STUDENTS AT THE RIDGE. WE HAVE 12 STUDENTS THAT ARE CURRENTLY ON SCHOLARSHIP THERE, AND ONE OF THOSE IS A WESTLAKE ACADEMY STUDENT. HERE'S OUR BOARD MEMBERS. AS YOU ALL KNOW WHO SCOTT BRADLEY IS, HE'S HERE. HE'S OUR PRESIDENT AND THEN THE REMAINING DIRECTORS. AND WE DO HAVE ONE OPEN BOARD POSITION. IF ANYBODY'S INTERESTED, LET ME KNOW. CAMBRIDGE HALL AT COLLEGE STATION. HERE'S A PHOTOGRAPH OF IT. THE OUTSIDE HAS ALL BEEN REDONE. IT CONSISTS OF 198 UNITS AND WE HAVE 530 BEDS. IT WAS COMPLETELY RENOVATED IN 2024. IT'S A GATED COMMUNITY THAT INCLUDES TWO POOLS, A MOVIE THEATER, DINING HALL, A FITNESS CENTER, YOGA STUDIO, A STUDY LOUNGE, AND A GAME ROOM ALL STATE OF THE ART FOR STUDENTS. THERE'S SOME PICTURES HERE OF WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE INSIDE AFTER THE RENOVATIONS. JUST THE ROOMS AND THE DINING HALL AND EVERYTHING. OUR OTHER. CAN I ASK YOU A QUESTION? SURE. THAT'S AN INCREDIBLE RENOVATION. THAT'S AN INCREDIBLE RENOVATION. ESPECIALLY WHAT IT, YOU KNOW, USED TO BE. SO I WAS JUST CURIOUS, HOW DID YOU GUYS UNDERTAKE SUCH A HUGE RENOVATION? WE HAVE A SHORT VERSION. WELL, LIKE, SORT OF LIKE A BONDHOLDER THAT BASICALLY CAME IN AND TOOK OVER THE PROPERTY, [00:10:02] AND THEY BASICALLY PUT $15 MILLION INTO THE PROPERTY TO RENOVATE IT. GORGEOUS. THANK YOU. [INAUDIBLE]. THE RIGID NORTH TEXAS. IT CONSISTS OF 288 UNITS. IT'S 876 BEDS. WE REMODELED BUILDING 13 AND BUILDING SIX THIS PAST YEAR. EXPLORING. WE ARE STILL IN THE PROCESS OF EXPLORING REFINANCING OF THE SENIOR DEBT TO RENOVATE THE REMAINDER OF THE PROPERTY. MORGAN STANLEY OWNS SENIOR DEBT ON THAT PROPERTY IN 2022. TXDOT ACQUIRED TWO SMALL PARCELS OF THE LAND VIA EMINENT DOMAIN FOR THE EXPANSION OF I-35. THE FINAL SETTLEMENT FROM TXDOT WITH TXDOT WAS COMPLETED IN 2024. AND THEN THIS PICTURES OF THE RIDGE AND AGAIN, WE WOULD LIKE TO REMODEL THE ENTIRE PROPERTY. POSSIBLE. ANY QUESTIONS? BEAUTIFUL. ALL RIGHT. SCOTT, DO YOU WANT TO SAY ANYTHING? OKAY. THANK YOU ALL. WADE, ONE THING I WOULD REQUEST IS I. SO I'VE BEEN ON. THIS IS MY. ANNA YOU'VE BEEN ON COUNCIL FOUR YEARS? CORRECT. I MEAN, COMING IN MY THIRD YEAR, I WOULD LOVE TO GET A WORK SESSION AT SOME POINT IN TIME. I WANT TO MAKE SURE WE'RE GOOD PARTNERS AND DOING WHAT WE NEED TO FOR THIS. I KNOW, MOST OF THE KIDS THAT GRADUATE THESE DAYS, AND I KNOW WE HAVE A LOT OF STUDENTS THAT ARE USING THIS, BUT I MIGHT ASK WADE TO PUT TOGETHER A WORK SESSION JUST AGAIN, TO KIND OF GET THIS RELATIONSHIP A LITTLE CLOSER AND SEE IF YOU GUYS NEED ANYTHING FROM US. PERFECT. WE'LL MAKE IT HAPPEN. THANK YOU, SIR. GOING ON NEXT TO THE AGENDA. THANK YOU VERY MUCH, TERRY. THANKS FOR BEING HERE. CONSENT AGENDA. [F. CONSENT AGENDA] DOES ANYBODY ANYTHING NEED TO BE DISCUSSED ON THE CONSENT AGENDA? CAN I GET A MOTION TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA? SO MOVED. AND A SECOND? SECOND. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. ANY OPPOSED? DIANA. AND AM I ALLOWED TO TALK ABOUT THIS AFTER WE PASSED IT? CAN I MAKE A COMMENT ABOUT ONE OF THESE ISSUES? THE CONSENT AGENDA. OKAY. WE JUST GOT SOME THERE'S SOME COMMUNICATION GOING AROUND ABOUT THE ATHLETIC STIPEND. AND THIS IS BASICALLY, WE HAD SET UP SEVERAL STIPENDS YEARS AGO WHEN WE INCREASED THEM THREE YEARS AGO. WE HAVE NOT HAD A GIRLS SOFTBALL TEAM. WE GAUGE SOME INTEREST IN IT LAST YEAR AND WE DIDN'T HAVE ENOUGH INTEREST. SO WE LITERALLY ARE TAKING THAT STIPEND TO MOVE OVER TO HAVE CHEERLEADING. CHEERLEADING HAS LITERALLY BEEN BASICALLY FOOTBALL SEASON, BUT NOW WE HAVE THEM IN THE GYM FOR VOLLEYBALL AND BASKETBALL, AND LAST WEEK'S GAME WAS JUST UNBELIEVABLE WITH THEM BEING THERE. THEY DID A WONDERFUL JOB. SO WE WILL STILL HAVE THAT STIPEND GOING FORWARD JUST BUT WE DID GET SOME INQUIRIES. SO THANKS. OKAY. YOU'RE WELCOME. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS. [G.1. Discuss, consider and act to adopt Ordinance 1018 approving architectural standards and an architectural pattern book for the Villaggio Residential Development.] AGENDA ITEM G ONE. DISCUSS. CONSIDER AN ACT. ADOPT ORDINANCE 1018 ADOPTING ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS AND ARCHITECTURAL PATTERN BOOK FOR THE BELLAGIO RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT. MR. ALEXANDER. THANK YOU, HONORABLE MAYOR, TOWN COUNCIL. GOOD EVENING. THE ITEM BEFORE YOU IS A REQUIREMENT FROM THE PD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT FOR BELLAGIO, WHICH REQUIRES ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS AND THERE IS AN ARCHITECTURAL PATTERN BOOK THAT IS ALSO INCLUDED AS PART OF THIS SUBMITTAL FOR YOUR REVIEW, CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE ACTION. IT STEMS FROM ON FEBRUARY 27TH, 2023, ORDINANCE NUMBER 965. IT REQUIRED THAT ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS COME BEFORE YOU AS A BODY FOR YOUR REVIEW AND APPROVAL. THOSE SAME RULES AND REGULATIONS WITHIN THE PD FOR THE ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS ALSO REQUIRE THAT THEY COME FROM THE WESTLAKE BUILDING QUALITY MANUAL. THE ARCHITECTURAL SANDERS HAS PROPOSED, AND AS PRESENTED, THEY DO CAPTURE WHAT IS IN THE BUILDING QUALITY MANUAL AND IF I MAY ALSO ADD THAT THEY DO REFLECT A COLLABORATION BETWEEN THE DEVELOPER AND THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT, AND IN PARTICULAR, EXHIBIT A IS REALLY A VERY CONCISE SET OF THE KEY RULES AND REGULATIONS FOR THE PD TO DESIGN THE HOMES THAT WILL ALLOW FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT TO QUICKLY REVIEW AND APPROVE THE PLANS AS SUBMITTED, AND THE ARCHITECTURAL SANDERS. THEY DO FOCUS PRIMARILY ON MATERIALS, CONFIGURATIONS, AND TECHNIQUES FOR BUILDING WALLS, ROOFS, OPENINGS, ATTACHMENTS, AND LANDSCAPING. SO ESSENTIALLY THE ENTIRE ARCHITECTURAL COMPOSITION, PLUS THE TREES AND OTHER VEGETATION TO ENSURE THAT THE DEVELOPMENT LIVES UP TO THE STANDARDS THAT ARE CONTAINED WITHIN THE PD PLAN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AND TO THAT END, [00:15:04] THE IMAGE IN FRONT OF YOU SHOWS A NUMBER OF DOORS, AS WELL AS AN EXAMPLE OF A WINDOW OPENING AND SHOWING HOW THE ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS WERE PUT TOGETHER AND THE ARCHITECTURAL PATTERN BOOK. THERE'S A SIMPLE MASSING DIAGRAM IN THE MIDDLE, AND THAT COMBINED WITH THE DOORS AND WITH THE WINDOWS AND WITH THE EXTERIOR FINISH, WILL ENSURE THAT THERE IS AN ARCHITECTURAL COMPOSITION THAT IS NOT ONLY ESTHETICALLY PLEASING, BUT AGAIN, MATCHES THOSE STANDARDS ARE WITHIN THE PD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT FOR BELLAGIO, AND YIELDS EXAMPLES SUCH AS THIS THAT START TO INFORM THE SITE PLANS THAT ARE THEN SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL. IN SUM, THESE ARCHITECTURAL CENTERS ARE CONSISTENT WITH THE WESTLAKE BUILDING QUALITY MANUAL, AND IN SOME INSTANCES THEY DO GO ABOVE AND BEYOND WHAT IS REQUIRED BY THE BUILDING QUALITY MANUAL. THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DOES RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS AND THE PATTERN BOOK AS PRESENTED. I'LL PAUSE THERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS TOWN COUNCIL MAY HAVE, AND THE APPLICANT IS ALSO PRESENT IF THERE ARE QUESTIONS FOR THEM. CORRECT. ANY QUESTIONS FROM COUNCIL? I WOULD JUST COMMENT THAT I REALLY APPRECIATE THE THOROUGHNESS OF THIS. IT'S ONE, YOU KNOW, IT'S JUST WONDERFULLY LAID OUT AND IT'S VERY CLEAR. YEAH I AGREE. IT WAS BEAUTIFULLY DONE. HELLO, MIKE. CAN I GET A MOTION TO APPROVE ORDINANCE 1018? SO MOVED. CAN I GET A SECOND? SECOND. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. ANY OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES. THANK YOU ALL FOR BEING HERE. THAT WAS EASY. THANK YOU ALL VERY MUCH. THANKS, JASON. MR. CARROLL, I THINK WE'RE GOING TO PUT A HOLD ON AGENDA ITEM G THREE. IF YOU'D LIKE TO READ THE ITEM, AND THEN WE'LL GO IN EXECUTIVE SESSION FOR THE. OKAY DISCUSS CONSENT, AN ACT TO APPROVE THE PURCHASE OF A NEW FIRE ENGINE NOT TO EXCEED $1.3 MILLION. I'M SORRY. ON THAT ITEM. YES, SIR. THE STAFF WOULD LIKE TO PULL THAT ITEM FOR. OH, I'M SORRY, G2. I'M SORRY I JUMPED AHEAD. I'M JUST KIND OF. OH. FREUDIAN SLIP. DISCUSS. CONSIDERED AGENDA ITEM G2 DISCUSS. [G.2. Discuss, consider and act to approve Resolution 25-04 approving a Development Agreement between the Town of Westlake, Texas and Otter Partners, LP, for subdivision improvements for Westlake Ventanas, a residential development to be designed and built in adjacency to Solana Boulevard. (Jason Alexander, AICP, CEcD, Deputy Town Manager)] CONSIDER AND ACT TO APPROVE RESOLUTION 25-04, APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE TOWN OF WESTLAKE, TEXAS AND OTTER PARTNERS LP FOR DESIGNED AND BUILD TO AN ADJACENCY TO SOLANA BOULEVARD. MR. ALEXANDER. THANK YOU MAYOR. THIS IS A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR WESTLAKE VENTANAS THAT IS PRESENTED TO YOU ALL THIS EVENING. IT IS REQUIRED AS PART OF THE PD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT FOR ENTRADA, WHICH THIS DEVELOPMENT IS UNDER. THE TERMS OF THE DEVELOPMENT, THERE ARE MULTIPLE ORDINANCES THAT CAME BEFORE THE TOWN COUNCIL FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL THAT WOULD PAVE THE WAY FOR WESTLAKE, LIKE VENTANAS TO GO FROM CONCEPTION TO REALITY. AGAIN, THE WESTLAKE VENTANAS. DEVELOPMENT. IT IS A PART OF THE ENTRADA PLAN DEVELOPMENT, AND PURSUANT TO THOSE MULTIPLE ORDINANCES THAT WERE APPROVED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL, THE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF DETACHED SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS THAT MAY BE CONSTRUCTED IS 51. THIS IS JUST AN OVERALL SITE PLAN, AND IT IS THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN THAT HAS BEEN APPROVED FOR ENTRADA, GENERALLY SHOWING THE LAYOUT OF VENTANAS WESTLAKE. AND YOU CAN SEE THAT AT WE'LL CALL IT THE LOWER CENTER HALF OF THE SCREEN. OKAY. AND HERE ARE SOME PHOTOGRAPHS ARE GENERALLY SHOWING THE PROPERTY FROM DIFFERENT ANGLES. GOT THE CLICKER WORKING AGAIN THERE. AND IN TERMS OF THE AGREEMENT, AGAIN PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS IN SECTION 102-316 OF THE TOWN OF WESTLAKE CODE OF ORDINANCES. A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT IS REQUIRED FOR ALL PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS. SUCH WOULD BE THE SAME HERE. THE PURPOSE OF THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT IS TO ENSURE THAT IF THERE IS ANY COST SHARING FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS, THAT IS WITHIN THE AGREEMENT. THE TIMING OF THOSE IMPROVEMENTS ARE ALSO PROVIDED WITHIN THE AGREEMENT AND IF THERE'S OPEN SPACE THAT'S PROVIDED AND [00:20:07] ANY OTHER CONSIDERATIONS TO FACILITATE THE DEVELOPMENT IN WESTLAKE, AND THAT IS COMING AS A SUMMARY OF THOSE PROVISIONS IN SECTION 102-316. THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AS PRESENTED THIS EVENING FOR WESTLAKE VENTANAS IS BETWEEN THE TOWN OF WESTLAKE AND OTTER PARTNERS LP. SOME OF THE KEY TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT IS THAT THERE BE A LEFT TURNING LANE AND SORT ALONG EASTBOUND ON THE BOULEVARD. THAT ALL IMPACTS ON THE WESTLAKE ACADEMY, THAT THERE WILL BE $10,000 PER RESIDENTIAL LOT THAT HAS ALREADY BEEN ADDRESSED, AND THAT ALL GRADING COMPLY WITH APPLICABLE PROVISIONS FOUND IN CHAPTER 36 OF THE TOWN OF WESTLAKE. CODE OF ORDINANCES. OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS INCLUDE THE ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS THAT WOULD ALSO INCLUDE THE EXTERIOR FINISH THAT REFLECT THE SAME PROVISIONS THAT ARE CONTAINED FOR THE NOSE, WHICH IS A RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY THAT IS STILL UNDER CONSTRUCTION, BUT THERE HAS BEEN A FAIR AMOUNT OF DEVELOPMENT TO GIVE A REALLY GOOD IDEA ESTHETICALLY, OF WHAT THOSE STANDARDS WILL PRODUCE. THERE IS ALSO THE PROVISION THAT GARAGE DOORS FACING A FRONT LOT LINE, SHOULD THEY BE SET BACK A MINIMUM OF TEN FEET SO THAT ALL VIEW CORRIDORS TO ENSURE THE ENSURE THE SAFETY OF RESIDENTS BACKING OUT OF DRIVEWAYS ARE PROVIDED ON EACH LOT, AND THAT'S AS REQUIRED BY ORDINANCE 1001, APPROVED BY TOWN COUNCIL. AND I DO WANT TO CLARIFY HERE THAT IN ORDINANCE 1001, THAT THE QUOTE IS THE ACTUAL VERBIAGE THAT COMES FROM ORDINANCE NUMBER 1001, AND THAT A MINIMUM OF TEN FEET IS WHAT THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT IS RECOMMENDING TO ENSURE THE SAFETY OF RESIDENTS BACKING OUT OF DRIVEWAYS AND JUST TO PHOTOGRAPH SHOWING THE GENERAL ARCHITECTURAL STYLE OF THE NOSE. THE NOSE ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS. IT SHOULD BE NOTED IT DOES CONTAIN PROVISIONS FOR BUILDING SETBACKS. THAT IS WITHIN THE GUIDELINES. IT IS NOT SEPARATE FROM THE ACTUAL PD STANDARDS, BUT IT IS WITHIN THOSE DESIGN GUIDELINES AND BECAUSE IT'S WITHIN THOSE DESIGN GUIDELINES, IT MAY NOT BE ENTIRELY CONSISTENT WITH THE ARCHITECTURAL INTENT AND IMPACT THAT THE DEVELOPER MAY HAVE FOR THIS PROPERTY, AND THAT COULD ALSO HAVE SOME INFLUENCES ON THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCESS WITH RESPECT TO APPLYING THE KNOWLES ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS AND OTHER REQUIREMENTS FROM THE ENTRADA PD PLAN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AND THE BASE REQUIREMENTS OF TOWN OF WESTLAKE CODE OF ORDINANCES. THOSE BUILDING SETBACKS. AGAIN, THEY MAY ALSO IMPACT THE TOTAL NUMBER OF RESIDENTIAL UNITS THAT MAY BE CONSTRUCTED BASED OFF OF THE STANDARDS FOR THE KNOWLES. SOME ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS MENTIONED EARLIER WAS THAT LEFT HAND TURNING LANE ON EASTBOUND SOLANO BOULEVARD, AND AGAIN, THE DESIRE THERE IS TO ENSURE THAT VEHICLE QUEUING DOES NOT OCCUR IN FRONT OF THE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, AND THAT THERE IS A SAFE AND EFFICIENT FLOW OF TRAFFIC ALONG SOLANO BOULEVARD, NOT JUST FOR TODAY, BUT THINKING LONG TERM IN TERMS OF THE GROWTH THAT IS ANTICIPATED AND EXPECTED TO HAVE A POSITIVE INFLUENCE ON WESTLAKE. AND FINALLY, IN TERMS OF THAT EVERGREEN ROW OF HEDGING THAT WOULD BE PROVIDED ALONG THE PRIVATE DRIVE. AND THAT'S COMING INTO TOWN HALL AND THE PURPOSE OF THAT IS JUST TO GIVE SOME PRIVACY TO THE REAR YARDS, SO THAT THE RESIDENTS THAT HAVE LOTS THAT BORDER THAT DRIVEWAY, THEY'VE GOT PRIVACY TO TAKE CARE OF, ACTIVITIES THAT THEY WOULD WANT TO DO TO ENJOY THEIR HOMES AND TO ENSURE THAT THERE AREN'T THINGS THAT MAYBE OTHERS WOULD NOT BE DESIROUS OF SEEING IN TERMS OF DRIVING TO TOWN HALL AND THEN FINALLY JUST WANTED TO REINFORCE THOSE VISIBILITY TRIANGLES PURSUANT TO ORDINANCE 1001. SO IN SUM, THERE ARE ELEMENTS OF THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT THAT POTENTIALLY COULD BE FURTHER CLARIFIED AND IMPROVED TO ENSURE THAT THERE IS A PREDICTABLE AND EFFICIENT AND EXPEDITED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCESS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT AND ALTHOUGH THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DOES RECOMMEND APPROVAL, CONSIDERING THAT EVERGREEN HEDGE ROW A MINIMUM OF 36IN IN HEIGHT AT THE TIME OF PLANNING OR PLANTING, AND THAT WILL REACH A MINIMUM HEIGHT OF SIX FEET AT THE TIME OF MATURITY BE PROVIDED. THERE MAY BE ADDITIONAL AMENDMENTS THAT MAY COME FROM TOWN COUNCIL AS PART OF CONSIDERATION FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT THIS EVENING AND WITH THAT, I WILL PAUSE THERE. I DO BELIEVE THAT THE DEVELOPER IS PRESENT, AND I AM AVAILABLE TO ANSWER QUESTIONS THAT YOU MAY HAVE, AS WELL AS THE DEVELOPER. JASON, ONE THING YES, SIR. PLEASE HELP US WITH, I WANT TO MAKE SURE WE PINPOINT EXACTLY WHAT WE'RE TRYING TO SOLVE FOR DURING THIS DISCUSSION. [00:25:02] RIGHT? YES, SIR. I THINK THERE'S JUST A HANDFUL OF THINGS I DON'T WANT US TO GO OFF, BUT HELP US KEEP REALLY FOCUSED ON THE THINGS THAT THIS COUNCIL NEEDS TO MAKE A DECISION. YES, SIR. THANK YOU. AND THOSE ITEMS, IF I MAY, MAYOR, ARE DEALING WITH THE BUILDING SETBACKS AND THE ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS. BUT OPEN UP FOR QUESTIONS NOW. TO CLARIFY THE ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS. THAT'S SEPARATE FROM THE SETBACKS ON THE BUILDINGS. RIGHT. SOMEWHAT. BUT THE ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS FOR THE KNOLLS, IT DOES CONTAIN THOSE PROVISIONS FOR BUILDING SETBACKS. THAT'S IN THE ACTUAL DESIGN GUIDELINES. THAT'S ONE AND THE SAME FOR YOU. YES, MA'AM. OKAY. JUST WANTED TO CLARIFY. SO YEAH. JASON, I WAS CONFUSED. THE REQUIREMENT OF THE TEN FOOT GARAGE SETBACKS, I JUST, I FOUND THAT CONFUSING, GIVEN THAT THE DESIGN GUIDELINES ARE 30 FOOT SETBACKS. SO MAYBE YOU COULD UNTANGLE THAT FOR ME A LITTLE BIT. YES, SIR AND THAT IS TO THE EXTENT WE'RE ADOPTING THE KNOWLES ARCHITECTURAL GUIDELINES IN FULL. YES, SIR AND CORRECT AND THAT WAS ONE OF THE REASONS FOR WANTING TO MAKE SURE THAT IS CLARIFIED WITHIN THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. WHICH BUILDING SETBACK REQUIREMENTS THAT WOULD BE GUIDING THE BUILDING PLANS THAT ARE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL. WOULD THAT BE THE 30 FOOT MINIMUM SETBACK REQUIRED PER THE NOS, WHICH ARE PART OF THE ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS, OR WOULD THAT BE A DIFFERENT SETBACK, WHICH WAS TEN FEET BECAUSE OF THE FACT THAT ENTRADA DOESN'T HAVE FRONT YARD SETBACK REQUIREMENTS, AND THAT WAS PART OF WANTING TO CLARIFY THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT TO MAKE SURE THAT THE BUILDING SETBACKS WERE UNIFORM IN TERMS OF HOW THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEWED THE SITE PLANS, IN TERMS OF HOW THE DEVELOPER SUBMITTED THEM. SO IT WAS JUST IF YOU CLARIFY FOR ME THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT THAT'S IN FRONT OF US. I HAVEN'T READ IT. I THOUGHT IT DEFERRED TO THE KNOLLS. IS IT IMPORTANT THAT WE BE MORE SPECIFIC IN THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT? YES, SIR. AND SO WHAT IS PROPOSED RIGHT NOW? ARE WE GOING TO USE THE USE THE KNOLLS AT 30 FOOT SETBACK OR SOMETHING ELSE? AND I THINK THAT'S WHERE WE WOULD WANT TO GET SOME ADDITIONAL CLARIFICATION, IS WHETHER TOWN COUNCIL WILL WANT TO USE THE KNOLLS OR WHAT HAS BEEN PROVIDED WITHIN THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR THE SETBACK, BECAUSE THE KEY PROVISION HERE IS JUST MAKING SURE THAT THE VISIBILITY TRIANGLE IS ENFORCED PURSUANT TO ORDINANCE 1001, AND THAT THERE IS ADEQUATE VISIBILITY AS CARS ARE BACKING OUT OF FUTURE HOMES WITHIN THIS DEVELOPMENT. SO THAT'S THE FIRST THING. AND THE SECOND THING IS CLARIFYING THAT THERE ARE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS IN THE ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS FOR THE KNOLLS THAT THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT WOULD BE BOUND BY IN TERMS OF REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF SITE PLANS AS THEY'RE SUBMITTED. BUT, JASON, TO BE SPECIFIC ABOUT THOSE ARCHITECTURAL REQUIREMENTS THAT YOU NEED TO REVIEW. CAN YOU JUST BE SPECIFIC? YES, MA'AM. SO WITH THE DESIGN GUIDELINES, THERE ARE SOME STANDARDS THAT ARE A BIT PERMISSIVE AND NOT DETERMINISTIC. SO IF WE LOOK AT THE DESIGN GUIDELINES THERE ARE SHOULDS AS OPPOSED TO SHALLS. AND WE WOULD LIKE TO HAVE CLARITY THERE. SURE. BUT ALSO ONE OF THOSE KEY PROVISIONS IS THAT SETBACK BECAUSE THAT DOES NOT ONLY AFFECT DENSITY BUT IT ALSO AFFECTS THE DESIGN OF HOMES. AND THAT'S WHAT WE WANT. WHAT I'M HEARING FROM YOU IS THAT THE MAIN POINT OF CLARIFICATION ON THE ARCHITECTURAL GUIDELINES IS WHETHER OR NOT WE HAVE 30 FOOT SETBACKS FOR THE BUILDINGS, TOTALLY SEPARATE FROM THE TEN FOOT DRIVEWAY. CORRECT. MR. SCELTA AND MISS WHITE. DOCTOR WHITE. I THINK WHEN WE'RE TALKING ABOUT THAT TEN FOOT SETBACK THAT IS NULL AND VOID IF WE ARE USING THE NOLLS SETBACK REQUIREMENTS. HOWEVER, OUR UNDERSTANDING IS THE IF WE WERE TO USE THE KNOLLS SETBACK REQUIREMENTS, THE APPLICANT WOULD NOT BE ABLE TO BUILD 51 HOMES WITH THOSE PROPER SETBACK REQUIREMENTS, AND WE'RE TRYING TO ALLOW FOR THAT TO HAPPEN. SO BY PUTTING THE TEN FOOT REQUIREMENT IN THE DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT, WE'RE SAYING THAT'S A MINIMUM AND THEN THE SETBACKS ARE ACTUALLY UP FOR DISCUSSION WITH THE DEVELOPER IF REQUIRED, OR IF COUNCIL WOULD LIKE TO MOVE FORWARD WITH THAT. SO AS I WAS GOING THROUGH AND REVIEWING THIS, I FOUND IT INCREDIBLY COMPLICATED AND CONFUSING. AND I THINK THE REASON IS BECAUSE THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT IS REFERENCING THE KNOLLS. BUT WHEN I READ THROUGH THE THE ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS FOR THE KNOLLS, I DON'T BELIEVE THAT THEY REPRESENT WHAT THE DEVELOPER WANTS IN THE DEVELOPMENT. SO THE PROBLEM IS, I THINK THAT WHAT WE NEED IS A COMPLETELY INDEPENDENT SET OF ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS FOR VENTANAS, NOT REFERENCING THE KNOLLS, BUT ACTUALLY HAVING SOMETHING SPECIFICALLY LAID OUT THAT LAYS OUT ALL THESE CHARACTERISTICS. [00:30:06] I UNDERSTAND THAT THERE POINT FROM THE ORIGINAL MEETING BACK IN APRIL OF 2020, FOR WHICH I WAS PART OF, WAS THAT THEY WANTED TO HAVE THE HOUSE STYLES IN THAT PLOT, BUT BECAUSE THEY DECIDED TO ADOPT THE ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS, IT'S PUT US IN THIS, YOU KNOW, REALLY CRAZY POSITION WHERE IF WE ADOPT THOSE STANDARDS, HE'S NOT GOING TO BE ABLE TO DO WHAT HE IS LOOKING TO DO. SO MY FEELING WOULD BE THAT WHAT WE NEED TO DO IS GO BACK, CREATE A COMPLETELY INDEPENDENT SET OF ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS FOR VENTANAS AS ON ITS OWN, AND THEN VOTE ON THAT. AND I THINK THAT WOULD THAT WOULD SOLVE AND ALLEVIATE ALL THESE PROBLEMS. CAN I ASK A QUESTION REAL QUICK? DOES THE DEVELOPER BELIEVE THAT THEY CAN USE THE ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS OF THE KNOLLS, MINUS THE SETBACKS, AND THEN CREATE SPECIFIC SETBACKS SPECIFIC TO THIS DEVELOPMENT? OR DO THEY WOULD THEY WANT TO CHANGE OTHER ITEMS OF THE ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS IF IT'S JUST ADAPTIVE SETBACKS, THAT'S PROBABLY A PRETTY EASY PROCESS TO LOOK AT, AND THEY PROBABLY KNOW WHAT THEY WANT. IF IT'S CHANGED A LOT MORE, WELL, THEN IT'S GOING TO BE A LOT EASIER, PROBABLY JUST TO CREATE A SEPARATE STANDARD. BUT I'M JUST TRYING TO MAKE IT EASY AND I THINK THAT'S THE PROBLEM IS THAT THE AMBIGUITY IS LIKE, OKAY, WHEN WE GO TO REVIEW SOMETHING IN THE FUTURE, WHY ARE WE USING THE ENTRADA STANDARDS? ARE WE USING THE NULL STANDARDS? ARE WE USING THIS? IT'S NOT STRAIGHTFORWARD. I MEAN, IF YOU LOOK AT WHAT WE JUST WERE PRESENTED FOR THE BELLAGIO, I MEAN THAT WAS VERY STRAIGHTFORWARD IN TERMS OF THESE ARE THE IDEAS. THIS IS WHAT YOU CAN DO AND IT WILL MAKE THE PROCESS OF REVIEWING VERY EASY. BUT I DON'T FEEL LIKE WE HAVE THAT WITH THIS PROJECT BECAUSE WE ARE REFERENCING A DOCUMENT THAT IS FOR A COMPLETELY DIFFERENT CIRCUMSTANCES. I MEAN, THE NOLS ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS REFERENCE ALL THIS, YOU KNOW, PRESERVING ALL THESE TREES AND THIS GREEN SPACE. AND THOSE ARE THINGS THAT WE DON'T EVEN HAVE IN VENTANA. SO I THINK THAT IT DOESN'T REALLY SERVE A PURPOSE TO DON'T YOU THINK IT MAKES IT MORE. IT MAKES IT MORE CONFUSING TO TRY TO REFERENCE A DOCUMENT THAT DOESN'T ACTUALLY APPLY. I'D LIKE TO TALK TO THE BUILDER AND JUST ASK THE DEVELOPER AND JUST GO, HEY, WHAT WOULD YOU WHAT DO YOU THINK IS THE EASIEST THING FOR YOU TO BE ABLE TO DO TO GET WHAT YOU WANT? AND THEN THE TOWN COUNCIL CAN LOOK AT IT FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF, HEY,[INAUDIBLE]. DO YOU WANT TO COME UP? WHAT WE WANT. [INAUDIBLE] IS HERE. [INAUDIBLE] . I MEAN, BUT. YEAH. LIKE, DOES THAT HURT TO SEE? ANY BACKING? NOT US. I BROUGHT A LOT OF SHOW AND TELL. GOOD. I MEAN, WE'RE I THINK WE'RE ALL VERY SUPPORTIVE OF THIS DEVELOPMENT. WE ALL WANT TO GET IT MOVING. IT'S JUST THAT I FEEL LIKE IF WE MOVE FORWARD TONIGHT. I DON'T THINK IF WE VOTE ON WHAT'S PRESENTED TO US TONIGHT, I DON'T THINK YOU'RE GOING TO GET WHAT YOU ARE ANTICIPATING AND I DON'T WANT TO HAVE PROBLEMS MOVING DOWN THE ROAD TO PROTECT EVERYBODY. YES, WE WANT TO PROTECT YOUR ABILITY TO MOVE. FULLY HEAR YOU, I THINK I CAN ARTICULATE EXACTLY WHERE WE ARE, WHERE WE'VE BEEN AND WHERE WE SHOULD BE GOING. ALL RIGHT, SO THOSE OF YOU WHO DON'T KNOW ME, MY NAME IS FRANK BONILLA. AND OBVIOUSLY I'M TRYING TO DEVELOP 15.2 ACRES AND PUT 51 HOMES. PRICE POINT FOR THAT IS GOING TO BE 2.8 MILLION TO 3.6 MILLION. IN A GATED COMMUNITY. I WANT TO DO A LITTLE DROP BACK ON WHAT THE IMPACT IS FOR THE TOWN OF WESTLAKE. IT MEANS $3 MILLION IN BUILDING PERMITS OVER THE NEXT 36 MONTHS. TAXES ON THOSE HOMES FOR AS LONG AS THEY ARE THERE OBVIOUSLY WILL BE $300,000 PER YEAR. I WANT TO SET THE STAGE FOR WHERE WE'RE AT. I WANT TO TAKE A STEP BACKWARDS HERE AND TALK ABOUT THE WESTLAKE ACADEMY CHECK THAT WE WROTE IN 2022. FOR 523, $520,000 IN GOOD FAITH BEFORE THE TOWN EVER EVEN ASKED US TO DO IT. OKAY. SO WE SHOULD NOT HAVE WRITTEN THAT CHECK. WE COULD HAVE DONE THAT AND PUT IT OVER TIME FOR $10,000 PER HOUSE. BUT MONEY WAS TIGHT. THE PREVIOUS ADMINISTRATION CAME AND SAID, HEY, WE NEED SOME HELP. WE THOUGHT WE COULD FAST TRACK IT AND HELP IT OUT. WE HAD THE CASH. WE PUT $520,000 IN. AS A SIDE NOTE, SINCE WE'RE GOING TO BUILD 51 HOMES, I'D LIKE TEN GRAND [INAUDIBLE]. [00:35:02] COME ON. SMILE. ALL RIGHT, WE GET IT. ALL RIGHT. I APOLOGIZE FOR ALL THE CONFUSION THAT'S BEEN GOING ON. OUR FIRST MIDDLE TO THE TOWN WAS MARCH 2023. WE SUBMITTED AGAIN IN SEPTEMBER OF 2023, AND WE SUBMITTED AGAIN TWICE IN 2024. I'VE TRIED FOR ALMOST 60 DAYS TO NEGOTIATE WITH TOWN STAFF, BUT HAVE BEEN UNSUCCESSFUL. MY POSITION THAT I'VE BEEN UNSUCCESSFUL IS THE BELIEF THAT WHEN WE ARE NEGOTIATING, I HEAR THESE THREE PHRASES. WE BELIEVE THIS WOULD MAKE YOUR DEVELOPMENT BETTER OR THAT STATEMENT. WE ARE WORRIED ABOUT SAFETY, ENTRANCE AND POSSIBLE ACCIDENTS. THAT STATEMENT, WE BELIEVE THAT LOOKING AT THE BACKYARDS WHERE THE TOWN CAN'T CONTROL THE ESTHETICS, THE BACKYARDS ON CAMPUS DRIVE IS A PROBLEM THAT NEEDS TO BE ADDRESSED. THOSE ARE THREE THINGS THAT YOU HEARD THEM SAY TODAY. PROBLEMS THAT WE'RE HAVING. I'D LIKE TO POINT OUT A COMMON THEME AND THAT THEME IS WE BELIEVE. I'D LIKE TO DEAL WITH SOME FACTS. ORDINANCE 994. TO YOUR POINT, IT TAKES EVERYTHING FROM THE 188 PAGES. THAT WAS THE [INAUDIBLE]. AND IT BOILS IT DOWN TO A FEW SIMPLE STATEMENTS. THOSE ARE WE WANT LESS STONE. WE WANT METAL ROOFS. REMEMBER THAT [INAUDIBLE] AND WE WANT TO BE ABLE TO DO FLAT ROOFS. PRETTY BASIC STUFF. WE NEGOTIATED THIS 994. EVERYBODY GOT IN A ROOM AND THEY DECIDED WHAT WOULD BE PULLING FROM THE KNOLL STANDARDS AND WE CAME UP WITH A VERY SIMPLE PIECE AND IT IS VERY SIMPLE. I HAVE NO IDEA HOW STAFF CAME UP WITH THE FACT THAT WE CAN'T DO 51 HOMES IN THIS. LOTS. WE'VE NEVER SAID IT, NEVER BEEN BROUGHT UP BEFORE. TONIGHT'S THE FIRST TIME I'VE HEARD THAT. SECOND, I CAN'T CONTROL THE SETBACKS. YOU GUYS HAVE ALREADY DONE THAT. YOU DID THAT WITH 4994959760703 AND 101. THAT'S MY PLAYING FIELD. I HAVE TO STAY IN THAT BOX. WE'VE SUBMITTED DRAWINGS. THOSE DRAWINGS SHOW A TEN FOOT [INAUDIBLE] BACK OF EACH LINE. WE SUBMITTED DRAWINGS, SHOWS 51 HOMES AND A DOG PARK. I'VE GOT NO VISIONS OF NOT BEING ABLE TO PUT 51. CAN I INTERJECT THERE FOR A SECOND? I'M JUST. I'M CONFUSED THEN. SO WHERE ARE YOU GETTING THE. YOU'RE SAYING THAT THESE ORDINANCES DETERMINE THOSE SETBACKS, BUT THEN WHAT? WE'RE. BUT BY ADOPTING THE KNOLLS, THE KNOLLS HAS A DIFFERENT SET OF SETBACKS. THAT'S WHERE THE CONFUSION IS. SO WHERE? THE KNOLL SETBACK WAS 30FT. IF IT. AND THAT WHEN WE SAID 994994 DOESN'T SAY 30FT. 994 WAS SPECIFICALLY CALLED OUT TO TALK ABOUT ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS. IT NEVER DISCUSSED AND NEVER WAS INTENDED TO DISCUSS THAT LINE. SO 994 WAS THE ONE THAT WAS APPROVED ON APRIL 1ST, 2024. I'M NOT SEEING ANY. I MEAN, BUT DOES THAT DISCUSS THE SETBACKS? BECAUSE I'M NOT SEEING ANYTHING IN THERE AT 904. GO AHEAD. CAN WE REVIEW THAT AND SEE DOES 994, HAVE THE SETBACKS IN IT? ABSOLUTELY. SO THE SETBACKS AREN'T COMING OUT OF ORDINANCE NUMBER 994. THE SETBACKS ARE COMING OUT OF THE DESIGN GUIDELINES WHICH WAS ADOPTED FOR THE ENTRADA PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT. WHAT ORDINANCE 994 WAS OVERRULED BY WAS ORDINANCE NUMBER 1001 AND THAT'S WHAT DEALT WITH THE VISIBILITY TRIANGLES. UNFORTUNATELY, IN ORDINANCE 1001, THERE WEREN'T MINIMUM SETBACK REQUIREMENTS THAT WERE INCLUDED FOR THOSE VISIBILITY TRIANGLES. SO TO CLARIFY THAT BECAUSE THE DEVELOPMENT IS STILL UNDER ORDINANCE 994, BUT ALSO 1001 BECAUSE IT'S STILL PART OF THE ENTRADA PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT. IT WAS NOT REZONED. IT HAS NOT BEEN REMOVED FROM ENTRADA AND SO BECAUSE OF THAT, WE WANTED SOME CLARITY THERE IN TERMS OF ENSURING THAT THOSE MINIMUM VISIBILITY TRIANGLES WERE FULFILLED. THAT'S WHERE THE TEN FEET IS COMING IN FROM. SO IF WE WERE TO GO BY WHAT IS IN THE DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR ENTRADA, THAT WOULD ACTUALLY REQUIRE THAT THE BUILDING FACADE BE BUILT ON THE BILL TWO LINE AND THE ABSENCE OF THE BUILDING FACADE, THERE WOULD BE A WALL, A MINIMUM OF SIX FEET IN HEIGHT AND THAT'S WHERE THERE WOULD BE A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE ACTUAL ARCHITECTURE THAT IS INTENDED FOR THE HOMES AND HOW ENTRADA, THE BASE DESIGN STANDARDS COULD IMPACT THAT. AND IF I MAY CLARIFY AS WELL, THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT, NOR THE OFFICE OF THE TOWN MANAGER IS SAYING THAT 51 HOMES CAN'T BE CREATED OR CONSTRUCTED. WHAT IS BEING SAID IS THAT THOSE SETBACKS COULD ULTIMATELY AFFECT THAT, [00:40:02] BECAUSE RIGHT NOW, THE ONLY THING THAT HAS BEEN SUBMITTED IS A PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN, WHICH FUNCTIONS AS A PRELIMINARY PLAT. BUT THAT'S NOT LEGALLY BINDING. AND THAT'S ALL WE WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT THE DEVELOPER WAS AWARE OF. WE DO WANT TO SEE THE PROJECT MOVE FORWARD. THERE IS MOMENTUM WITHIN ENTRADA, BUT ON TOP OF THAT, WE WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT WE HAVE RULES AND REGULATIONS THAT ARE IN PLACE THAT ALLOW FOR THAT EXPEDITED REVIEW AND APPROVAL. I'LL WHAT A WASHING MACHINE I JUST HEARD. I'LL BE PERFECTLY FRANK. THIS SORRY. AND FRANKLY, THIS IS THE SITUATION THAT I'M HAVING TO BECAUSE I'M TRYING TO UNDERSTAND, LIKE I WANT YOU TO GET I WANT THESE TO BE OUTLINED THE WAY THAT WORKS, TO MAKE, YOU KNOW, TO ALLOW YOU TO DEVELOP IT THE WAY YOU WANT TO. THE PROBLEM IS THAT THE WAY THAT THE WORDING IS, I THINK WE JUST NEED JUST NEED TO, LIKE, WE NEED TO CLEAR IT UP AND GET IT ACCURATE AND THEN MOVE FORWARD. IT IS ACTUALLY STILL VERY ACCURATE. IT'S THE WASHING MACHINE THAT YOU'RE HEARING. I'LL ASK IT AGAIN. I'VE SAID THIS REPEATEDLY ON THIS TRIANGLE THAT HE'S SO WORRIED ABOUT. MY ANSWER HAS BEEN THE SAME EVERY STEP OF THE WAY. WE WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH 994. WE WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH 959. WE WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH 760. WE WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH 703. WE WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH 101. YOU KNOW WHAT ALL THAT SAYS? THAT YOU GOT TO HAVE A TEN FOOT BACK FOLLOWED BY A TRIANGLE. I'LL PASS THIS OUT TO YOU. JOHN, CAN YOU HELP ME OUT? SO, FRANK, THIS IS A TEN FOOT SETBACK FROM THE ROAD. WHAT ABOUT THE SIDES AND THE SIDE? SETBACKS. EVERYBODY GETS ONE OF THESE. I THINK IT'S TEN FEET ON SIDES. AND GIVE EVERYBODY ONE OF THOSE. I JUST WANT TO CLARIFY, BECAUSE I GOT CONFUSION IN THIS. MR. BONILLA, JUST A COUPLE OF QUESTIONS. GO RIGHT AHEAD. I KNOW THAT IT'S BEEN VERY FRUSTRATING FOR YOU, TO SAY THE LEAST. YEAH. AND I HOPE YOU UNDERSTAND THAT THE ENTIRE COUNCIL IS VERY EAGER TO SEE A LOT OF THIS DEVELOPMENT HAPPEN. I FULLY UNDERSTAND THAT, TOO. YEAH. LET'S NOT CALL EACH OTHER A WASHING MACHINE, BECAUSE I FEEL LIKE IF WE'RE PLAYING WITH ORDINANCES AND RULES, IT JUST DOES NO GOOD. I'LL WATCH IT NEXT TIME. I APPRECIATE THE UPDATE. THE TRUTH IS THAT THE ORDINANCES DO HAVE A LOGIC TO THEM. THEY DO. THAT'S PRETTY CLEAR. YEAH, BUT THAT'S NOT THE POINT. I THINK THE POINT IS THAT YOU'RE FRUSTRATED AND WE WANT CLARITY. YOU WANT CLARITY? I THINK WE HAVE IT. AND YOU WANT EXPEDIENCY. YEAH, BUT THAT'S WHERE THE DISCONNECT IS. I DON'T THINK THAT CLARITY IS CLEAR TO EVERYBODY. NOW MY CONCERN WITH I THINK TAMMY'S ON THE RIGHT TRACK HERE TO LOOK FOR CLARITY IN WAYS OF WORKING. MY CONCERN WITH WRITING AN ENTIRELY NEW ARCHITECTURAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN IS THAT IT COULD BE VERY TIME CONSUMING AND COSTLY. LASTLY, ON THE FLIP SIDE, IF WE EXPEDITE THIS AND SIMPLY CHANGE THE SETBACKS. MY CONCERN IS THAT WE'RE GOING TO HAVE NEW ISSUES CROPPING UP AS WE GO. SURE. SO I THINK THE BEST THING FOR EVERYBODY, IN TERMS OF PRACTICALITY AND EXPEDIENCY IS TO KEEP IT AS SIMPLE AS POSSIBLE. RIGHT. SO THAT'S REALLY WHAT I WANT TO GO FOR. I'D LIKE TO TALK ABOUT CLARITY AND ROLES ON TEAMS AND CLARITY AND ROLES AND REGULATIONS, SO THAT EVERYBODY KNOWS WHAT THEIR SWIM LANE IS IN. SO WHAT MIGHT BE A WAY TO EXPLORE A DEVELOPMENT PLAN THAT MEETS YOUR NEEDS, AS WELL AS THE COUNCIL'S NEEDS? DO YOU WANT TO TALK ABOUT THAT? WHAT I'D LIKE TO TO TRY IS TO TAKE THE POINTS THAT HE BROUGHT UP. WE'LL START WITH THE TRIANGLE. WE CAN THEN GO TO THE WORRIED ABOUT THE BACKUP TRAFFIC. WE'LL MOVE TO THE SHRUBS. THOSE ARE. THOSE SEEM TO ME TO BE THE THREE ISSUES THAT WERE BROUGHT UP TODAY, BUT AGREED UPON. NO, YEAH. FINE. SIR, ARE YOU GOING TO BE REFERRING TO THESE DOCUMENTS YOU HAVE? YEAH. I'M GOING TO GET ALL THESE TO YOU SO THAT WE CAN GO IN AND YOU CAN PICK WHAT WE'RE GOING TO GO ONE BY ONE. THE DOCUMENT YOU'RE GETTING CURRENTLY. THAT WAS MY NUMBER TWO ITEM. MISS WHITE, BUT I'M GOING TO GO AHEAD AND START WITH NUMBER TWO, SINCE THAT SEEMS TO BE THE FIRST ONE ON THE VISIBILITY ISSUE. SO THE REQUIREMENT ON THE VIEW TRIANGLES, EACH TEN FOOT BUILDING LINE, WHICH JASON STATED THE REQUIREMENT FOR THE GARAGE IS PER ORDINANCE 101 THAT WAS AGREED UPON WHEN MICHAEL BEATTIE AND OUR YOUR COUNCIL MEETING FOR ALL FUTURE RESIDENTS DEVELOPMENT IN TORONTO. THAT'S WHERE THAT TEN FOOT EASEMENT CAME FROM. THE BUILDING LINE FOR RESIDENTS IN THE KNOLLS ARE 30FT. STAFF HAS TOLD ME TIME AND TIME AGAIN AND IT'S IN EMAILS AND YOU HAVE ONE OF THOSE EMAILS FROM FROM WADE. WE ARE ALLOWING YOU TO MEET THE BILLING LINES OF ENTRADA SINCE YOUR DEVELOPMENT IS WITHIN THE ENTRADA PD. INSTEAD OF HOLDING YOU TO THE NORMAL STANDARDS, THIS IS A QUOTE FROM THE TOWN TO THE DEVELOPER. I'M IN AGREEMENT. I'VE SAID FROM DAY ONE WE WILL COMPLY. [00:45:04] WE'RE COMPLYING WITH ALL THE REQUIREMENTS THAT HE HAS. NOT A PROBLEM AT ALL. IF YOU TURN THE PAGE AND YOU LOOK AT THE 994 EXCERPT REGARDING SETBACKS, I'VE HIGHLIGHTED BUILDING SETBACKS TO FOLLOW EITHER THE ESTABLISHED AND TROTTA GUIDELINES OR, AS AMENDED, FOR THIS PHASE OF THE DEVELOPMENT ONLY. WELL, I'M IN AGREEMENT WITH YOU. ALL MY DRAWINGS THAT I'VE TURNED IN ARE OKAY. THE OTHER THING IS THERE, MISS WHITE, I TALK ABOUT AND ALSO MISS GREAVES, THINGS THAT WE TALKED ABOUT AT 994. THESE ARE SOME OF THOSE PIECES THAT WE EXERTED OUT OF THE KNOLLS REQUIREMENTS. AND THOSE WERE BUILDING HEIGHT. THOSE ARE GARAGES. ROOFS. EXTERIOR WALLS. WHAT KIND OF FENCES WE COULD HAVE AND EXTERIOR LIGHTING. ALL THINGS EXTRACTED TO MAKE 994 A REALITY. LET'S LOOK AT THE VENTANAS DRIVEWAY. SETBACKS. THAT'S GOING TO BE ON PAGE FOUR. THIS IS AN EXCERPT FROM MY PLAN AND YOU CAN SEE THE TEN FOOT EASEMENT THAT'S ALREADY BEEN DRAWN ON HERE. THEN PRESENTED TIME AND TIME AGAIN. IT'S PRESENTED MARCH 23RD. MAY 23RD SEPTEMBER 23RD. OCTOBER 24TH. NOVEMBER 24TH. THAT TEN FOOT PLAT EASEMENT ACROSS ALL LOTS IN PHASE THREE WILL AUTOMATICALLY FORCE THE GARAGE DOORS TO BE 25FT BACK IN ACCORDANCE WITH 703. REMEMBER, WHEN WE'RE LOOKING AT THIS DIAGRAM, WE HAVE A BUNCH OF ORDINANCES AND YOU HAVE TO GO AND YOU HAVE TO KEEP PICKING AT WHERE THEY SEND YOU. SO WHAT I'VE DONE HERE IS TRY TO CONDENSE THIS TO SHOW YOU THAT AT EVERY TURN WE'VE GONE TO THE NEXT REQUIREMENT OF ORDINANCES THAT WERE VOTED ON BY YOUR TOWN COUNCIL AND CAN I JUST ASK YOU A QUESTION? SO YOU SAID THAT YOU HAVE A TEN FOOT EASEMENT, SO THE GARAGE DOORS WILL BE 25 FOOT BACK. WELL, YOU HAVE A TEN FOOT EASEMENT. THEN THE GARAGE SITS SO THAT GARAGE PUSHES BACK 25FT. THAT CREATES THAT ANGLE THAT HE'S TALKING ABOUT. WE'RE FULL AGREEMENT. THAT ANGLE NEEDS TO EXIST. THE DRAWING ON THE NEXT PAGE, PAGE FIVE, ARTICULATES EXACTLY WHAT IS IN THE ORDINANCE, ARTICULATES EXACTLY WHAT MY DRAWING AND THE HOMES WILL LOOK LIKE. THERE'S ONLY TWO WAYS TO PUT A GARAGE IN EITHER FORWARD FACING OR SIDE FACING. SO THE ONE ON THE LEFT WILL BE A SIDE FACE GARAGE. YOUR TEN FOOT BACK ACCORDING TO THE DRAWINGS AND ACCORDING TO 703. BUT YOU CREATE THAT TRIANGLE, RIGHT? BECAUSE THE GARAGE IS ON THE SIDE. ON THE FRONT, THE GARAGE PUSHES INTO THE BUILD LINE. 25FT WILL CREATE THAT TRIANGLE AND ANOTHER NOTE HERE REAL QUICK AND SOME OF YOU WERE HERE FOR IT. SOME OF YOU WEREN'T, BUT I THINK IT'S WORTH REPEATING. IT CAN'T BE OVERLOOKED. THE ENTRADA ROADS THAT WE ALL HAVE TO LIVE WITH NOW. THEY'RE ONLY 24FT. THE KNOLLS IS 25, RIGHT? MANY OF THE COUNCIL PEOPLE CAME. FIRE CHIEF CAME AND SAID, PLEASE DON'T DO THIS. IT'S NOT GOOD, RIGHT? IT PUTS A STRAIN ON SAFETY OF GATHERING PEOPLE. WE'RE WORRIED ABOUT KIDS. SOMEBODY GETTING HURT. VOLUNTARILY. WE WENT TO 31FT AND THAT'S HUGE. BECAUSE FROM A DEVELOPER STANDPOINT, IF YOU DO THE MATH RIGHT, I CAN BUMP EVERYBODY A FEW MORE FEET. WE DIDN'T DO THAT. WE LISTENED TO IT AND I LIVE IN ENTRADA, AND I KNOW VERY WELL THAT IF WE COULD HAVE READ, IF WE COULD ERASE IT WITH ERASER, I'D BE THE FIRST ONE TO SAY WE NEED TO HAVE A BIG ERASER ON THE ROADS. IS IT IS NOT SAFE IN MY OPINION. SO WE TRIED TO LISTEN TO THE JUDGMENT OF A FIRE CHIEF AND CITY COUNCIL, AND WE DID. SO GO TO THE NEXT PAGE, PAGE SIX, ORDINANCE 703. AGAIN, I'VE HIGHLIGHTED IT. IT TELLS YOU RIGHT HERE IN 703. SECTION NINE GARAGE SETBACKS. GARAGE MAY BE SET BACK FROM THE PROPERTY LINE, EITHER A DISTANCE LESS THAN FIVE FEET OR A DISTANCE GREATER THAN 25, IN ORDER TO AVOID HAVING VEHICLES PARKED IN THE DRIVEWAY BLOCKING SIDEWALKS OR PEDESTRIAN ACCESS. WE DON'T HAVE THAT. WE BUILT IT INTO OUR PROGRAM. OKAY. SO ANOTHER QUESTION THOUGH. AND THIS ONE, IT'S SHOWING NO MINIMUM SETBACKS ON THE OTHER SIDES OF THE HOUSE. IS THAT BECAUSE THAT WAS THE ENTRADA? IT'S SAYING YOU'RE SAYING FRONT YARD OR SETBACKS? NO MINIMUM REAR YARD, NO MINIMUM SIDE YARD. NO MINIMUM REAR YARD. IN TERMS OF YOUR SETBACKS. THIS IS WHERE I WAS CONFUSED TOO, BECAUSE WHEN YOU LOOK AT THE KNOLLS HAS A MINIMUM TEN FOOT SIDE SETBACKS, 20 FOOT REAR SETBACK. I'M JUST WONDERING, LIKE, IF YOU'RE GOING BY KNOWLES. AND I THINK THIS WAS THE ARGUMENT THAT THAT STAFF HAD, WAS THAT IF YOU'RE GOING BY THE KNOLLS, THEN YOU MIGHT NOT BE ABLE TO FIT ALL THOSE HOUSES BECAUSE YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE THESE REALLY TINY HOUSES, RIGHT? ARE YOU STILL PLANNING ON HAVING THOSE SETBACKS OR NOT ON THE SIDES? YES. IT'S WE HAVE TO HAVE THAT. YOU HAVE TO BE ABLE TO ENTER. IF YOU HAVE A POOL, YOUR DOG, IT'S FIVE FEET ON THIS SIDE AND FIVE FEET ON THIS SIDE. TEN FEET. OKAY. SO TEN FEET TOTAL. NOT SO. ONLY A FIVE FOOT SETBACK ON EACH SIDE. [00:50:01] NOT REQUIRED TO DO ANY. WELL, ACCORDING TO THE SOLANA. SEE THAT'S WHERE IT'S CONFUSING BECAUSE ACCORDING TO THE KNOLLES GUIDELINES, YOU ARE. SO THAT'S WHERE THE CONFUSION COMES. IF I MAY, COUNCILMEMBER REEVES, IF WE COULD MAYBE BACK UP JUST SLIGHTLY ON THE TEN FEET WITH THE PLANET EASEMENT ON PAGE FOUR, I THINK IT'S IMPORTANT TO NOTE THAT WITHIN THE EASEMENT, YOU'RE NOT ABLE TO CONSTRUCT ANYTHING WITHIN THE EASEMENT. WHAT WE'RE SAYING IS THAT THERE IS AN ACTUAL TEN FOOT SETBACK FROM THAT BILL. TWO LINE FOR THE GARAGES. THAT'S WHAT'S BEING DESCRIBED IN THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AND PART OF THAT IS BECAUSE WE HAVE A PRELIMINARY PLAT OR A PRELIMINARY SITE EVALUATION PLAN THAT IS NOT BINDING. IT'S NOT EVEN BINDING ACCORDING TO STATE LAW. AND SO, TO PROVIDE THE ASSURANCES AND PREDICTABILITY THAT BOTH THE DEVELOPER AND TOWN STAFF NEED, THAT'S WHY THAT PROVISION WAS PROPOSED WITHIN THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. THE OTHER THING THAT I WOULD BRING TO YOUR CONSIDERATION, AND I DON'T HAVE THE LEGAL LEASE OFFHAND, BUT ORDINANCE 10-01, THOSE PROVISIONS, THOSE SUPERSEDE THE PROVISIONS THAT ARE IN ORDINANCE 703. AND I THINK THAT THERE IS STANDARD LANGUAGE THAT IS HAD THAT STATES THAT WHEREVER THAT ORDINANCE IS IN CONFLICT, IT ACTUALLY SUPERSEDES PREVIOUS ORDINANCES. SO AGAIN, THE IDEA ISN'T TO PLACE A DEVELOPER IN AN AWKWARD POSITION. WE WANT PREDICTABILITY JUST AS MUCH AS THEY DO, SO THAT WAY WE CAN GET THROUGH THIS DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCESS QUICKLY. MIC]. THAT'S WHAT WE PUT FROM THE LOT LINE BECAUSE WE ASSUMED THAT THE LOT LINE, WHICH IS THAT BILL TWO LINE, WAS ACTUALLY GOING TO BE SET BACK FROM THE RIGHT OF WAY. FRANK, JUST TO CLARIFY, IT SOUNDS LIKE WHEN YOU'RE LOOKING AT A LOT IN VENTANAS, YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT FIVE FEET ON THE LEFT SIDE AND RIGHT SIDE OF THE HOME. YOU'RE CORRECT. FIVE FEET ON THE BACK OF THE HOME. PARDON ME? FIVE FEET ON THE BACK OF THE HOME. WELL, THE BACK OF THE HOME IS YOURS. SO, YEAH, IT'S FIVE FEET FROM THAT FENCE LINE. OKAY. AND THEN YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT 35FT ON THE DRIVEWAY. IS THAT WHAT YOU'RE SAYING? WE HAVE TEN FOOT FOR THE EASEMENT. PUT YOUR GARAGE. THAT PUSHES YOU BACK 25 MORE FEET, CREATING THAT SIGHT LINE OF SAFETY THAT EVERYBODY IS ALREADY BAKED INTO THE SITUATION. BUT IT SOUNDS LIKE YOU'RE SAYING THAT YOU WOULD START BUILDING ON THAT TEN FOOT LINE, WHEREAS IT SOUNDS LIKE THEY'RE SAYING YOU HAVE TO START TEN FOOT BACK FROM THAT LINE. SO THAT'S WHERE I'M VERY CONFUSED. I WOULD SAY TO YOU, I JUST FEEL LIKE IT'S SO IF I MAY ASK THIS. SO IT SOUNDS LIKE WE'RE SAYING THAT IT'S A 25 FOOT SETBACK FOR THE GARAGE. NO. OKAY. IT'S ALWAYS BEEN A WE CAN'T BUILD WITHIN TEN FEET OF THE LINE BACK UP TEN FEET. THAT'S THE EASEMENT. THAT'S THE EASEMENT. NOW WE'RE STARTING TO BUILD. IT'S TEN FEET. IT'S ALWAYS BEEN THAT 994 STATED IT. IT WAS ALWAYS WHAT WE TALKED ABOUT. IT'S NEVER CHANGED. SO THIS IS WHY I THINK IT WOULD BE EASIER IF WE JUST HAD OKAY. SO A GOVERNING DOCUMENT . JUST TO BACKTRACK A LITTLE BIT, FRANK. SURE. FROM MY MEMORY FROM A FEW YEARS AGO, EVEN, YOU KNOW, THIS PIECE OF LAND, RIGHT. WAS GREAT TO HAVE. RIGHT TO TAKE BACK TO TO RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AND THAT COULD HAPPEN. SURE. YEAH. RIGHT. TOTALLY AGREE. AND, YOU KNOW, THIS WAS SUPPOSED TO BE ORIGINALLY PART OF ENTRADA. BUT LIKE WE ALL KNOW, THE ATHLETICS AND THE MARKET HAS CHANGED DRAMATICALLY, RIGHT? CORRECT AND SO IT WAS A HUGE WIN EVEN A FEW YEARS AGO TO GET TO THE POINT WHERE WE COULD USE A DIFFERENT ESTHETIC THAN ENTRADA AND GET A MORE MODERN, UPDATED ESTHETIC. RIGHT. YES. IT LOOKS TO ME LIKE WE MADE A MISTAKE THEN IN REFERENCING LIKE TAMI SAYING THE KNOLLS, BECAUSE WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE TO US AND I'M SURE YOU DON'T INTEND THIS, IT LOOKS LIKE YOU'RE PULLING WHAT YOU LIKE ABOUT THE ENTRADA DEVELOPMENT PLAN, AND WHAT YOU LIKE ABOUT THE KNOLLS DEVELOPMENT PLAN, AND YOU'RE CHERRY PICKING AND THAT MAKES IT REALLY TOUGH FOR THE TOWN TO ACTUALLY MANAGE WHAT YOU'RE DOING, AMONG ALL THE OTHER THINGS THEY DO. SO THAT'S WHY I THINK THE PROPOSAL TO HAVE SOME TYPE OF EXPEDITED DEVELOPMENT PLAN JUST FOR VENTANAS WOULD CREATE A LOT OF CLARITY. I'M ALMOST CERTAIN THAT IF WE DON'T DO THAT, WE'RE GOING TO HAVE OTHER ISSUES BESIDES THE FIVE FOOT SETBACK LEFT, RIGHT AND BACK AND THE GARAGE DRIVEWAY SETBACK. WE'RE GOING TO HAVE OTHER ISSUES COMING UP BECAUSE OF THIS REFERENCING. CAN'T YOU JUST REDLINE THE KNOLLS? WE ALREADY DID. DID YOU? I MEAN, THIS IS WHAT I STILL DON'T UNDERSTAND YOU. IT'S WHAT'S THERE. GREAVES. THE CITY COUNCIL WANTED TO GET TO ALLOW US TO BUILD ARCHITECTURALLY HOMES LIKE THE [00:55:01] KNOLLS. THAT'S ALL THEY WANTED. BUT AT THE SAME TIME, YOU HAVE TO ADMIT THAT, LIKE, I'M NOT. I'M ONLY SAYING THE KNOLLS, THE KNOLLS ARCHITECTURAL GUIDELINES. SO YOU'RE SAYING THAT YOU HAVE THIS SELECT SET OF A COUPLE BULLET POINTS, BUT YOU CAN SEE BY WHAT WE WERE PRESENTED FROM BELLAGIO THAT WE NEED A MUCH MORE COMPREHENSIVE. I'M GLAD YOU BROUGHT THAT UP. YOU KNOW, IT'S AMAZING TO ME. YOU VOTED FOR 994 ON APRIL THE 1ST. AT THE NEXT MEETING, IT WAS READ INTO THE NOTES THAT IT WAS ACCEPTED. I'VE BEEN ASKING FOR TEN MONTHS FOR A COPY OF 994. DO YOU REALIZE TODAY IT SHOWS UP ON THE WEBSITE? TEN MONTHS I'VE BEEN ASKING FOR THAT. SO VERY CONFUSING FOR ME. NOW I'M HERE FROM DAY ONE WHEN WE SHOWED THE PLAT RIGHT, OUR PRELIMINARY PLAT, WE SHOWED TEN FOOT LINES. ENTRADA HAS ZERO. 10. NO ONE HAD ANY EXPECTATIONS THAT WE WERE GOING TO DO 30. NEVER TALKED ABOUT. IN FACT, THE IF YOU LOOK AT THE. PAGE 4, WE COMPLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH ORDINANCE 703. 703 IS VERY SPECIFIC. WE DID TEN FOOT PLATTED EASEMENT. ALL FRONTS FOR THE LOTS. WE DID THAT. NOW YOU'RE ASKING TO GO BACK ANOTHER TEN FEET. KIND OF CONFUSING FOR US. FIRST TIME I'VE EVER HEARD THIS. I KNOW IT'S FRUSTRATING FOR US AS WELL. I MEAN, I KNOW IT'S FRUSTRATING FOR YOU. WE VOTED ON 994 APRIL 1ST, BUT THE PRECEDENTS AND PRECEDENTS OF THE OTHER ORDINANCE 10-01, DOES EXIST. OH, AND IT'S VERY CLEAR WHAT IT WANTS TO DO, THOUGH. 10-01 IS VERY CLEAR WHAT IT'S SUPPOSED TO DO. WHAT I'M SAYING IS THERE'S A DISCONNECT BETWEEN WHAT YOUR UNDERSTANDING IS AND WHAT OUR TOWN'S UNDERSTANDING OF THE ORDINANCE. SO WE WANT TO CLARIFY THAT TODAY. SO WHY DON'T WE PULL OUT 10-01 HAVE STAFF EXPLAIN WHAT 10-01 IS. FRANK, IF I MAY. YOU'RE A BUILDER. YOU'VE DONE A GREAT JOB OF DISMANTLING. SORRY. I'M THE PHANTOM VOICE OVER HERE. FRANK. YOU'RE DISMANTLING. OKAY, YOU'RE A BUILDER. BUT I'M GOING TO ASK YOU TO DO IS TELL US WHAT IT IS YOU IS YOU WANT TO BUILD WITH RESPECT TO THE SETBACKS, VERY SPECIFICALLY WITHOUT REFERENCING, YOU KNOW, NOW WE'VE GOT AN ISSUE THAT SOMEHOW 994 WAS LOST IN CYBERSPACE OR NEVER POSTED. BUT DO YOU WANT US? LET'S JUST PUT THIS ON HOLD AND WE'LL GO INVESTIGATE THAT. IS THAT THE POINT THAT YOU'RE MAKING TODAY, OR WOULD YOU LIKE TO BUILD SOMETHING AND TELL US WHAT IT IS YOU'D LIKE TO BUILD? LET'S DOCUMENT THAT SPECIFICALLY AND WE'LL RALLY AROUND IT. BUT WHAT I'M HEARING INSTEAD IS ALMOST LIKE WE'RE WATCHING SOME SORT OF TRIAL THING, AND THAT'S NOT WHAT THIS IS. LIKE I'LL BE HONEST, I'VE HAD THE SAME SET OF PLANS IN FRONT OF STAFF FOR OVER A YEAR, AND FOR OVER A YEAR THAT BUILD LINE HAS BEEN PRESENT IN YOUR DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. HAVE YOU PROPOSED THE SETBACKS FOR THE FRONT, THE BACK, THE SIDES, THE GARAGES? AND TO THE EXTENT YOU JUST SAID YOUR RED LINE, THE KNOLLS THAT YOU PRESENTED, I DIDN'T SEE A RED LINE IN THE PRE READ. I PRESENTED YOUR RED LINE VERSION. I MEAN LET'S BUILD SOMETHING. LET'S PUT SOMETHING TOGETHER. AMEN. SO LET ME JUST ASK. FORGET THE ORDINANCES, BUT EVERYTHING ASIDE AND CLEAN SHEET OF PAPER WITH THE SETBACKS WE HAVE. FORGET WHAT WAS WRITTEN AND LOOK, I EXPECT OUR TOWN AND OUR DEVELOPERS TO ADHERE TO OUR RULES AND OUR PROCESSES. AND I WANT EVERYTHING. I WANT TO PROTECT OUR BUILDERS AND INVESTORS AS MUCH AS I WANT TO PROTECT OUR TOWN. RIGHT. I WAS HERE WHEN ALL THIS HAPPENED WITH MR. BONILLA. RIGHT? WE. THERE WAS A LOT GOING ON. THE INTENT WAS TO GET THE KNOLLS ARCHITECTURE ENTRANDA, TO GET AND TRY TO JUMPSTART. IT'S BEEN SITTING DORMANT FOR EIGHT YEARS. RIGHT? OR NOT DORMANT, BUT SLOW. WE'VE GOT A LOT OF MOVEMENT THE LAST NINE MONTHS. AND AS I'M SITTING HERE, IRREGARDLESS OF THE ORDINANCES, CAN WE LIVE WITH WHAT MR. BONILLA HAS POSTED HERE WITH THE SETBACKS, EVEN THOUGH WE MIGHT HAVE SOME CONFLICTING DOCUMENTS THAT WILL CLEAN UP. WE GOT TO CLEAN. THAT'S ON US. AND MR. BONILLA WILL NEED YOUR HELP TO DO THAT. BUT NOTWITHSTANDING ALL OF THE ORDINANCES IN THIS, ARE WE COMFORTABLE? ARE WE COMFORTABLE WITH THE SETBACKS AND WHAT HE'S OUTLINED TO DO AND ENTRADA ON THIS POINT, MAYOR, I THINK THE ISSUE THAT STAFF HAS WITH THIS IS EVERYTHING THAT HE HAS LINED OUT WITH SETBACKS. I DON'T THINK WE HAVE ANY ISSUES WITH. THE PROBLEM IS IT'S ON A PRELIMINARY PLAT, RIGHT, OR A DOCUMENT THAT IS NOT LEGALLY BINDING. THAT'S WHY WE'RE TRYING TO GET THAT INFORMATION INTO A DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT SO THAT IT IS LEGALLY BINDING, SO THAT WE HAVE A STANDARD AT WHICH WE CAN HOLD HIM DURING THE DEVELOPMENT, BECAUSE IT'S NOT GOING TO BE FRANK. [01:00:01] FRANK'S GOING TO BE HE'S GOING TO BUILD THE INFRASTRUCTURE AND HE'S GOING TO SELL THOSE LOTS, AND WE'RE GOING TO HAVE INDIVIDUAL BUILDERS THAT WE HAVE TO HOLD TO THESE STANDARDS. SO WE HAVE TO BE VERY CLEAR ON WHAT THAT IS. BUT WAIT, STEP ON THE IDEA OF SIMPLICITY, RIGHT. STEP ONE. WE'RE IN AGREEMENT WITH WHAT HE WANTS TO DO. WE YOU'RE WHAT I'M UNDERSTANDING IS WE NEED TO DO A BETTER JOB DOCUMENTING BOTH SIDES, BUT WE ARE FUNDAMENTALLY IN AGREEMENT WITH THE DEVELOPMENT THAT HE WANTS TO PUT IN. IF WE FORMALIZE ALL THE DETAILS FOR MOST, YES, FOR MOST UNDER THOSE THREE, DEFINE THAT YOU NEED TO DEFINE WHEN WE SAY WE'RE IN AGREEMENT BECAUSE, WELL, I THINK THERE'S IT'S TEN FOOT SETBACK ON THAT POINT ALONE HERE, WHICH WERE THE TEN FOOT TEN FOOT SETBACK FROM THE FRONT. YES. FIVE FOOT ON EACH SIDE AND FIVE FOOT IN THE BACK. IS THAT WHAT YOU WANT? THAT'S WHAT'S ON PAGE FIVE. THERE YOU GO. AND I THINK THAT'S WHAT WE NEED TO SAY THAT WE'RE GOOD WITH. AND THEN DOCUMENT IT IN SOME WAY. THE TOWN NEEDS TO FIGURE OUT HOW WE CAN DOCUMENT THIS WITH AND MOVE FORWARD WITH THE DEVELOPERS. YEAH. CALL ATTACHMENT 17 OR WHATEVER IT IS. PUT PAGE FIVE. THAT'S FIVE FEET ON THE LEFT. FIVE FEET ON THE RIGHT. TEN FEET ON THE FRONT. IS COUNCIL IN AGREEMENT WITH THAT STATEMENT? YES. AS LONG AS WE HAVE A DOCUMENT THAT THANK YOU THAT WE AGREE ON AND YOU CAN EXECUTE. I MEAN, IT SOUNDS TO ME IT'S SOMETHING THAT'S I CAN EXECUTE 51 HOMES ON 15.2 ACRES ON EXACTLY WHAT THIS PIECE OF PAPER SHOWS, WHICH IS TEN FEET FROM THE FRONT FIVE ON THE LEFT BACK. I STILL THINK WE NEED TO HAVE LIKE A CLEAR, CONCISE DOCUMENT THAT'S SHOWING WE WILL WE'RE GETTING THERE. IF YOU HAVE THIS, I JUST THIS IS GETTING VERY CLOUDY ON ORDINANCES TIMING. CAN WE PUT. MAYOR, YOU JUST TOLD ME TO A PERSON? WE AGREE WITH WHAT HE'S SAYING SHORT OF THE DOCUMENTATION FOR IT. YES, SIR. AND I THINK FOR THE DOCUMENTATION, IT'D BE SIMPLEST IF WE JUST TAKE THE KNOLLS DOCUMENT, LET MR. BONILLA GO BACK AND REDLINE THAT DOCUMENT OUT EXACTLY THE WAY HE WANTS IT. AND THEN WE WOULD HAVE A DOCUMENT BACK. I MEAN, THAT CAN BE DONE IN A VERY SHORT TIME PERIOD. DOESN'T COST HIM ANY MONEY. HE WOULD BE ABLE TO GO BACK AND BACK AND REDLINE THOSE DOCUMENTS, BRING THEM BACK TO US, AND WE WOULD HAVE A SET THAT WOULD BE SPECIFIC AND WE GET IN THE ROOM AND DO THAT TOGETHER. CAN WE EXPEDITE THIS? BUT I TO BE HONEST WITH YOU, I THINK DOING IT TOGETHER WOULD SLOW IT DOWN. I THINK IF MR. BONILLA WOULD TAKE IT BACK AND REDLINE THE KNOLLS DOCUMENT EXACTLY THE WAY HE WANTS IT, TAKE OUT THE THINGS THAT DON'T PERTAIN TO VENTANAS AND ADD IN THOSE SETBACKS AS HE'S JUST ASKED FOR. THEN I THINK STAFF WOULD BE MORE THAN SATISFIED THAT WE HAVE A DOCUMENT TO MOVE FORWARD WITH THAT IS COMPLETE, THAT COUNCIL HAS AGREED UPON, AND THAT WE CAN SEE A DEVELOPMENT COME TO FRUITION. MR. BONILLA. IT LOOKED LIKE YOU WERE SHAKING YOUR HEAD. I GUESS I'M JUST CONFUSED 994. PUT THAT DOCUMENT IN THE KNOLLS [INAUDIBLE] DID EVERYTHING THAT I WANTED AND ARTICULATED ONTO THIS PIECE OF PAPER. I'LL BE MORE THAN HAPPY TO GO BACK, BUT 994 TAKES CARE OF ALL THOSE QUESTIONS. BUT 994 IS JUST AN ORDINANCE. IT'S NOT A SET OF ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS. WE NEED A DETAILED SET OF ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS AND WHAT WAS INCORPORATED INTO THE DEVELOPER AGREEMENT? CORRECT. BUT AND I AGREE, BUT THAT NEEDS TO BE IT CAN'T JUST BE THE KNOLLS ADDED ON THERE BECAUSE THE KNOLLS HAS TOO MANY DISCREPANCIES FROM WHAT YOU'RE TRYING TO. [INAUDIBLE]. YOU TOOK THE ESTHETICS FROM THE KNOLLS AND BUILT IT IN ENTRADA THAT CREATED SOME INHERENT CONFUSION. SO WE'RE ASKING NO, NOT 994. WE'RE ASKING YOU TO HELP US. OKAY. BE AS EXPEDITED AS POSSIBLE, WHICH IS THE REDLINING OF THE KNOLLS DEVELOPMENT PROJ- DOCUMENT. AND DO THIS BECAUSE THERE IS OBVIOUSLY CONFUSION HERE. IT MAY NOT BE CONFUSING TO YOU, BUT YOU REALLY HAVE TO UNDERSTAND IT'S CONFUSING FOR EVERYBODY ELSE AND ALL OF THE DEVELOPERS COMING IN AFTER YOU WHO ARE GOING TO BUILD THOSE 51 HOUSES. YEAH. THERE'S ALSO, I MIGHT ADD, THERE'S A STRONG AMOUNT OF NAIVETE GOING ON HERE. I'M NOT SURE, FRANK, IF YOU'RE AS NAIVE AS WE ARE. BUT I'M GOING TO CLEAR UP WHERE WE'RE NOT NAIVE. WHEN YOU LOOK AT THE KNOLLS OR GRANADA, WHERE I'M THE ARCHITECTURAL COMMITTEE LEAD AND OR ANY, OF OUR COMMUNITIES, WHEN YOU HAVE TO HAVE A COMPLETE SET THAT ADDRESSES WHAT YOU'RE DOING OVER THE BUILD LINE AND UNDER BUILD. SO FOR EXAMPLE, THERE ARE ACCESSORY STRUCTURES THAT ARE ALLOWED TO BE OVER THE BUILD LINE. THEY'RE AIR CONDITIONERS AND OTHER STRUCTURAL THINGS THAT NEED TO BE SCREENED FROM THE STREET. YOU'RE NOT GOING TO WALK. BUT I LIVED IN A HOME THAT HAD A FIVE FOOT SIDE YARD SETBACK, AND THE AIR CONDITIONERS ARE ALIGNED. YOU'RE NOT EVEN WALKING THROUGH THERE BECAUSE THE AIR CONDITIONERS ARE ON A FOUR FOOT PAD. THERE ARE THINGS IN THE COMPLETE GUIDELINES FOR THE COMMUNITY THAT INCLUDE OUR INCLUDE EXTERIOR EXTERIOR FEATURES, LANDSCAPING, PLANTINGS THAT ARE SURE TO BE UNDERMINED BY THE SETBACKS THAT YOU HAVE ONLY [01:05:04] BECAUSE THEY'RE NOT AS GENEROUS AS THE REFERENCE DOCUMENT. THERE IS WORK TO DO AND AS A I'VE, AS A DEVELOPER AND THEN A BUILDER. AND I KNOW THAT A BUILDER CAN BE STUCK WITH WHATEVER THE DEVELOPER HAS AGREED TO. BUT THERE'S A PRACTICALITY THAT'S LACKING IN THIS CONVERSATION, AND THAT'S BECAUSE WE DON'T HAVE A LINKED DESIGN GUIDELINE FOR BUILDING A HOME, FOR OVERHANGS, FOR MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT, FOR OUTBUILDINGS AND ACCESSORY STRUCTURES THAT DEALS WITH YOUR SETBACKS. BECAUSE ALL I CAN LOOK AT IS THE NOTES. SO YOU REALLY HAVE KIND OF HALFWAY. YOU'RE HALFWAY THERE. AND I'M NOT NAIVE. AND, MAYOR, IF I WILL SAY. AND MR. ASSELTA, IF THE RED LINE DOCUMENT COMES BACK TO, WE CAN BRING THAT STRAIGHT BACK TO COUNCIL AND WE CAN HAVE THIS ON THE VERY NEXT COUNCIL MEETING. THAT'S GREAT. I JUST WANTED TO CHIME IN ON WHAT MIKE WAS SAYING. THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT I MEANT BY IF WE DON'T ADDRESS THIS WITH THE DOCUMENT, FRANK, WE'RE GOING TO HAVE OTHER ISSUES COMING UP WITH THIS. IT'S NOT JUST THE SETBACKS, UNFORTUNATELY. I DON'T KNOW WHAT'S ENCAPSULATED THERE. AS I SAID, I LIVED IN A HOME THAT WAS BUILT ON SIMILAR SETBACKS, AT LEAST ON THE SIDES. IT CAN BE DONE, BUT YOU NEED A COMPREHENSIVE SET OF GUIDELINES FOR THE BUILDERS TO BE GUIDED BY. AND THE POINT WAS MADE YOU WON'T. MAYBE YOU'LL BE A BUILDER AS WELL, BUT OTHER BUILDERS WILL COME IN AND BUY THE LOTS AND THE TOWN NEEDS TO AS WELL AS THE HOA. THEY WILL NEED TO GUIDE THOSE BUILDING GUIDELINES SO WE DON'T HAVE A FREE FOR ALL. SO THERE IS A LITTLE BIT OF INCOMPLETENESS HERE TODAY. I GUESS I WOULD LIKE TO LEAN ON STAFF JUST TO TAKE THAT DOCUMENT, BECAUSE FOR ME, WHAT I HAVE IS CLEAR. IF THERE'S SOMETHING THAT YOU WANT ME TO DO AS FAR AS THE AIR CONDITIONERS, MIKE AND CALL THEM AND SPREAD THOSE ACROSS SOMEHOW, I'D LOVE THE INPUT OF STAFF. I'M NOT SURE EXACTLY WHAT WHAT I CAN DO. FRANK, I KNOW YOU REALLY DON'T WANT TO DO THIS REDLINING FOR THE KNOLLS. AND I KNOW THAT YOU REALLY WANT IT TO BE FAST AND SIMPLE. NO, I'M NOT WORRIED. THE TRUTH IS, THERE IS A DISCONNECT AND THERE'S WORK TO BE DONE, AND WE'RE DOING IT AS QUICKLY AS POSSIBLE BY OFFERING TO REDLINE THE KNOLLS. AND I THINK IF STAFF KNOWS WHAT THEY WANT, I'D LIKE THEM TO PRESENT IT SO THAT I CAN LOOK AT IT. SO I'M NOT TRYING TO PUSH SOMETHING ON THEM THAT THEY DON'T WANT, OR THAT I'M TRYING TO GET AWAY WITH SOMETHING. SO IF STAFF WANTS TO WRITE THIS IN, I'LL BE MORE THAN HAPPY TO TAKE A LOOK AT IT. WELL, I THINK WE'RE NOT SHY ABOUT WRITING IN A DEVELOPER AGREEMENT THAT I DIDN'T AGREE TO AND PRESENT IT TO THEM. OKAY. SO I THINK WHAT WE'RE TRYING TO DO AS A COUNCIL AND AS A TOWN STAFF IS TO MEET YOU WHERE YOU ARE. WE WANT YOU TO BE ABLE TO DEVELOP THE LOTS THAT YOU WANT TO DEVELOP AND THE WAY YOU ENVISION IT. SO THE BEST WAY TO DO THAT IS TO HAVE YOU REDLINE THE KNOLLS DOCUMENT, BRING IT BACK TO STAFF, LET THEM HAVE FEEDBACK IF THERE'S ANY RED FLAGS OR ISSUES. I DON'T ANTICIPATE A LOT OF ISSUES, BUT WE REALLY WANT TO START WITH WHAT YOUR VISION IS AND HOW YOU WOULD MOLD THE KNOLLS DOCUMENT TO YOUR NEEDS AND THEN WE CAN GO FROM THERE. I THINK THAT'S THE BEST WAY TO MEET YOU WHERE YOU'RE AT. AND I TELL YOU AND THE TOWN MANAGER SAID THAT IF YOU DO THAT, HE'LL BRING IT BACK AT THE NEXT MEETING. SO I THINK WE COULD BE RESOLVED IN TWO WEEKS. I THINK WHAT I'D LIKE TO DO IS TABLE THAT PIECE FOR A SECOND AND GO TO CONCERN NUMBER ONE AND SEE IF HOW FAR WE ARE APART ON WHICH ONE. THE HANDOUT THAT YOU HAVE CALLED TOWN STAFF CONCERN NUMBER ONE. AND LET'S SEE HOW FAR WE REALLY ARE APART TO SEE IF THERE IS A POSITION WHERE WE THINK THAT WE CAN GET SOMEWHERE OR NOT. THAT AGREEABLE. YEAH. SO ONE OF THE THINGS THAT JASON BROUGHT UP ON THE HERE. ONE OF HIS KEY POINTS WAS THE SETBACKS, WHICH WE ALREADY TALKED ABOUT THE SOLANA QUEUING OF GOING INTO THE GATE AND WORRYING ABOUT TRAFFIC AND WANTING TO PUT IN A EASTBOUND ON SOLANA, A CUT THROUGH. AND BUT HE VERBALIZED TO YOU WAS HE WAS WORRIED ABOUT SAFETY AND WORRYING ABOUT QUEUING. I WAS WONDERING IF MAYBE HE COULD GIVE US A LITTLE BIT MORE INFORMATION WHERE HE GOT THAT CONCERN AND IF HE CAN KIND OF WALK US THROUGH IT. SORRY. YOU'RE ASKING WHY WE THINK A CUT THROUGH WOULD BE IMPORTANT? YES. SO I GUESS MY BUT I'D LIKE JASON TO SAY, I MEAN, HE WROTE IT. I'D LIKE HIS INPUT. WELL, ACTUALLY, MR. BONILLA, THAT IS A SHARED CONCERN OF TOWN STAFF AND TOWN COUNCIL. I APPRECIATE THAT, AND AS A PLANNER, WE'RE ALWAYS CONCERNED ABOUT THE SAFETY OF MOTORISTS AND PEDESTRIANS AND WHEN YOU GET TO THE ENGINEERING SIDE, [01:10:05] THAT'S WHERE YOU HAVE MORE OF THE STATISTICS AND THE DATA. BUT GIVEN THE FUTURE DEVELOPMENT WITHIN WESTLAKE, GIVEN THE DESIRABILITY OF ENTRADA, WE NEED TO MAKE SURE THAT THERE'S ADEQUATE QUEUING. AND ALSO CONSIDERING THE FACT THAT NOT ALL MOTORISTS THAT COME THROUGH ON SOLANA BOULEVARD ARE PAYING ATTENTION TO THE POSTED SPEED LIMITS. WE WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT AS PEOPLE ARE PULLING OFF TO GET INTO THIS DEVELOPMENT, THAT THERE'S ADEQUATE QUEUING GOING EASTBOUND, AND THAT IS A LEGITIMATE CONCERN WITH ANY DEVELOPMENT THAT WOULD COME INTO A TOWN LIKE WESTLAKE OR OTHER COMMUNITIES IN NORTH TEXAS. COULDN'T AGREE MORE. I'D LIKE TO SEE SOME DATA. I HEAR THE WORD CONCERN HERE, THE BELIEF. BUT WHAT I'D LIKE TO KNOW IS FROM YOUR ENGINEERING THAT YOU JUST TALKED ABOUT, WHERE CAN YOU GIVE ME SOME NUMBERS YOU PUT TOGETHER SO THAT I CAN UNDERSTAND THAT. FRANK. ALTERNATIVELY, WOULD YOU RATHER NOT HAVE A CUT IN FRONT OF YOUR GATE AND JUST LET CARS U-TURN AND COME BACK UP UP THE WESTBOUND SIDE? I'D LIKE TO UNDERSTAND THE PROCESS BEFORE I GIVE YOU AN ANSWER, MIKE. I JUST DON'T I JUST I'LL DEFER TO THE OTHER COUNCIL MEMBERS. I'M NOT SURE IF THIS IS THE PLACE WHERE WE GO DO A CITY PLANNING COURSE. BUT IF THEY'D LIKE TO. I'LL CONTINUE. I THINK HE I THINK HE WANTS TO SAY. WAIT. GO AHEAD. SO THE WAY THIS WORKS IN ALL OTHER CITIES IS IF THERE IS A REQUIREMENT, IT'S ON THE DEVELOPER AND WE'RE TRYING TO KEEP THAT FROM HAPPENING. RIGHT. WE SAW A CONCERN. YOU CAN DRIVE THROUGH THERE AT 5:00 IN THE EVENING AND YOU CAN SEE QUEUING JUST TRYING TO TURN INTO TOWN CENTER OR NOT TOWN CENTER. I'M SORRY, BUT TOWN HALL DRIVEWAY ON SOLANA BOULEVARD BECAUSE YOU'RE WAITING FOR AN ABUNDANT AMOUNT OF WESTBOUND TRAFFIC. WE COULD EASILY ASK FOR A TIA BECAUSE WE FEEL LIKE THAT A TIA IS NEEDED FOR THIS, BUT WE DIDN'T FEEL LIKE THAT THE DEVELOPER WOULD WANT TO PARTICIPATE IN THAT. I JUST FOUND OUT ABOUT THIS AT NOON. SO AS I'M EATING MY SANDWICH AT MY DESK, I WENT AHEAD AND TRIED TO UNDERSTAND THESE NUMBERS THAT I COULDN'T SEE. I UNDERSTAND THERE'S A CONCERN, BUT NO DATA TO BACK IT UP. SO I'D LIKE TO TAKE YOU TO PAGE FOUR. IT SAYS WESTLAKE GATED COMMUNITIES MAP. YOU HAVE VENTANAS, GRANADA, THE KNOLLS, VAQUERO, AND QUAIL HOLLOW. VENTANAS HAS A FOUR CAR STACK CAPABILITY WITH 51 HOMES. GRANADA HAS A 19 CAR STACK WITH 81 HOMES. THE KNOLLS HAS SEVEN WITH 41 HOMES. THE CAROL 11 WITH 281 HOMES. QUAIL HOLLOW SEVEN CARS STACKED WITH 84 HOMES. STICK WITH ME ON PAGE SIX. EXCUSE ME. PAGE FIVE. THIS IS FROM THE QUESTION. BECAUSE I'M CONFUSED. I THOUGHT THAT YOUR CONCERN WAS ABOUT THE CUT THROUGH, NOT ABOUT THE STACKING. I MEAN, THEY GO HAND IN HAND. WE HAVE A STACKING INDUSTRY BECAUSE WHAT HE JUST MENTIONED A SECOND AGO WAS PEOPLE COMING DOWN THAT ARE NOT LISTENING TO THE UNFAMILIAR WITH THE ROAD. THEY'RE UNFAMILIAR WITH THE SPEED LIMIT. HE'S WORRIED ABOUT THE QUEUING UP TO GO INTO THE NEIGHBORHOOD. THAT'S ONE OF HIS CONCERNS. OKAY. THE OTHER IS TO ALLEVIATE THAT CONCERN HE WANTS TO CUT THROUGH. SO I GUESS I'M JUST THINKING OF EVERY OTHER NEIGHBORHOOD IN THE COMMUNITY. HAS A, HAS THE ABILITY TO TURN FROM EITHER DIRECTION INTO A NEIGHBORHOOD. I MEAN, I CAN'T THINK OF ANY NEIGHBORHOOD THAT DOES NOT HAVE A CUT THROUGH IN FRONT OF THEIR ENTRANCE. WELL, LET'S TAKE A LOOK AT THE DATA. ACCORDING TO TXDOT, THE TRAFFIC COUNT. I AM ON PAGE FIVE RIGHT HERE. ON SOLANA. THERE'S 4605 VEHICLES PER DAY ON DAVIS. 10,303 VEHICLES TODAY PER DAY. LET'S GIVE YOU THOSE NUMBERS, BECAUSE I'M TRYING TO FIGURE OUT HOW THAT CONCERN COMES ABOUT, HOW I CAN LOOK AT IT, DIGEST IT. PARDON ME. THE DATE OF THE STUDY. IN FACT, THEY UPDATED IT IN 2024. ON THE NEXT PAGE, THE UPDATED NUMBERS ARE A DECREASE IN SOLANA BY 2%. THE REASON FOR THAT DECREASE IS PROBABLY BECAUSE OF THE ONCOMING 114 CUT THROUGH SIDE. IT'S GOING TO BE MY ASSUMPTION, BUT I'M JUST GOING WITH THE NUMBERS THAT TX-DOT HAS. ON PAGE SIX. IT SAYS THE NUMBER IS TRENDING DOWN 2%. BUT LET'S KEEP GOING TO KEEP TO UNDERSTAND WHAT WE'VE GOT. THE VENTANAS ENTRY SPACE FROM CAMPUS TO THE ENTRY IS 445FT. NOW, YOU'RE FAMILIAR WITH THE TECH STOCK. YOU BROUGHT IT. [01:15:03] I SAW IT TODAY IN THE. ON THE INTERNET. IT SAYS THAT THIS FOR 45 IS BEYOND WHAT'S REQUIRED. EVEN THOUGH THIS ROAD IS NOT A TECH STOCK CONTROLLED ROAD. I JUST THREW THAT IN THERE BECAUSE I WANTED TO MAKE SURE WE WERE CLARIFYING THAT THIS WAS NOT A ROAD THAT WAS MAINTAINED BY TECH STOCK. IT'S NOT AND IT'S IN THE IT'S CLEARLY STATED IN MY STATEMENT. IT'S NOT. BUT THEIR NUMBER IS IMPORTANT TO KNOW WHAT 445FT WE'RE. WELL WE'RE 445FT WHICH IS BEYOND WHAT TECH STOCK WOULD REQUIRE. BUT LET'S LOOK AT EASTBOUND AND WESTBOUND TRAFFIC. SO FOR THOSE OF YOU WHO ARE CHALLENGED BY EASTBOUND AND WESTBOUND WE'LL GO. WE'LL MAKE PRETTY EASY. THANK YOU. WE'LL GO WE'LL GO WESTBOUND COMING FROM LIFETIME FITNESS GOING TO CVS OKAY. THAT IS A THREE LANE ROAD AT 35MPH EASTBOUND. ONE OF THE CONCERNS HERE IS THREE LANES COMING FROM CVS MOVING TOWARDS LIFETIME FITNESS. IT'S THREE LANES PLUS A LEFT HAND TURN CUT THAT'S ALREADY EMBEDDED IN THE IN THE ROAD. OKAY. WE'RE GOING TO TURN THE PAGE AND WE'RE GOING TO LOOK AT HOW STACKING OCCURS. REMEMBER WE'RE EASTBOUND. THERE ARE CARS ONE AND TWO ARE ON THE CUT THROAT. CARS THREE THROUGH TEN ARE ON THE DESIGNATED LANE THAT'S ALREADY HERE. THERE'S THREE LANES PLUS A TURN LANE ALREADY EMBEDDED IN SOLANA. SO A LOT OF QUEUING UP, GOING ON, EVEN IF YOU'RE NOT LISTENING OR LOOKING AND YOU'RE UNFAMILIAR WITH THESE ROADS, YOU HAVE THREE LANES TO PICK FROM THE TURN LANE. ONLY WESTBOUND IS THREE LANES. WE'LL GET TO THAT HERE. WE'LL GET TO THAT BACK. WE'LL GET THAT IN A SECOND. BUT YOU CAN EASILY SEE THIS QUEUING UP OF WORRYING ABOUT TRAFFIC, STOPPING AND GETTING HIT. I DON'T SEE IT HAPPENING. BUT HERE IS THE PAGE THAT I'D LIKE TO TALK MORE ABOUT. PAGE TEN. AND THESE ARE THE STATISTICS THAT GO TO CAR STACKING VERSUS TOTAL HOMES. WHAT I TRIED TO TAKE A LOOK AT VERY QUICKLY TODAY IS HOW MANY HOMES ARE IN VENTANAS, GRANADA, THE KNOLLS, QUAIL HOLLOW AND VAQUERO. HOW MANY HOMES ARE THERE? HOW MUCH STACKING IS AVAILABLE TO EACH? I'D LIKE YOU TO TAKE TO VAQUERO AND ALSO QUAIL HOLLOW. THEY SEE 10,000 CARS PER DAY. THEY HAVE SOME OF THE LEAST STACKING AVAILABLE. AND THEY HAVEN'T HAD A PROBLEM. RIGHT. YOU'VE GOT GRANADA THAT CAN STACK 19 CARS IN THE LONGEST STACKING AVAILABLE 412FT. YOU'RE WELCOME. 23% IF YOU DO THE MATH. TOTAL STACKING VERSUS TOTAL HOMES, WHICH IS A BREAKDOWN OF CARS THAT ARE AVAILABLE TO YOU. THEY'RE PROVIDING A RATIO OF 23%. VENTANAS DECIDED TO PUT TWO LANES TO THEIR ENTRANCE. THOSE WHO ARE FAMILIAR WITH VAQUERO, YOU HAVE ONE LANE, AND THEN IT KIND OF HAS A LITTLE VISITOR LANE OFF TO THE SIDE. WE DECIDED TO MAKE BOTH LANES THE SAME SIZE. SO VISITORS COME FROM ONE SIDE AND GUEST VISITORS FROM ONE SIDE AND RESIDENTS RIGHT NEXT TO THEM. SO YOU HAVE 14 CARS STACKING UP AUTOMATICALLY. THAT'S HUGE. SO WHEN I HEAR ABOUT SAFETY, I'M CONCERNED ABOUT IT VERY MUCH. BUT I'M VERY CONCERNED ABOUT THE DATA AND HOW THAT DATA RELATES TO CONCERNS. ALL I'VE TRIED TO DO IS TAKE THE DATA THAT'S AVAILABLE, TAKE IT DOWN TO DISTANCE AND ASK MYSELF AND ASK YOU, IS THIS DATA SATISFYING TO SAY WE HAVE MORE THAN ENOUGH. WE HAVE MORE THAN VAQUERO, MORE THAN QUAIL HOLLOW. THEY SEE MORE CARS, AND THEIR MILES PER HOUR IS FIVE MILES AN HOUR, FIVE MILES AN HOUR FASTER. SO MY CONCERN IS, OKAY, SO IF YOU DRIVE DOWN EITHER DAVIS OR DOVE AT JUST BEFORE 7AM EVERY MORNING, THERE'S GOING TO BE A LINE OF SERVICE VEHICLES AND CONSTRUCTION VEHICLES BACKING UP ON THOSE ROADS ALL MORNING UNTIL THAT GATE. HOW WOULD YOU ACCOMMODATE THAT HERE? BECAUSE IF THOSE CARS ARE QUEUING TO TRY TO MAKE THAT TURN, THAT'S GOING TO PREVENT ALL THE TRAFFIC COMING INTO TOWN HALL, INTO THIS DEVELOPMENT. YOU'RE BACKING THAT UP. WELL, LET'S TURN THE PAGE. WE'RE GOING TO I'LL SHOW YOU THE STACKING. THAT'S NOT YOUR QUESTION, MS. GREAVES, BUT WE'LL GO TO THE NEXT PAGE WHICH SHOWS THAT FROM SOLANA. SO I'M ON PAGE 12. I THINK WE GOT THE STACKING ALREADY TAKEN CARE OF. WE'LL GO TO PAGE 12. THERE'S THAT BACK ENTRANCE. SO OFF OF SOLANA YOU TAKE A LEFT HAND, TURN ONTO CORTEZ. THAT LEADS YOU TO A CUT THROUGH THAT YOU CAN COME IN THE BACK OF VENTANAS. [01:20:07] SO YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT THE STACKING THAT YOU'RE WORRIED ABOUT AT 7:00 IN THE MORNING? IT DOESN'T SEEM TO HAVE BEEN A PROBLEM AT QUAIL HOLLOW. NO ONE'S BEEN HURT. THEY'VE GOT THE SAME CUT THROUGH THE WEEK. THEY HAVE THE SAME SIDE ROAD THAT WE HAVE. WELL, THEY HAVE A CUT THROUGH. THAT'S FOR THE CONSTRUCTION PEOPLE. EXACTLY RIGHT. SO I'M PLANNING. SO ARE YOU SAYING YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE A SEPARATE GATE FOR CONSTRUCTION GATE? WELL, THAT'S THE CORTEZ GATE. EXCUSE ME. THE CORTEZ I'M HAVING PAGE 12. SO ARE YOU DELINEATING THAT AS THE FORMAL SERVICE OR CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE? THAT'S CORRECT, MA'AM. OKAY. OKAY. SO THERE'S THAT NEW BECAUSE I DON'T THINK THAT WAS ON THERE. WE'VE TALKED ABOUT THIS. SORRY. WE'VE TALKED ABOUT THIS THAT WE WERE GOING TO. WELL, SO THE CUT THROUGH I'M JUST CONFUSED BECAUSE THE PLAN THAT WE SAW ATTACHED TO THE PACKET DIDN'T HAVE THIS GATE THERE. IT'S THE DRAWINGS THAT I'VE SUBMITTED FOR TIMES SHOW A BACK GATE. NO, BUT IS IT LABELED ON THE PLANS? YES. TO BE IT'S HAVE SIGNAGE AS CONSTRUCTION. I THINK THAT'S WHAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT FRANK. I'D BE MORE THAN HAPPY TO DELINEATE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE AND IF . SO, CAN YOU EXPLAIN TO ME THEN WHERE ARE YOUR. WHERE ARE THESE PEOPLE GOING TO QUEUE FOR THIS CONSTRUCTION? ARE THEY GOING TO QUEUE IN THE RESIDENTIAL AREA OF THERE IN THE PARKING LOT? THEY'RE GOING DOWN CORTEZ, WHERE YOU SEE THE STAR, WHERE IT SAYS ONE THAT'S ACTUALLY A CUT THROUGH. OKAY, SO YOU POINTED OUT THERE TO ME, THAT'S THEIR CUT THROUGH. DO YOU WANT TO SAY SOMETHING? PLEASE? YES, PLEASE. MAYOR. TOWN COUNCIL. I THINK THERE ARE A NUMBER OF NUMBER OF CONSIDERATIONS WITH THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT THAT IS IN FRONT OF YOU THIS EVENING. THE FIRST THING IS THAT WE'RE PEERING INTO THE FUTURE AND TRYING TO SAFEGUARD AGAINST THAT, WITH PRELIMINARY SITE PLANS THAT ARE NOT LEGALLY BINDING. WE ALSO WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT WE HAVE ADEQUATE QUEUING FOR VEHICLES, AND I REALLY WON'T BE DETERMINED UNTIL THERE'S AN ACTUAL FINAL PLAT THAT IS SUBMITTED FOR US TO REVIEW AND APPROVE. THAT IS DONE ADMINISTRATIVELY. SO WITH RESPECT TO THE QUEUING, WE'RE TRYING TO ADDRESS THAT UPFRONT. I KNOW THAT THERE WERE SOME CONCERNS ABOUT HAVING A GATED FEATURE AND WHAT THE LENGTH OF THAT THROAT WOULD BE FOR THE GATE WHEN WE WERE FIRST TALKING ABOUT THIS DEVELOPMENT, AND I THINK THAT THERE WAS STILL SOME MOVEMENT WITH THAT BEING RELATIVELY NEW AT THAT POINT IN TIME WHEN WE WERE TALKING ABOUT THIS DEVELOPMENT. THAT WAS THE WHOLE POINT FOR WANTING TO HAVE THAT LEFT HAND TURNING MOVEMENT WAS THAT THERE WAS ADDITIONAL STACKING JUST IN CASE, TO BE ON THE SAFE SIDE FOR QUEUING ISSUES, AS WELL AS CONCERNED ABOUT MOTORISTS AND PEDESTRIANS, BECAUSE, AGAIN, THERE AREN'T ANY SIDEWALKS ALONG SOLANA BOULEVARD AND I HAVE SEEN PEOPLE THAT HAVE BEEN OUT JOGGING AT ALL TIMES OF DAY AND MAKING SURE AGAIN THAT PEDESTRIANS AND MOTORISTS ARE CARED FOR WITH RESPECT TO SAFETY. SO IF THAT'S SOMETHING THAT SHOULD BE DELAYED OR FURTHER STUDIED AS PART OF THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, THAT COULD CERTAINLY BE A CONSIDERATION. BUT AGAIN, THAT WAS THE THOUGHT PROCESS BEHIND WANTING TO FUTURE PROOF THE DEVELOPMENT WITH THE ADJACENT AREAS, THAT THERE IS A JOGGING TRAIL ALL ALONG SOLANA, THE ENTIRE WAY THERE IS JUST SO YOU KNOW, BUT YOU CAN CROSS THE STREET. THAT'S WHAT WE DO. JUST AS THE ONLY PERSON HERE, PROBABLY, WHO LIVES OFF OF SOLANA BOULEVARD AND DRIVES IT EVERY DAY, MORE THAN PROBABLY ANYBODY IN THIS ROOM I THINK CUT THROUGHS, GOING TO BE SIX ONE, HALF DOZEN THE OTHER. I THINK IT'S A PERSONAL OPINION. I THINK IF I WAS A RESIDENT LIVING IN THERE, I'D LIKE TO CUT THROUGH BECAUSE IT ALLOWS ME TO TURN LEFT EASIER AS A PERSON THAT DRIVES ON THAT ROAD AND LIVES THERE, EVERY CUT THROUGH THAT'S IN THAT ROAD IS A BIT OF A NIGHTMARE. IT'S A SAFETY ISSUE. PEOPLE FLY THROUGH THEM. THEY DON'T REALLY STOP AT THE STOP SIGNS. I THINK IF WE LOOK FORWARD WHAT WE'RE GOING TO DO WITH SOLANA, EVENTUALLY THERE'S GOING TO BE STOP SIGNS OR LIGHTS AT THE MAJORITY OF THOSE CUT THRUS, WHICH SLOW DOWN THE TRAFFIC DRAMATICALLY AND GET ALL THE PEOPLE THAT USE SOLANA AS A PASS THROUGH TO STOP USING IT AS A PASS THROUGH, BECAUSE IT'S GOING TO SLOW THEM DOWN. THAT WOULD BE MY PERSONAL DESIRE, BECAUSE THERE'S TOO MANY PEOPLE THAT USE IT AS A BYPASS FOR 114 WHEN TRAFFIC BACKS UP. IF YOU PUT THE CUT THROUGH THERE, YOU MIGHT BE ALLEVIATING A ISSUE THAT MAY OR MAY NOT OCCUR WITH STACKING, BUT YOU'RE GOING TO CREATE OTHER ISSUES WITH CARS PULLING OUT IN FRONT OF OTHER CARS THAT ARE ACCELERATING VERY ACCELERATING VERY RAPIDLY AT THAT POINT IN TIME, FROM THE PRIOR STOP SIGN THAT WE GOT PUT IN FRONT OF OUR NEIGHBOR. THAT DRAMATICALLY ENHANCED SAFETY. SO I'M NOT GOING TO GET WOUND UP ABOUT A CUT THROUGH. I'M NOT WORRIED ABOUT THE CARS STACKING UP. I DON'T SEE I DRIVE THE ROAD TEN TIMES EVERY DAY. I DON'T SEE A LOT OF CARS STACKING UP AT THE TIMES THAT RESIDENTS ARE TRYING TO GET IN AND OUT OF THERE TOO MUCH. [01:25:01] BUT THAT'S ME. BUT AND AGAIN, SOMEBODY WHO DRIVES THERE. BUT I THINK IT'S A RESIDENT CONCERN. BUT THAT'S NOT UP TO ME TO DECIDE. THE DEVELOPER SHOULD BE DECIDING HOW HE WANTS TO TREAT THE TRAFFIC COMING IN OUT OF THERE. I WOULD LIKE LESS CUT THROUGHS PERSONALLY AND SOMEBODY LIVES ON THERE IS CUT THROUGH ABSOLUTELY MORE DANGEROUS. OR THEY TURN RIGHT AND GO DOWN SOLANA BOULEVARD. IT IS. THEY'RE GOING TO BE GOING AROUND. I DO U-TURNS EVERY DAY GOING OUT OR CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE WHEN THE FRONT ENTRANCE IS CLOSED. WELL, I UNDERSTAND WHERE YOU'RE COMING FROM, TODD. I THINK I WOULD AGREE WITH YOU ON MOST EVERYTHING YOU SAID. THE ONE CAVEAT THAT I HAVE IS I REALLY THINK TRAFFIC SHOULD BE MOVING FROM CONTINENTAL, WHICH IS ONE LANE EACH DIRECTION OVER TO SOLANA, WHICH IS THREE LANES EACH DIRECTION AND I REALLY APPRECIATE THE FACT THAT YOU'RE ENTRANCE HERE HAS TWO LANES FOR ENTRANCE. THAT'S FANTASTIC. ON THE OTHER HAND, LIKE JASON IS SAYING, WE ARE LOOKING INTO THE FUTURE AND YOUR DEVELOPMENT IS IN A VERY HIGH DENSITY AREA. YOU'VE GOT ENTRADA RIGHT THERE ON THE LEFT, YOU'VE GOT THE CVS AND THE SHOPPING CENTER, YOU'VE GOT THE SOLANA BUSINESS, YOU KNOW, COMPOUND, YOU'VE GOT GRANADA ON THE OTHER SIDE AND THE KNOLLS. SO THIS IS A VERY HIGH DENSITY KIND OF NEIGHBORHOOD COMPARED TO THE QUAIL HOLLOW AND EVEN VAQUERO. SO I THINK THERE ARE SOME THINGS TO CONSIDER. I REALLY DO LIKE YOUR TWO ENTRANCE LANES. THAT DOES HELP SOME. BUT I THINK THERE'S MORE THOUGHT THAT WE PROBABLY HAVE TO PUT INTO WITH THE LEFT TURN LANE. I'D LIKE TO SAY THAT THE TRAFFIC COUNTS. WELL, I UNDERSTAND YOUR INPUT. THE TRAFFIC COUNTS FOR THE YEARS DON'T SUPPORT THAT. THE TRAFFIC COUNTS BY TXDOT SHOW 10,000 CARS GOING DOWN. DAVIS. YEAH. CURRENTLY. BUT THAT 10,000 CARS. WE ONLY HAVE 51 HOMES. LISTEN, FRANK, I DON'T WANT TO ARGUE WITH THIS. I THINK THAT THERE'S A DIFFERENCE OF OPINION ON LOOKING FORWARD. AND I THINK THAT DIFFERENCE OF OPINION EXISTS AND PROBABLY SHOULD BE EXPLORED A LITTLE BIT MORE. I'LL JUST SAY THAT WE DON'T HAVE A STACK UP ISSUE IN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD AND THE BIG REASON IS THE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE THAT WHEN CONSTRUCTION IS GOING ON, WE NEED THAT CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE. WHEN WE CLOSE THE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE, AS THE THE BUILDING GETS DOWN TO A STANDSTILL, WE'LL NEVER HAVE A AND WE DON'T NEED 19 CARS BECAUSE WE ONLY GO TO TWO LANES AND THERE'S A FIVE CAR BUFFER RIGHT THERE. AND I'VE NEVER BEEN BACKED UP ONCE GOING INTO THE NEIGHBORHOOD. SO I ALSO ASKED, DIDN'T WE HAVE A TIA IN ATEA IN 20. IN MARCH OF 2023 STUDY. AND WHAT DID THEY SAY ABOUT THAT LIGHT? RIGHT. AGAIN, WE DIDN'T MEET THE TRAFFIC COUNTS TO PUT THE LIGHT IN YET. HOWEVER, THAT INTERSECTION IS DIFFERENT BECAUSE THE MONEY FOR THAT LIGHT IS ACTUALLY ALREADY ESCROWED TO BE PUT IN ONCE WE MEET THE TRAFFIC COUNTS. SO IF YOU'RE TELLING ME THAT YOU WOULD RATHER DO SOMETHING LIKE THAT WHERE WE'RE ESCROWING MONEY FOR A TURN LANE WHEN WE HIT THE TRAFFIC COUNTS AND A CUT THROUGH, THEN WE'D BE WILLING TO DO SOMETHING LIKE THAT. THE PROBLEM IS, IS WE HAVE A FUTURE THAT THAT IS GOING TO BE MORE DENSE, MORE PEOPLE ON HIGHWAY 114 THAT'S GOING TO CUT THROUGH MORE DENSITY AND ENTRADA AND MORE TRAFFIC ON SOLANA BOULEVARD, PARTICULARLY THE WESTBOUND TRAFFIC, WHICH WILL CAUSE US TO HAVE PEOPLE WAITING TO TURN LEFT INTO YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD. AND WE'RE JUST TRYING TO ENSURE THE SAFETY OF YOUR FUTURE RESIDENTS. ALL DUE RESPECT, THESE ARE ALL ASSUMPTIONS OF MAYBE NOTHING. NO FACTUAL DATA. DATA THAT TX-DOT IS PUTTING FORWARD SHOWED 10,000 CARS ON DAVIS, WHICH IS A MUCH MORE HEAVILY TRAVELED ROAD AND WILL CONTINUE TO BE BECAUSE IT CONNECTS SOUTHLAKE. THE IDEA THAT 51 HOMES IS GOING TO IMPACT AND GO FROM 4000 CARS TO SURPASS DAVIS. I JUST DON'T SEE THAT AS EVEN BE A VIABLE ARGUMENT. WE'RE NOT TALKING ABOUT PEOPLE. WE'RE TALKING ABOUT ALL AROUND THE CITY OF SAN ANTONIO. THEY'RE LISTED HERE. THAT WOULD BE THE KNOLLS. THAT WOULD BE GRANADA. THEY'RE ALREADY THERE. MAYOR, I APOLOGIZE. MAY I ASK FOR A REREADING OF THE QUESTION THAT'S IN FRONT OF THE COUNCIL TONIGHT, JUST SO WE CAN DECIDE IF WE'RE MAKING HEADWAY OR CANDIDLY, IF WE SHOULD MAKE A REQUEST TO TABLE IT. BUT I WANT TO UNDERSTAND WHAT IT IS WE'RE ASKED TO DECIDE ON TONIGHT. THE AGENDA ITEM IS DISCUSSED. CONSIDER AN ACT TO APPROVE RESOLUTION 25-04 APPROVING THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE TOWN OF WESTLAKE, TEXAS AND OTTER PARTNERS LP FOR SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENTS FOR WESTLAKE VENTANA AS A RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT TO BE DESIGNED AND BUILT ADJACENT TO LLANO BOULEVARD. I APPRECIATE YOU READING THAT. I JUST THINK IT'S IMPORTANT. I THINK THAT WHAT WE'RE ASKED TO DO TONIGHT IS TO APPROVE THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. [01:30:06] I THINK PROBABLY WE HAVE SOME A NUMBER OF ISSUES. I'D MAKE A MOTION THAT WE TABLE UNTIL WE CAN GET SOME GREATER ALIGNMENT. PERHAPS AT THE NEXT MEETING WE COULD CONSIDER AND MAKE A DECISION ON THIS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. THERE'S BEEN A MOTION TO TABLE THIS AGENDA ITEM. DO I HAVE A SECOND? I SECOND IT. I THINK, FRANK, IF YOU CAN REDLINE THE KNOLLS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR US. WE CAN THEN TALK ABOUT THE SETBACKS, THE BRUSH AND THE LEFT TURN LANE. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. ANY OPPOSED? I WANT TO MAKE SURE. CLEARLY, MR. BONILLA. AND I KNOW THIS IS FRUSTRATING. ALL OF US. WE GOT A VERY CLEAR NEXT STEPS. RIGHT. I DON'T WANT THIS. WE'RE EXCITED FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT. IT DOESN'T SEEM LIKE IT TO YOU, BUT WE ARE EXCITED FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT, AND WE WANT TO GET THIS THING GOING. SO LET'S GET THIS CLEARED UP. AND AGAIN, AS I SIT HERE AND LISTEN TO THE CONVERSATION, I CAN'T THANK YOU ALL ENOUGH. THIS IS TO PROTECT BOTH SIDES AND I WANT TO MAKE SURE WE'RE DOING THAT. OKAY. I'LL LEAVE YOU WITH THE. I PROBABLY WON'T BE BACK. IT'S PROBABLY TOO MUCH FOR US TO CONTINUE. WE TRIED FOR TWO YEARS. SO WE'LL JUST PROBABLY TAKE IT BACK AND GO TO A MAYBE MORE DENSE PIECE, NOT WORRY ABOUT. WE'LL DO A CUT BACK, BUT I DON'T THINK WE'LL BE ABLE TO RESOLVE IT. FRANK, I THINK YOU'RE REALLY CLOSE. I THINK YOU JUST NEED TO STREAMLINE THESE DEVELOPMENT, THE ARCHITECTURAL REQUIREMENTS. I'M HAPPY TO SIT DOWN WITH YOU AND MEET WITH YOU IF YOU WANT, WHEN YOU DO THE RED LINE. AND I THINK WE COULD KNOCK IT OUT REALLY QUICKLY. I'LL GIVE IT SOME THOUGHT. I PROBABLY I'M GOING TO SAY NO, I DON'T KNOW IF YOU AS FAR AS SAFETY GOES, I WOULD HAVE LOVED TO SEE SOMETHING OTHER THAN WE THINK IT'S GOING TO GROW. WE THINK THIS IS GOING TO HAPPEN. VERY ANALYTICAL. TOOK ME LESS THAN 30 MINUTES TO PULL UP TEXT. THAT INFORMATION WOULD HAVE LOVED TO SEEN SOMETHING FROM STAFF BESIDES A IT'S GOING TO GROW, CITIES GROW. BUT I DON'T SEE THIS ROAD SOLANA BECOMING 1000 CAR A DAY SITUATION, ON TOP OF WHICH HAS NO PROBLEM. THEY HAVE 281 HOMES, NO STACKING ISSUE AS AN INSTANCE. WE'RE MORE THAN DOUBLE THEIR ABILITY TO GET IN MORE THAN DOUBLE. WE DON'T HAVE STAFF. WE DON'T HAVE GUEST GOLFERS. NONE OF THAT'S OCCURRING AT THIS DEVELOPMENT AT ALL. BUT IT'S REALLY EASY TO SAY, OH, WE WANT TO MAKE SURE WE'RE SAFE. I WANT TO MAKE SURE YOU'RE SAFE, TOO. THAT'S WHY I TRIED TO MAKE THESE DRAWINGS FROM DAY ONE. WE'VE ALWAYS SAID THAT WE WERE A TEN FOOT EASEMENT. AMAZING THAT WE GET TO THE FINAL PIECE, AND NOW ALL OF A SUDDEN, THAT WASN'T GOOD ENOUGH. SO I DON'T. I JUST DON'T THINK I CAN GET THERE. FRANK, I KNOW YOU'VE BEEN THROUGH A LOT. WE'RE TRYING VERY HARD TO DO OUR BEST TO MEET YOU WHERE YOU'RE AT. AND IF YOU DECIDE TO WALK AWAY, WE CAN'T CONTROL THAT. NO, I APPRECIATE THAT. I'LL MAKE MONEY EITHER WAY. SO IT'S JUST A MATTER IF I MAKE IT ON 51 LOTS OR WE DO IT A DIFFERENT WAY. SO IT'S OKAY AND I APPRECIATE IT. IT WAS GOOD TO GET UP HERE AND LET YOU AT LEAST KNOW WHERE I'M COMING FROM. I WORK REALLY WELL WITH NUMBERS. AND MISS GREAVES, I WOULD ENCOURAGE YOU BEFORE YOU THINK ABOUT A RED LINE TO READ 994 AND PUT THE KNOLLS 180 188 DOCUMENT. THE 994. YOU CAN LOOK AT THEM BOTH. WE'VE ALREADY EXTRACTED WHAT WE WERE SUPPOSED TO DO. I APPRECIATE YOUR TIME TONIGHT. THANK YOU. THANK YOU, MR. BONILLA. YOU BET. I THINK I ALREADY DID THIS. AGENDA ITEM G THREE. I THINK WE'RE GOING TO TABLE OUR TRUCK. THEN ON G4, CONSIDER APPROVING RESOLUTION 2502, AUTHORIZING THE TOWN MANAGER TO CONTRACT WITH IN CONTROL [G.4. Consider approving Resolution 25-02 authorizing the Town Manager to contract with inCon-Trol Water Systems to repair and update the existing well system at Glenwyck Park through a Master Interlocal Agreement with the City of Southlake in an amount not to exceed $71,000. (Cheryl Taylor, Director of Public Works)] WATER SYSTEMS, REPAIR, REPAIR, AND UPDATE THE EXISTING WELL SYSTEM AT GLENWOOD PARK THROUGH A MASTER INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $70,000. CHERYL. THANKS. THANK YOU. GOOD EVENING. THE TOWN OF WESTLAKE IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE OF THE INFRASTRUCTURE WITHIN GLENWOOD PARK, INCLUDING THE WELL THAT SUPPLIES THE PONDS WITH WATER FOR IRRIGATION AND MAINTAINS A CONSTANT ELEVATION FOR ESTHETIC PURPOSES. IN NOVEMBER, THE TOWN MANAGER WAS NOTIFIED THAT THE POND AT GLENWOOD PARK WAS LOW. THE POND IS SUPPLIED WATER BY AN EXISTING WELL THAT IS NEARLY 800FT DEEP. THE WELL IS FAILED AND NEEDS SUBSTANTIAL REPAIRS AND IMPROVEMENTS. STAFF CONTACTED SEVERAL VENDORS AND THEY DETERMINED THAT THE PUMP MOTOR HAD EXPERIENCED AN ELECTRICAL SHORT, WHICH REQUIRES THE PUMP TO BE PULLED AND BE REPLACED IN CONTROL. WATER SYSTEMS PROVIDED THE FOLLOWING SCOPE OF WORK. TASK. A WELL UPDATE AND REPAIR WHICH WHICH INCLUDES A NEW MOTOR, NEW PUMP, CHECK VALVES, ELECTRICAL WORK AND REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT OF THE FENCE TO ACCESS [01:35:07] THE TO ACCESS AND REPAIR THE WELL SYSTEM. TASK B UPDATE LEVEL CONTROL VALVE WHICH TELLS THE PUMP WHEN TO TURN ON AND OFF. THIS TASK WILL REQUIRE A NEW PANEL AND ELECTRICAL COMPONENTS SUCH AS A TRANSFORMER. LEVEL CONTROL RELAYS, BREAKER SWITCHES AND THE LABOR FOR THE ELECTRICIAN. TASK C LOAD CENTER. ADDITIONAL ELECTRICAL IMPROVEMENTS THAT ARE NECESSARY FOR SAFETY DUE TO THE CURRENT WIRING CONDITIONS AND TASK D INSTALLATION AND REPLACEMENT OF THE TRANSFORMER AS THE CURRENT TRANSFORMER THAT SUPPLIES POWER TO THE WELL AND POND FOUNTAINS IS IN FAULTY CONDITION AND IS CONSTANTLY TRIPPED. TOTAL COST IS ESTIMATED AT $62,161.73. PRICING FOR MAIN CONTROL IS BASED ON A IS BASED ON THEIR CONTRACT WITH THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE THAT THE TOWN CAN UTILIZE THROUGH A MASTER INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT THAT WAS RECENTLY APPROVED BY THE COUNCIL. WE ANTICIPATE COMPLETION OF THE REPAIRS WITHIN 60 TO 90 DAYS ONCE MATERIALS ARE ORDERED, DUE TO THE LONG LEAD TIMES ON SOME OF THE COMPONENTS. STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION IS THE APPROVAL OF A CONTRACT WITH IN CONTROL WATER SYSTEMS IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $71,000, WHICH INCLUDES APPROXIMATELY 12% CONTINGENCY TO COVER ANY UNFORESEEN PARTS OR LABOR COSTS THAT MAY BE REQUIRED ONCE THE PUMP IS PULLED. I'LL BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. COUNCIL. JUST ONE QUESTION, SHERYL. I NOTICED THAT THE BID WAS DATED DECEMBER 6TH AND HAD A 30 DAY WINDOW FOR APPROVAL. HAVE WE GOTTEN CONFIRMATION THAT THEY'RE GOING TO HOLD TO THIS PRICE? WE HAVE. I BELIEVE THAT THE LENGTH THAT THE CITY SECRETARY HAD PUT ON THE WEBSITE HAS BEEN UPDATED TO INCLUDE A NEW PROPOSAL, WHICH IS DATED JANUARY 20TH. SO THEY THEY DO PLAN TO HOLD THOSE. MY OLD ONE. SORRY. THANKS. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FROM COUNCIL? ANY I GET A MOTION TO APPROVE RESOLUTION 20 502. SO MOVED. CAN I GET A SECOND? SECOND. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. ANY OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES. AGENDA ITEM G FIVE. [G.5. Consider and act to excuse Mayor and Council absence(s), if any.] CONSIDER AN ACT TO EXCUSE MAYOR OR COUNCIL ABSENCES OF ANY. I KNOW MR. BALTO WAS TRAVELING. CAN I GET A MOTION TO EXCUSE HIS ABSENCE FROM LAST MEETING? SO MOVED. SO MOVED. TOUGH CROWD. MIKE, CAN I GET A SECOND? SECOND. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. ANY OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES. MR. CARROLL, WE HAVE A TRAINING. JOINT TRAINING WITH P&Z. DO WE WANT TO BE COURTEOUS? DO WE WANT TO DO THAT NOW AND THEN CONVENE IN EXECUTIVE SESSION, OR WHAT? CAN WE. THAT'S PERFECTLY FINE, SIR. YES, SIR. OKAY. THAT'S FINE. SO CLOSE OUT. THIS MEETING TO GO INTO IT IS NOW 5:38 AND WE'RE GOING TO GO INTO. I READ THIS RIGHT. WE'RE GOING TO GO INTO A JOINT TOWN COUNCIL PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION WORKSHOP AT 05:38PM. MR. MAYOR, YOU WANT TO GIVE ANYBODY CHECK TO SEE IF ANYBODY NEEDS A BREAK? YEAH, YEAH. WE DO. OKAY. YEAH, LET'S TAKE FIVE MINUTES JUST TO BE BECAUSE WE'RE RUNNING A LITTLE LATE. FIVE MINUTES. THANK Y'ALL. YEAH. * This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.