[00:00:05] ON THAT ON SPECIAL CALL TO SPECIAL MEETING ORDER AND ANNOUNCE A QUORUM IS PRESENT. [A. CALL SPECIAL MEETING TO ORDER AND ANNOUNCE A QUORUM PRESENT] [B.1. Receive the Roadway, Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Study Report prepared by consultant Freese and Nichols and Conduct a Public Hearing to receive comments from citizens and other interested parties concerning the potential adoption and imposition of roadway, water and wastewater impact fees.] WE'LL START OUT WITH PRESENTATION AND PUBLIC HEARING. CHERYL. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. GOOD EVENING, MAYOR AND COUNCIL. THIS EVENING IS OUR HOPEFULLY LAST PUBLIC HEARING FOR IMPACT FEES. THE PURPOSE OF THE MEETING THIS EVENING IS TO PRESENT TO YOU THE IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS AND THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE IMPACT FEES THAT CAN BE ASSESSED AND COLLECTED FOR WATER, WASTEWATER AND ROADWAYS. THE CONSULTANT WILL PRESENT THE IMPACT FEE CALCULATION METHODOLOGY, AND THEY'LL SHOW YOU SOME CHARTS SHOWING WHERE THE TOWN OF WESTLAKE LANDS IN COMPARISON WITH OUR BENCHMARK CITIES. AT THE AUGUST 11TH CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING, THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADOPTING IMPACT FEES AT THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE RATES FOR WATER, WASTEWATER AND ROADWAY. THE RECOMMENDATION LETTER, SIGNED BY CHAIRMAN COFFEY, WAS SENT TO THE COUNCIL BY EMAIL LAST WEEK AND IS INCLUDED IN YOUR PACKETS AT THE END OF THE CONSULTANT'S PRESENTATION THIS EVENING. YOU WILL NEED TO CONSIDER APPROVAL OF ORDINANCE 1028, ADOPT ADOPTING IMPACT FEES, THE RATE OF ASSESSMENT AND COLLECTION, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. STAFF RECOMMENDS ADOPTING ORDINANCE 1028 AT THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE RATES FOR WATER, WASTEWATER AND ROADWAYS WITH AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF AUGUST 25TH. ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS BEFORE I TURN IT OVER TO THE CONSULTANT? ANY OTHER PRESENTATION? NO, MA'AM. OKAY, I WILL LEAVE. YOU ALL ARE FAMILIAR WITH ANDREW. WE ARE WELCOME TO SEE YOU AGAIN. GOOD EVENING. HOW IS EVERYONE DOING TODAY? APPRECIATE YOU ALL COMING FOR A SPECIAL MEETING. WHILE WE KIND OF HAVE WHAT WE CALL HERE IS, LIKE CHERYL SAID, HOPEFULLY THE LAST PRESENTATION TO MAYBE GET TOWARDS A POTENTIAL IMPLEMENTATION OF THIS, OF THIS PROGRAM. SO WE'LL JUST REAL QUICK HIT ON THE BASICS AGAIN. AND THEN WE'LL GO THROUGH THE ACTUAL CALCULATIONS AND TALK ABOUT THOSE BENCHMARKING. YOU KNOW, REALLY THE INTENTION THERE IS TO GIVE A LOT OF DATA FOR Y'ALL TO HELP MAKE AN INFORMED DECISION MOVING FORWARD. SO, YOU KNOW, THE BASICS OF WHY WE'RE DOING THIS PROGRAM IS REALLY TO, YOU KNOW, TALK ABOUT HOW, YOU KNOW, NEW DEVELOPMENT WHEN THEY COME INTO THE TOWN. THEY HAVE AN IMPACT ON INFRASTRUCTURE. WE'RE TALKING ROADWAY WATER AND SEWER SYSTEMS HERE. AND THE PROGRAM ITSELF IS REALLY TO HAVE A MECHANISM FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT TO PAY. REALLY? NOT A FULL COST, REALLY, BUT REALLY WHAT IT IS A PROPORTION OF THE COST FOR IMPLEMENTING PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE THAT HELPS TO SERVE THEIR DEVELOPMENT. SO WE LIKE TO SAY IT'S REALLY GROWTH PAYING FOR GROWTH. WHAT IS IT GOING TO BE THEIR FAIR, EQUITABLE SHARE OF THE IMPACT TO THEIR THESE INFRASTRUCTURE SYSTEMS. SO WE FOLLOWED STATE LAW, CHAPTER 395 OF THE TEXAS LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE GIVES A VERY PRESCRIBED PROCEDURE FOR HOW WE ACTUALLY GO ABOUT DOING THIS PROCESS AND COMING UP WITH THE CALCULATIONS. IF A IF A PROGRAM WERE TO BE ADOPTED, IT WOULD BE REQUIRED BY STATE LAW TO BE REASSESSED ON A FIVE YEAR CYCLE AT A MINIMUM. SO REALLY WHAT THAT DOES IS YOU KIND OF RELOOK AT HOW THINGS CHANGE FROM A LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT PERSPECTIVE, AND WHAT ARE THE TRICKLE DOWN IMPACTS FOR INFRASTRUCTURE THAT COULD POTENTIALLY CHANGE YOUR FEE STRUCTURE? SO THE PROCESS WE'VE BEEN GOING THROUGH FOR THE LAST FEW MONTHS IS DEVELOPING THOSE LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS AND ELIGIBLE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLANS, WHICH WERE APPROVED AT A PREVIOUS PUBLIC HEARING. BUT A COUPLE MONTHS AGO, AT THIS POINT, THE ELIGIBLE CAPITAL PROJECTS ARE REALLY WHAT THEY DO IS THEY PROVIDE EXCESS CAPACITY TO HELP SERVE THAT GROWTH. SO PROJECTS THAT INCLUDE LIKE O&M TYPE THINGS OR REHABBING OR REFURBISHING CERTAIN ASSETS, YOU KNOW, THOSE ARE TYPES OF PROJECTS THAT AREN'T GOING TO BE ELIGIBLE UNDER THIS PROGRAM. IT'S REALLY PROJECTS THAT PROVIDE THAT EXTRA CAPACITY FOR OUR FUTURE PROJECTED GROWTH. BUT WE GO THROUGH WE DEVELOP THE PLANS THROUGH THE CALCULATIONS THAT WE'RE PRESENTING TODAY. CHERYL MENTIONED WE HAD THE CIAC MEETINGS AND THEY'VE RECOMMENDED AN APPROVAL OF THE OF THE IMPACT FEE PROGRAM. AND HERE WE ARE ON PUBLIC HEARING NUMBER TWO. SO THE CALCULATION ITSELF, YOU CAN SEE WE HAVE YOU DEVELOP. WHAT IS THAT IMPACT FEE ELIGIBLE COST. THAT'S GOING TO BE THE BLUE BOX IN OUR EQUATION. THE STATE LAW REQUIRES A YOU CAN EITHER DO A DETAILED FINANCIAL CREDIT ANALYSIS OR YOU CAN TAKE A 50% CREDIT. JUST KIND OF OFF THE TOP FOR THIS FIRST STUDY THAT WE'VE GONE THROUGH. [00:05:02] WE'VE OPTED FOR THE 50% CREDIT METHOD. SO YOU'LL SEE THE ELIGIBLE COST REALLY JUST KIND OF GETS CUT DOWN IN HALF OR 50%. AND THEN SO THAT COST IS GOING TO BE DIVIDED BY THE GROWTH IN SFLUE SINGLE FAMILY LIVING UNIT EQUIVALENTS. FOR THE WATER WASTEWATER SIDE. WE LOOK AT THAT IN TERMS OF ADDED METERS OR METER CAPACITY. AND THEN ON THE ROADWAY SIDE WE LOOK AT THE GROWTH IN VEHICLE MILES. SO YOU HAVE A COST DIVIDED BY A RATE OF GROWTH. AND SO YOU COME UP WITH A MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE COST NUMBER. SO THAT'S GOING TO BE THE MATH THAT WE'RE GOING TO WALK THROUGH TODAY ANDREW WITH THE STATE LAW AT 50%. DOES THAT MEAN THAT THE STATE EXPECTS THE EXISTING RESIDENTS BUSINESSES TO ABSORB 50% OF THE GROWTH? IS THAT OF THE GROWTH COSTS? THAT IS YEAH, THAT'S HOW THIS ONE METHOD WORKS. AGAIN, YOU CAN DO THAT DETAILED FINANCIAL ANALYSIS TO SEE IF YOU CAN GO ABOVE THAT 50% NUMBER. SO YOU CAN BE BETWEEN 50% AND THE TRUE 100%. BUT AGAIN, WE OPTED NOT TO DO THAT AT THIS TIME. THAT'S A DIFFICULT COMPUTATION. I MEAN, YOU HAVE TO YOU REALLY KIND OF HAVE TO LOOK BACKWARDS AT A LOT OF THE THE, WITH THE DEBT AND THE, YEAH, THE TIME FINANCIALS TO DETERMINE ARE WE COULD WE POTENTIALLY BE DOUBLE CHARGING THIS NEW DEVELOPMENT. SO THAT'S ESSENTIALLY WHAT THE 50% RULE COMES INTO. MAKE SURE THAT WE'RE NOT DOUBLE CHARGING OR THERE COULD BE DEBT AND DEBT SERVICE ASSOCIATED WITH THAT GROWTH THAT'S CAPTURED BY EVERYONE. YES, SIR. OKAY. ANDREW, TELL YOU ONE QUICK FOLLOW UP QUESTION ON THAT COUNCILMAN YOU SAID, IS IT A LOT SAFER TO JUST TAKE THE 50%? THAT'S SORT OF STANDARD AND ELIMINATES ANY POSSIBILITY OF FUTURE LITIGATION AROUND OVERCHARGING OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT. IS THAT PART OF THE INCENTIVE? THAT IS THAT IS DEFINITELY THE SAFER ROUTE. AND I'D SAY THE, THE MAJORITY, I WOULD SAY, OF FOLKS WHO HAVE THIS PROGRAM GO WITH THE 50%. COUNCILMEMBER DUANE, THAT'S EXACTLY CORRECT. ANY TIME YOU GIVE A CREDIT OF ANY KIND THAT CAN BE CHALLENGED IN COURT. SO THEY COULD, EVERY TIME WE ASSESS A FEE, THEY COULD TURN AROUND AND CHALLENGE THAT. EVERY SINGLE FEE WE ASSESS WITH THE 50% CREDIT, THAT'S LESS LIKELY TO OCCUR. BUT WALKING THROUGH THE WATER WASTEWATER SIDE OF THINGS. AGAIN, THESE ARE THESE ARE PROJECTS THAT HAVE BEEN PREVIOUSLY PRESENTED AND APPROVED BY TOWN COUNCIL. THE ON THE WATER SIDE OF ON THE WATER SIDE WE HAVE 14 PROPOSED PROJECTS. AND THESE ARE ALL PULLED DIRECTLY FROM THE TOWN'S WATER MASTER PLAN PROJECT. SO THE TYPES OF PROJECTS THAT WE'RE LOOKING AT HERE INCLUDE WATER SUPPLY, ADDITIONAL PUMP STATION PUMPING CAPACITY, STORAGE IN THE FORM OF GROUND TANKS, ELEVATED STORAGE TANKS, AS WELL AS TRANSMISSION MAINS IN ORDER TO CONNECT OUR FACILITIES TO WHERE OUR GROWTH IS. THAT'S KIND OF A A REALLY BRIEF, HIGH LEVEL RUNDOWN OF WHAT TYPES OF PROJECTS ARE GOING TO BE ELIGIBLE ON THE WATER SIDE. SO YOU CAN SEE THE TABLE HERE. THERE'S A LOT OF COLUMNS AND NUMBERS. I'LL QUICKLY KIND OF WALK THROUGH IT. SO THE 14 PROJECTS THE THE SET OF FIRST THREE COLUMNS, IT'S CALLED PERCENT UTILIZATION. YOU CAN SEE 20, 25, 20, 35. AND THEN THERE'S A TEN YEAR DELTA OF WHAT'S THE WHAT'S THE AMOUNT OF THAT PROPOSED PROJECT THAT SERVES CUSTOMERS IN 2025. AND THEN WHAT WOULD IT PROJECT TO DO IN 2035. SO WHAT'S THAT DIFFERENCE ARE GOING TO BE THAT PERCENT ELIGIBLE OF THE PROJECT? NOW YOU SEE SOME PROJECTS HAVE A PERCENTAGE GREATER THAN 0 IN 2025, WHICH IS OUR CURRENT BASE YEAR. SO SOME OF THOSE PROJECTS, ALTHOUGH THEY'RE NOT YET BUILT, THEY WOULD BE PROVIDING WATER SERVICE TO EXISTING CUSTOMERS. SO WE HAVE TO DISCOUNT WHAT THAT PERCENTAGE WOULD BE. SO IN TERMS OF PROJECT TWO, IF WE WERE TO BUILD A NEW PUMP STATION IN THE TOWN INITIALLY SOME OF THAT CAPACITY WOULD SERVE FOLKS WHO ARE ALREADY HERE RIGHT NOW. THAT KIND OF BECOMES A SECONDARY OR REDUNDANT FEED. RIGHT NOW WE HAVE THE ONE PUMP STATION THAT PROVIDES SERVICE TO THE WHOLE TOWN. WE PUT IN THAT SECONDARY PUMP STATION. WE'RE NOT ONLY GOING TO HELP WITH THAT FUTURE PROJECTED GROWTH, BUT WE'RE GOING TO PROVIDE THAT THAT CAPACITY TO EXISTING RESIDENTS. AND SO AND THEN, YOU KNOW, IN TEN YEARS TIME, HOW MUCH OF THOSE PROJECT CAPACITIES ARE WE USING? SO THAT'S THE PERCENT UTILIZATION COLUMNS. THE NEXT COLUMN, CAPITAL COST, IS THE REALLY THE ESTIMATED COST FOR ALL THESE DIFFERENT IMPROVEMENTS. IF YOU GO DOWN TO THE BOTTOM THERE PROPOSED PROJECT SUBTOTAL OVER $42 MILLION. SO THE LAST THREE COLUMNS AGAIN ARE GOING TO BE WHAT'S GOING TO BE THE CAPITAL COST TIMES THOSE PERCENTAGES FROM THE MIDDLE THREE COLUMNS, THOUGH. WHAT PERCENTAGE OF THAT CAPITAL COST SERVES CURRENT DEVELOPMENT? AND THEN IF I JUST MOVE OVER TO THE RIGHT HAND COLUMN BEYOND 2035, WHAT WHAT EXCESS CAPACITY DO WE HAVE IN THE FUTURE? [00:10:08] SO THOSE ARE GOING TO BE DOLLARS THAT AREN'T GOING TO BE ELIGIBLE AS WELL. SO THAT SECOND FROM THE RIGHT COLUMN, THE TEN YEAR 2025 TO 2035 COLUMN IS REALLY THE PORTION OF TOTAL COSTS THAT WE CAN PASS ON TO NEW DEVELOPMENT IN THE TEN YEAR WINDOW, GO DOWN TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT. SUBTOTAL $16,347,000 IS THE ELIGIBLE COST. WE'VE ALREADY BAKED IN $45,000 FOR THE WATER PORTION OF DOING AN UPDATE IN FIVE YEARS, WHICH IS ELIGIBLE UNDER STATE LAW. SO THE NEXT ROW IS LOOKING AT ADDING IN FINANCE AND INTEREST COSTS FOR THESE PROJECTS. AGAIN, AN ELIGIBLE ITEM TO BE INCLUDED UNDER STATE LAW. SO WHAT THAT BRINGS THE TOTAL IMPACT FEE FOR THE WATER SYSTEM TO BE $3,150,813. ANY QUESTIONS ON HOW I KIND OF WALKED THROUGH THAT? YES, SIR. ANDREW, THE THE FINANCING COSTS SHOWN, THERE ARE A COMBINATION OF ESTIMATED COSTS AS WELL AS THE BORROWING THAT WE DID THIS YEAR. IT IS, IT IS. YEAH. WE'VE GOT A THERE'S A THERE'S A LITTLE NOTE AT THE BOTTOM THAT WE'RE LOOKING AT A 20 YEAR BOND. SO THE FIRST TEN YEARS OF A 20 YEAR BOND AT A 4% INTEREST RATE. SO WE'RE KIND OF JUST MAKING A WE'RE CASTING A NET AND MAKING AN ASSUMPTION OF WHAT WE THINK WE WOULD BE SPENDING FROM A FINANCE OR INTEREST SIDE. BECAUSE OUR MOST CURRENT BOND OFFERING FIVE AND A QUARTER. SO BEING A LITTLE CONSERVATIVE AGAIN KIND OF PROTECTS US FROM POTENTIAL CHALLENGES DOWN THE ROAD. ON THE WASTEWATER SIDE OF THINGS. WE HAVE EIGHT PROJECTS. SEVEN OF THEM ARE GRAVITY MAIN EXTENSIONS TO SERVE IN AREAS WHERE WE'RE GOING TO HAVE FUTURE PROJECTED GROWTH. AND THEN THE EIGHTH PROJECT IS TO BE A PORTION OF THE TRA. THEY'RE GOING TO EXPAND THEIR DENTON CREEK WASTEWATER PLANT. AND SO THIS WOULD BE KIND OF A PORTION OF THE TOWN'S CONTRIBUTION TO THAT OVERALL TOTAL. WE'RE GOING TO BE PRODUCING MORE WASTEWATER FLOW. WE WANT THAT TO HELP KIND OF PAY FOR THE OVERALL IMPROVEMENTS TO THE SYSTEM. SO AGAIN, EIGHT PROJECTS. SAME, SAME METHODOLOGY AND PROCESS HERE. WE'VE GOT A PROPOSED PROJECT SUBTOTAL OF 8.5 MILLION. AND AGAIN, ANOTHER $45,000 FOR FUTURE UPDATE, 3.5 MILLION FOR FINANCING AND INTEREST. SO THAT BRINGS THE TOTAL WASTEWATER IMPACT FOR ELIGIBLE COSTS TO $12,103,140. SO GOING BACK TO THAT ORIGINAL EQUATION, THAT'S GOING TO BE THE BLUE BOX. OUR ELIGIBLE COST FOR WATER, WASTEWATER. BUT NOW I'M GOING TO MOVE TO THE DENOMINATOR SIDE WHERE WE TALK ABOUT THE GROWTH IN SUE OR SERVICE UNIT EQUIVALENTS. SO BASED ON DIFFERENT METER SIZES, YOU CAN SEE A THREE QUARTERS INCH METER HAS A CAPACITY OF 30 GALLONS PER MINUTE. THAT'S GOING TO BE THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT THAT IT CAN PASS THROUGH PER THE AMERICAN WATERWORKS ASSOCIATION STANDARDS ON METERS. AND SO THAT BECOMES OUR BASE METER OUR SERVICE UNIT EQUIVALENT OF ONE. AS METERS GET LARGER, THEY CAN TAKE MORE WATER. SO THEY CAN IMPACT THE SYSTEM MORE. SO THE RATIO OF THE LARGER METERS TO THE SMALL, THE OR THE BASE METER SIZE, YOU CAN SEE THAT THAT COLUMN ON THE RIGHT THOUGH BY BY LOGIC AND MATH, IF WE HAVE A LARGER METER, WE'RE POTENTIALLY SUBJECTED TO A HIGHER FEE. THE PROJECTED GROWTH IN SERVICE SERVICE UNIT EQUIVALENCE FOR WATER WASTEWATER. THAT'S GOING TO BE THE RIGHT HAND COLUMN ON EITHER ONE OF THESE TABLES. THE WE'VE PROJECTED OUT THE NUMBER OF METERS BY METER SIZE THAT WILL COME IN THIS TEN YEAR WINDOW, BASED ON THE BASED ON THE LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS. WE HAVE A TOTAL OF 2160 IS GOING TO BE OUR TEN YEAR GROWTH IN SERVICE UNIT EQUIVALENTS. WE'LL POINT OUT THE THE ONE DIFFERENCE HERE YOU'LL SEE FOR THE EXISTING SUVS ON THE WATER, 2680, WHICH IS SLIGHTLY HIGHER THAN THE WASTEWATER SIDE OF 2528. WE DO HAVE SOME EXISTING CONNECTIONS THAT ARE PROVIDED WATER SERVICE, BUT NOT SEWER DUE TO HAVING THEIR OWN PRIVATE SEPTIC SYSTEM. THE ASSUMPTION MOVING FORWARD, EVERYBODY WHO TIES ON WITH THE WATER METER WILL ALSO TIE INTO THE SEWER SERVICE. SO WALKING THROUGH THE THE EQUATION NOW WE HAVE ALL OF OUR INPUTS. YOU CAN SEE OUR TOTAL IMPACT FEE ELIGIBLE COSTS ON THE WATER SIDE, THAT 23,150,000 DIVIDED BY 2160 GROWTH IN SERVICE UNITS. THAT GIVES A TOTAL NUMBER OF $10,718 PER SERVICE UNIT. [00:15:06] APPLY THE 50% CREDIT. WE COME DOWN TO $5,359 ON THE WATER SIDE. SAME PROCESS ON THE WASTEWATER SIDE OF THINGS. THAT YIELDS A $2,801 CHARGE FOR WASTEWATER. THOUGH WE LOOK AT THE DIFFERENT METER SIZES, THOSE SERVICE UNIT EQUIVALENTS THAT TABLE THE INPUTS THERE. SO WE HAVE OUR WATER WASTEWATER COMBINED AT 8160 FOR A THREE QUARTER INCH METER. YOU CAN SEE HOW THE HOW THE FEES GO UP BASED ON THE SERVICE UNIT EQUIVALENT FOR THE LARGER METER SIZES. SO THAT THAT THAT WHOLE SPAN OF 8160 FOR THE THREE QUARTER INCH METER, IF YOU WERE TO PUT IN A SIX INCH METER. THE FEES COULD BE AS HIGH AS $380,886. CAN YOU HELP ME? OR WAIT. MAYBE IT'S A QUESTION FOR YOU. OUR GENERAL HOUSE IN WESTLAKE. WHAT'S A METER? WHAT'S THE METER SIZE? THREE QUARTERS OF ONE INCH THREE QUARTERS OF ONE. WHO HAS SIX INCHES? IT'D BE LARGE. LARGE CAMPUSES MIGHT HAVE SIX INCHES, BUT A LOT OF TIMES THEY DON'T EVEN HAVE SIX INCHES. THEY'LL BE SMALLER. THEY'RE FOUR AND FIVE INCH. HOW WOULD ACTUALLY KNOW EXACTLY WHAT THAT NUMBER IS FOR SOME OF OUR LARGE CAMPUSES? BECAUSE YOU REPLACED THEM THIS LAST YEAR. OKAY. THANKS. GOOD AFTERNOON. EDDIE HAAS I PREPARED THE ROADWAY COMPONENT OF THE IMPACT FEE PROGRAM. METHODOLOGICALLY FOLLOWING THE WATER WASTEWATER, THE ROAD CIPS ROUTED IN YOUR MASTER THOROUGHFARE PLAN. PROJECTS THAT WERE IDENTIFIED AS ARTERIAL CLASS OR COLLECTOR CLASS FACILITIES ARE INCLUDED IN THE PROGRAM. 21 NEW PROJECTS WERE IDENTIFIED FOR THE PROGRAM. THESE ARE NEW PROJECTS BEING ROAD WIDENING, NEW ROADS ALTOGETHER, BUT ONLY THE NEW LANES THAT ARE BEING ADDED IN. SO NEW CAPACITY ADDED INTO THE PROGRAM. AND THE 21 PROJECTS PROVIDES CAPACITY A LITTLE OVER 19,900 VEHICLE MILES OF CAPACITY INTO THE PROGRAM. THE FORECASTED GROWTH IN WESTLAKE IS A TEN YEAR DEMAND OF ABOUT 48,600. THEREFORE, ALL THE CAPACITY THAT'S PROVIDED WILL BE CONSUMED OVER THAT TEN YEAR GROWTH. THAT 48,000 NUMBER IS ROOTED IN THE LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS. WE LOOKED AT POPULATION AND EMPLOYMENT, THE NET GROWTH FROM 25 TO 35, AND THEN THE SERVICE UNIT GENERATION SPECIFICALLY FOR RESIDENTIAL, OFFICE, COMMERCIAL AND RETAIL. AND SO THOSE THAT'S WHAT GENERATES THE 48,500. ALL THAT DOCUMENTATION IS IN THE REPORT, APPENDIX C OR TABLE 3-8 IN THE REPORT. THE REPORT ALSO CONTAINS AN ENUMERATION OF THE PROJECTS BY NAME, THE LIMITS THE NUMBER OF LANES TO BE ADDED INTO THE PROGRAM. THE INDIVIDUAL COST COSTING WERE UNDERTAKEN THROUGH INDIVIDUAL COST ESTIMATES. UNIT COST APPROACH BASED ON 12 MONTH AVERAGES, ROLLING AVERAGES AND OR BID PRICES THAT WE RECEIVE FROM THE TOWN. SO THESE NUMBERS REFLECT CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING RIGHT OF WAY REALLY ANY COST TO PUT THE APARTMENTS ON THE GROUND. THE COST OF DEBT SERVICE IS INCLUDED INTO THE PROGRAM. SO THOSE 21 PROJECTS TOTAL ABOUT $100 MILLION OF COST FOR CONSIDERATION, SIMILAR TO THE WATER WASTEWATER. THE ALL OF THAT COST IS ATTRIBUTABLE TO NEW GROWTH. THEREFORE IT CAN BE CONSIDERED IN THE CALCULATION. SO IT'S THE COST OF NECESSITATED CAPACITY DIVIDED BY THOSE SERVICE UNITS OF GROWTH OF 48,000 RESULTS IN A COST PER VEHICLE MILE OF 2068, GIVE THAT 50% CREDIT. THAT RESULTS IN 1034. PER VEHICLE MILE, AND BECAUSE TRAFFIC GENERATES DIFFERENTLY BASED ON LAND USE TYPES, THERE'S WHAT'S CALLED A LAND USE EQUIVALENCY TABLE THAT STAFF WILL USE TO MEASURE DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS WITHIN THE TOWN, THOSE THAT THEY RECEIVE BY LAND USE TYPES. WE HAVE KIND OF A BLOW UP THERE IN THE LOWER LEFT OF THAT SCREEN DEPICTING THE RESIDENTIAL CATEGORIES. SO THE COLUMN IN THE FAR RIGHT IS WHAT'S CALLED THE SERVICE UNIT GENERATION, BASED ON AN INDEPENDENT VARIABLE, WHETHER IT'S DWELLING UNITS FOR RESIDENTIAL OR GENERALLY ON A PER THOUSAND SQUARE FOOT OF NONRESIDENTIAL TYPE DEVELOPMENT. SO THEY'LL USE THAT SERVICE UNIT GENERATION TIMES THE THE COST PER SERVICE UNIT OR THAT 1034 IF THE DESIRE IS TO COLLECT THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE TO CALCULATE THE FEE. AND SO BY WAY OF STEPS DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL COMES IN, THEY'LL ASSESS HOW MUCH QUANTITY, THE SIZE OF THE DEVELOPMENT, 250 DWELLING UNITS OR 100,000 SQUARE FOOT OF SHOPPING CENTER, THE SERVICE UNIT GENERATE FROM THE EQUIVALENCY TABLE RESULTS IN DEVELOPMENT VEHICLE MILES TIMES THAT COST PER SERVICE UNIT, OR THE COLLECTION RATE YOU ALL DECIDE TO TO IMPLEMENT AS POLICY RESULTS IN THE IMPACT FEE. [00:20:03] OKAY, SO BY WAY OF WALKING THROUGH THAT, IF YOU WERE IN THE CASE OF A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE WANTING TO COLLECT THAT MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE, IT'D BE ONE DWELLING UNIT TIMES 3.7 VEHICLE MILES. THAT'S A SERVICE UNIT. GENERATION FOR ONE ONE DWELLING UNIT RESULTS IN 3.7 TIMES A COLLECTION RATE. IF YOU ALL ADOPTED THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE 1034, THE IMPACT FEE WOULD BE $3,825. YES, SIR. I JUST NEED A BIT MORE CLARIFICATION ON THE SERVICE UNITS, BECAUSE YOU THREW UP A GRAPH THERE THAT HAD 48,665 SERVICE UNITS. HOW IS THAT 48,665 CALCULATED? THIS IS ABOUT FOUR SLIDES BACK FROM THE LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS. WE LOOKED AT THE NET INCREASE IN POPULATION YEAR 2025 THROUGH 2035. THERE'S A NET INCREASE IN PERSONS PER DWELLING UNIT. WE'RE ABLE TO DEFINE THE NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS FROM THE NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS TIMES THE SERVICE UNIT GENERATION. WE WERE ABLE TO PROJECT OUT A FORECAST OF HOW MANY VEHICLE MILES OF GROWTH WOULD BE ANTICIPATED FROM THE LUA, AND THEN SIMILARLY SIMILARLY FOR THE WATER WASTEWATER. I'M SORRY FOR THE NONRESIDENTIAL COMPONENT. APPENDIX C CONTAINS THE NET INCREASE IN, WE GENERALLY CATEGORIZE NONRESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IN TERMS OF INDUSTRIAL, COMMERCIAL, OR OFFICE. THAT NET INCREASE IN SQUARE FOOTAGE TIMES SQUARE FOOTAGE PER EMPLOYEE. WE'RE ABLE TO QUANTIFY NUMBER NUMBER OF SQUARE FEET OF DEVELOPMENT AND USING THAT SAME EQUIVALENCY TABLE, ABLE TO FORECAST THE NUMBER OF DEVELOPMENT UNITS SO THAT WE'RE ABLE TO QUANTIFY THAT FULL 48600, 406665 OKAY. THAT BECOMES OUR TOTAL. IF YOU HAVE IT'S IT'S STILL A LITTLE CONFUSING FOR ME THOUGH, BECAUSE IF A SINGLE FAMILY UNIT GENERATES 3.7 SERVICE UNITS, AM I UNDERSTAND THAT CORRECTLY? THAT'S CORRECT. SO I MEAN, WHAT ARE THE WHAT ARE THE BIG ITEMS THAT ARE GENERATING ALL THOSE SERVICE UNITS? BECAUSE 200 200 SINGLE FAMILY UNITS, WHICH YOU HAD IN THAT PREVIOUS CHART, WOULD GENERATE ON THE ORDER OF 700 SERVICE UNITS. HOW ARE WE GETTING TO 48,000? WHAT ARE WE EXPECTING? IT'S THE DAYTIME COMMERCIAL GROWTH. SO THAT'S CALCULATED. SO IT'S NOT JUST THE SINGLE WE HAVE. THAT'S CORRECT. WE HAVE ADDED POPULATION OVER THE TEN YEAR WINDOW, 1396 PERSONS, WHICH IS ABOUT 439 ADDED DWELLING UNITS OVER THE TEN YEARS TIMES 3.7 RESULTS IN 1624 VEHICLE MILES. ON THE NONRESIDENTIAL SIDE, IN TERMS OF RETAIL, WE FORECASTED ABOUT 2509 EMPLOYEES. FOR RETAIL, THAT TRANSLATES TO A LITTLE OVER 2,000,000FT² OF OFFICE OR COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT TIMES THAT SERVICE UNIT GENERATION. THAT'S 4900. THE SERVICE OR OFFICE IS THE BIGGIE. WE'VE GOT ABOUT 13,900 EMPLOYEES TIMES THAT. THAT RESULTS IN ABOUT 6.9 ALMOST 7,000,000FT² OF OF OFFICE DEVELOPMENT TIMES THAT SERVICE UNIT GENERATION OF 5.99. THAT'S 41,000 VEHICLE MILES RIGHT THERE. YES. THAT'S WHAT I WAS TRYING TO GET AT. SO IT SEEMS LIKE IT'S 3% IS BASED ON THE RESIDENTIAL GROWTH. AND EVERYTHING ELSE IS BASED ON THE RETAIL AND COMMERCIAL. HOW DOES THAT GROWTH FACTOR INTO THE WATER AND WASTEWATER? THOSE ARE THE SEPARATE CALCULATIONS ALTOGETHER. UNDERSTOOD. BUT I GUESS WHAT I'M WONDERING IS THE WATER AND WASTEWATER USAGE WAS IT SEEMED TO BE BASED ON RESIDENTIAL GROWTH ON METERS. RIGHT. THEY QUANTIFIED THE NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS, THEREFORE THE RESULTANT OR THE ASSOCIATED METERS. THAT'S RIGHT. THE SIZE IS GOING TO BE NECESSITATED BY GROWTH IN THE SIZE OF METERS. HOW WE CAPTURE THAT? BECAUSE IF YOU LOOK AT THE CHARLES SCHWAB, THEY'VE GOT 3 TO 4 FOUR INCH METERS. SO THEY'RE GOING TO BE PAYING SIGNIFICANTLY MORE BECAUSE OF THE WATER USAGE THAT'S ON THAT CAMPUS, AS OPPOSED TO A SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING. IT'S ONLY A THREE QUARTER INCH LINE. YEAH, I GUESS I GET THAT. I GUESS I'M A LITTLE, JUST A LITTLE CONFUSED WHY THE AMOUNT OF GROWTH IN ROAD IMPACT OR THE AMOUNT OF IMPACT FEES ASSOCIATED WITH ROAD IMPACT. RIGHT. WHICH WE'RE CALCULATING TO BE UPWARDS OF $100 MILLION OF COST. SO THE FEES ARE SIGNIFICANT COMPARED TO THE WATER AND WASTEWATER. I WOULD PRESUME IT WOULD BE COMMENSURATE. I WOULD I WOULD EXPECT THE WATER AND WASTEWATER TO BE PRETTY HIGH AS WELL. BUT YEAH, SO THE ROAD COMPONENT IS ACTUALLY A LITTLE BIT HIGHER. YOU'LL SEE THOSE IN THE BENCHMARKING CHARTS THAT WE HAVE. AND REMEMBER THAT TRAFFIC GENERATES DIFFERENTLY BY LAND USE TYPE. RIGHT. RESIDENTIAL GENERATES A LOT FEWER TRIPS THAN AN OFFICE VERSUS RETAIL VERSUS DAYCARE VERSUS LIGHTING. SO THERE'S A VARIETY OF FACTORS. AND SO THE THE EQUIVALENCY TABLE THAT WE'VE PREPARED IS PREDICATED ON KNOWN DATA OF TRIP GENERATION BY TRIP TYPE. THIS IS FROM IT INSTITUTE OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS, 11TH EDITION. SO WE HAVE TRIP RATE DATA VEHICLES PM PEAK HOUR AND WE HAVE TRIP LENGTH DATA. A TRIP LENGTH ASSOCIATED WITH THE KIND OF TRIP THAT IT IS. HOME BASE, WORK HOME, NON-WORK NON HOME BASED TRIPS. SO WE'RE ABLE TO THAT'S WHAT THAT SERVICE UNIT IS TAILORED SPECIFICALLY TO WESTLAKE. SO IF YOU'RE GOING TO THE POINT OF WELL, WHAT IF A DEVELOPER DOESN'T, WHAT IF THEY FEEL THAT THEY GENERATE TRAFFIC DIFFERENTLY FROM WHAT'S PRESENTED IN ITE? [00:25:09] WELL, THE CITY ENGINEER CAN CONSIDER INFORMATION THAT THAT AN APPLICANT MIGHT HAVE FOR THEIR TYPE OF LAND USE. OKAY. SO WE HAVE KNOWN DATA THAT'S PUBLISHED FOR IT. AND SO THAT THAT IS THE ROUTE OF THE DATA AT THE FROM A TRIP GENERATION PERSPECTIVE, THE TRIP LENGTH INFORMATION IS ROOTED IN DATA FROM THE COG TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL. THE REGIONAL MODEL ON TYPICAL TRIP LENGTHS BY TRIP TYPE. OKAY. SO AGAIN THIS IS THIS IS A MAXIMUM. THAT'S CORRECT. CORRECT. SO YEAH. SO IN THIS SCENARIO. [INAUDIBLE] NEGOTIATION AT SOME POINT. I'M SORRY. IT'S SUBJECT TO SOME NEGOTIATION DURING DEVELOPMENT. DURING DEVELOPMENT? THAT'S CORRECT. THE MAXIMUM. RIGHT. IF YOU ALL DECIDE THAT IT'S APPROPRIATE TO COLLECT THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE THAT 50%, THAT'S WITHIN YOUR PURVIEW. THE TOWN, YOUR RESIDENTS ARE ALREADY GOING TO PICK UP THE OTHER HALF. RIGHT. IF YOU DECIDE THAT MAYBE 40% OF MAX OR 10% OF MAX, WHATEVER IS MORE APPROPRIATE. WELL, SOMEONE'S GOING TO BE PICKING UP THE DELTA ON THAT. WE'VE NEVER HAD AN IMPACT FEE. YEAH, FOR THE RESIDENTS. AND EVERYONE WHO HAS BEEN HERE HAS BEEN PICKING UP THE GROWTH 100% OF IT. THAT'S CORRECT. WAY TO MAKE RESIDENTS HAPPIER BUT TO PUT GROWTH WHERE GROWTH IS. WHAT WERE THE WORDS YOU USED ANDREW. I MEAN IT'S GROWTH PAYING FOR GROWTH. GROWTH PAYING FOR. AND HE WAS CORRECT IN THE DEFINITION, THE IMPACT FEE PROGRAM IS PREDICATED ON NEW DEVELOPMENT PAYING A PORTION OF THAT. THAT'S UP TO THAT CEILING. THAT'S CORRECT. BECAUSE, YOU KNOW, THESE DEVELOPMENTS ARE ONLY GOING TO PAY THEIR FAIR SHARE. THE MORE CAPACITY THEY CONSUME, THE HIGHER THE FEE. IT'S ONLY FAIR THAT THEY'RE PAYING NO MORE OR NO LESS. SO THAT'S WHERE THAT CEILING IS. OKAY. AND IF YOU WILL DECIDE BY POLICY THAT YOU YOU FEEL IT'S APPROPRIATE TO COLLECT SOMETHING LESS, THAT'S WITHIN YOUR PURVIEW. WE'RE JUST IDENTIFYING WHAT THAT CEILING IS. THE NEGOTIATION OF IT IS IN AN HOUR. THAT'S CORRECT. EVEN IF YOU WERE TO ADOPT THE MAX ON THE OTHER SIDE AS PART OF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS, THERE COULD BE OTHER THINGS GOING ON AS PART OF THAT FINAL DEAL. OKAY. PERFECT. SO I WAS IN THE MIDDLE OF THIS CALCULATION. THE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, THE COLLECTION, THE SERVICE UNIT GENERATION, THE IMPACT FEE OR THE COST PER SERVICE UNIT IS THE IMPACT FEE, YOU ADD THEM ALL UP. GENERALLY, IT'S AROUND 11,900. SOMEWHERE AROUND 12,000 WOULD BE THE COST FOR A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE. WHEN YOU COMBINE THE THE THREE COMPONENTS TOGETHER. OKAY, SO WHAT WE DID WITH THE ADVISORY, I'M SORRY, WE WE'RE GOING TO SHOW THIS IN TERMS OF BENCHMARKING HERE, BUT WE WANTED TO PROVIDE JUST KIND OF A LAYOUT OF WHAT DIFFERENT TYPES OF DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY WOULD BE GENERATING BASED ON DIFFERENT SIZES. WE HAVE A MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT. WE HAD A QUALITY RESTAURANT, WE HAD A RETAIL SHOPPING CENTER, AND WE HAD A CORPORATE CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS. AND YOU CAN SEE THE DIFFERENT SIZES 25, 25 UNIT MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT, 5000FT² OF QUALITY RESTAURANT, 25,000 SQUARE FOOT SHOPPING CENTER, UNDER 1000 SQUARE FOOT OF CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS AND WITH THEIR UNIT EQUIVALENT AND THE MAXIMUM, YOU CAN SEE WHAT THE DIFFERENT IMPACT FEES WOULD RESULT IN. SO YOU START THINKING, HOLY SMOKE, $567,000 FOR A 100,000 SQUARE FOOT OF OF CORPORATE. WELL, IF YOU THINK ABOUT THE IMPACT THAT THEY'RE PUTTING ON THE NETWORK, THAT IS THE ACTUAL IMPACT. IT'S A COST TO THAT. OKAY. AND THAT IS ONLY ROADWAY. THAT'S CORRECT. AND SO THE LOGICAL QUESTION MIGHT BE WELL I'M A DEVELOPER AND I PUT DOWN THE ROAD. I SHOULD GET A, I SHOULD GET SOME KIND OF CREDIT. AND THAT'S THE WAY THE PROGRAM WORKS. DEVELOPER PUTS DOWN A ROADWAY. THE COST OF THAT ROAD CREDIT. THE CREDIT, THAT AGAINST THE IMPACT FEE. AND THAT'S HOW YOU SQUARE AWAY FROM THERE. OKAY. OKAY. SO THE BENCHMARKING CHARTS, WE LOOKED THIS WAS TO KIND OF HELP THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE. AND NOW SUBSEQUENTLY YOU ALL. WHAT ARE OTHER COMMUNITIES THAT HAVE IMPACT FEE PROGRAMS AND BASED ON THEIR CURRENT COLLECTION RATES? WHAT IS THE WHAT ARE THE ACTUAL FEES? PER ORDINANCES. SO WE LOOKED AT SEVERAL PEER CITIES AND YOU SEE THEM LISTED ALONG THE BOTTOM. PROSPER, COLLEYVILLE, FLOWER MOUNDS, NORTH LAKE, KELLER, FORT WORTH, JUSTIN HAZLETT, SOUTH LAKE AND ROANOKE. TROPHY CLUB DOESN'T HAVE IMPACT FEE PROGRAM, SO WE DIDN'T LIST THEM. SO BUT IF YOU WERE TO LOOK AT WHAT IS THE COST OF A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE PER THEIR ORDINANCE, PROSPER THE IMPACT FEE IS 29,700 AND SO ON HERE. WESTLAKE. IF YOU WERE TO COLLECT THAT MAXIMUM, THAT WOULD BE 16,200. SO WHAT WE HAVE ALSO IS THE BREAKDOWN OF THE ROAD IN ORANGE, THE WASTEWATER IN GREEN AND THE WATER IN BLUE. [00:30:03] WE'RE ALSO SHOWING THAT PASS THROUGH COMPONENT THE FORT WORTH. THAT'S THE PART THAT'S BUILT INTO YEAH. ANDREW'S CALCULATION. SO, YEAH, THAT THAT KIND OF HATCHED BLUE. LIGHT BLUE. THERE IS THE FORT WORTH PASS THROUGH ON THE WATER SIDE. BECAUSE Y'ALL RECEIVE WATER FROM FORT WORTH, YOU HAVE TO PAY THE WATER IMPACT. THAT'S A FEE THAT YOU'VE ALREADY BEEN CHARGING. YOU'VE BEEN CHARGING THIS BECAUSE THEY THEY SHARE THE SAME RATE OF THAT WATER IMPACT FEE WITH ALL 30 PLUS OF THEIR WHOLESALE CUSTOMER. THEY PASS IT THROUGH SAME RATE ACROSS THE BOARD. SO ALL THE ONES YOU SEE THAT THE NORTH LAKE, KELLER, HAZLETT, SOUTHLAKE, ROANOKE. THEY ALL PAY THE SAME FEE TO FORT WORTH. HOW WOULD YOU JUST MAKE SURE ALL OF THESE TOWNS AND CITIES ARE SHOWING? THEY HAVE IMPACT FEES, RIGHT? THESE ARE WHAT ARE LISTED IN THIS IN THIS CHART. THAT IS CORRECT. AND SO THIS IS THEIR ORDINANCE. AND ALSO IT'S IMPORTANT TO NOTE WITHIN EACH COMMUNITY YOU SEE A YEAR UNDERNEATH EACH ONE. AND SO BY LAW IF YOU WERE TO ADOPT THIS PROGRAM THE PROGRAM HAS TO BE REVIEWED AND UPDATED AT LEAST EVERY FIVE YEARS. OKAY. SO THE REASON WE'RE SHOWING THE THE DATES HERE, COLLEYVILLE IS 2022 FLOWER MOUND 2021. SO ON. THEY'RE ANTICIPATING AN UPDATE. AND YOU CAN ANTICIPATE THAT WITH CONSTRUCTION COSTS CONTINUING TO GROW UP, THEIR NUMBERS MIGHT GO UP COMMENSURATELY. NO DOUBT. YEAH OKAY OKAY. SO THIS IS A THIS WAS A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL WITH A THREE QUARTER INCH METER. I GUESS THOSE ARE THE METERS YOU'VE HAD IN THE PAST. MOST NEW RESIDENTIAL WILL BE ON A ONE INCH METER HERE IN THE TOWN. AND SO I WANTED TO SHOW UP WITH WHAT THAT WOULD BE, AND THAT WOULD BE ABOUT 24,500. AND WE'RE, IN IF YOU'RE LOOKING WELL, HOW DOES WESTLAKE COMPARE TO SOME OF THESE OTHER COMMUNITIES KIND OF LAND? MORE OR LESS IN THE MIDDLE, IF YOU WILL? OKAY. A COUPLE OF THOSE SCENARIOS THAT I IDENTIFIED FOR THE ROAD COMPONENT, THE 25 UNIT MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT THAT WOULD BE RESIDENTIAL ON TOP WITH SOME LEVEL OF COMMERCIAL ON THE LOWER LEVEL. OKAY. SO THAT IMPACT FEE FOR THAT TYPE DEVELOPMENT AND FLOWER MOUND WOULD BE ABOUT $270,000 HERE IN WESTLAKE. IF YOU ADOPTED THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE, THAT WOULD BE $102,000. SOUTH LAKE, I DON'T THINK THAT'S CORRECT. 2018 I THINK THEIR LAST PROGRAM WAS 2023 WHEN THEY LAST UPDATED IT, BUT THEY'RE THEY'RE DUE UP FOR AN UPDATE HERE SOON. SORRY. CHECK THEIR ORDINANCE. I THINK THEY'RE IN THE PROCESS. AT LEAST IT COULD BE SHORTER. IT'S GOT TO BE AT LEAST. BUT BY LAW, YOU HAVE TO DO IT AT LEAST. YEAH. SO? YEAH. SO IT SEEMS. YEAH. IT SEEMS A LITTLE LONG. SO MAYBE THEY, THEY ADOPTED A NO CHANGE. MAYBE SOMEWHERE IN THERE KEPT THE RATES THE SAME MAYBE. BUT THAT'S THEIR LAST ORDINANCE. 5000 SQUARE FOOT QUALITY RESTAURANT. THIS IS KIND OF A SIT DOWN, YOU KNOW, KIND OF AN HOUR, HOUR LONG TYPE, NOT A HIGH TURNOVER, LIKE A, LIKE A CHILI'S OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT, BUT MORE OF A QUALITY, QUALITY SCENARIO. SO THAT THAT IMPACT FEE WOULD BE 65,000 HERE IN, IN THE TOWN. AND YOU CAN SEE SOME OF YOUR PEER CITIES HERE HOW HIGH THAT FEE IS IN OTHER COMMUNITIES. 25,000 SQUARE FOOT OF SHOPPING CENTER. THE IMPACT FEE HERE IN THE TOWN, IF ADOPTED AT THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE, WOULD BE 1000. THEN THE OTHER COMMUNITIES, OBVIOUSLY YOU CAN SEE RANGING FROM A HIGH OF 500,000 TO A LOW OF 37. SO ROANOKE DOESN'T HAVE ROSE. SO THAT'S IN FACT IT LOOKS LIKE THEY ONLY HAVE WATER. MAY NOT EVEN HAVE. NOR HAS IT. YEAH. IN THE CASE OF SOMETHING LIKE KELLER. PROBABLY BETTER BECAUSE JASON. WHY WOULD THERE ROAD IMPACT FEES. [INAUDIBLE] THOSE ARE THE, SO THE 75%, SO THOSE PERCENTAGES INDICATE THAT THEY MUST HAVE DONE A CREDIT ANALYSIS AND THEY'RE COLLECTING AT A HIGHER RATE POLICY DECISION. YOU'RE ALSO GOING TO IF I MAY, YOU'RE ALSO GOING TO SEE NORTH LAKE, THEIR POPULATION IS SCHEDULED TO MORE THAN DOUBLE. THEY'RE GOING TO BE WELL OVER 45,000 PEOPLE WITHIN THE NEXT 5 TO 10 YEARS. SO A GREAT DEAL OF THIS HAS TO DO WITH YOUR GROWTH, RIGHT. SO THEY HAVE A HUGE AMOUNT OF GROWTH POTENTIAL, AND THEIR SQUARE MILES ARE A LOT LARGER THAN THE SQUARE MILES OF THE OF THE CITY LIMITS FOR FOR US. KELLER IS HUGE AS WELL, SO THERE'S MORE ROOM FOR ALL THAT GROWTH, WHICH IN TURN MEANS A HIGHER IMPACT FEE BECAUSE THERE'S GOING TO BE MORE GROWTH NEED OUT THERE. THE FINAL SCENARIO THAT WE HAD WAS THAT 100,000 SQUARE FOOT OF CORPORATE CAMPUS, AND WE HAD ASSUMED A FOUR INCH METER TO SERVE THAT. [00:35:06] SO OBVIOUSLY, IF YOU COLLECTED THE MAX IN THE THREE DIFFERENT COMPONENTS, THAT IMPACT FEE WOULD BE 836,000. AND YOU CAN SEE WHERE YOU ARE RELATIVE TO SOME OF YOUR PEER CITIES. NOW WE PUT A STAR AND ASTERISK BY NORTHLAKE. THEY DON'T HAVE AN OFFICE CATEGORY. THEY HAVE COMMERCIAL. SO WHEN I CALLED AND ASKED THEM, HEY, PRETEND I'M THE OFFICE CORPORATE CAMPUS COMING TO TOWN. WHAT? WHAT SERVICE UNIT GENERATION? THEY SAID PROBABLY BE UNDER THE COMMERCIAL CATEGORY. SO WE PUT AN ASTERISK BEHIND IT, BECAUSE MY PRESUMPTION WOULD BE I THINK I MIGHT CHALLENGE THAT ANYWAY, THAT UNDER THE CURRENT ORDINANCE, THAT WOULD BE IN THE 2.3 MILLION FOR THAT TYPE SCENARIO. SO THIS MIGHT HELP YOU ALL IN YOUR DECISION MAKING PROCESS IF YOU'RE CONTEMPLATING WHAT LEVEL TO CHARGE THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE, AS ANDREW MENTIONED EARLIER. THEY RECOMMENDED COLLECTING A MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE FOR ALL THREE COMPONENTS. SO WITH THAT, THAT IS THE CONCLUSION OF MY PRESENTATION. REALLY THE ACTION BEFORE YOU SHOULD YOU DECIDE TO ADOPT IMPACT FEES WOULD BE TO ACCEPT THE LUA. YOU'VE ALREADY ACCEPTED THE LUA AND THE CIP, BUT IT'S THE COST FOR SERVICING THE IMPACT FEE CALCULATION THAT COST PER SERVICE UNIT. AND THEN ULTIMATELY IT'S FOR THE ORDINANCE. IT'S THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE ADOPTION OF THE ORDINANCE, THE PROGRAM, AND THEN YOUR ORDINANCE COLLECTION RATES THAT I'M HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MIGHT HAVE FOR COMMENT. I THINK THE WORK THAT YOU DID WAS EXCELLENT. VERY. NOT ONLY WAS IT COMPREHENSIVE, BUT YOU GAVE US A LOT OF INFORMATION [INAUDIBLE]. YOU TOOK COMPREHENSIVE, DIFFICULT UNDERSTAND INFORMATION AND PUT IT INTO LAYMAN'S TERMS. IT'S THERE'S A LITTLE MATH INVOLVED, THE TECHNICAL SIDE, BUT WHEN WE GET DOWN TO THE, THE CONSIDERATION THAT'S WITHIN YOUR, YOUR POLICY CONSIDERATION, THAT'S ALL. THAT'S WITH PURE POLICY. SO THANK YOU FOR THAT. YEAH I'LL ECHO THAT. EXCELLENT ANALYSIS. THANK YOU. SO ANSWER HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MIGHT HAVE. WE'LL NEED TO OPEN AND CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. OKAY I'M GOING TO OPEN UP A PUBLIC HEARING. IS THERE ANYONE THAT WISHES TO SPEAK? I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. [C.1. Discuss, consider and act to approve and adopt Ordinance No.1028 amending the Town of Westlake Code of Ordinances by amending Chapter 82 titled "Subdivisions", to establish Article XV. entitled "Impact Fees"; establishing water, wastewater and roadway capital impact fees; establishing a maximum allowable impact fee per service unit; establishing procedures for the assessment, computation, collection, deposit, refund, expenditure and general administration of said impact fees; establishing an appeal procedure; establishing an effective date of August 25, 2025; providing for penalties; providing a severability clause; and finding and determining that the meeting at which this Ordinance is adopted is open to the Public as required by law.] WE'LL NOW GO TO AGENDA ITEM C-1 DISCUSS, CONSIDER AND ACT TO APPROVE AND ADOPT ORDINANCE NUMBER 1028. AMENDING THE TOWN OF WESTLAKE CODE OF ORDINANCES BY AMENDING CHAPTER 82 TITLE SUBDIVISIONS TO ESTABLISH ARTICLE 15 ENTITLED IMPACT FEES ESTABLISHING WATER, WASTEWATER AND ROADWAY CAPITAL IMPACT FEES. ESTABLISHING A MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE IMPACT FEE PER SERVICE UNIT. ESTABLISHING PROCEDURES FOR THE ASSESSMENT, COMPUTATION, COLLECTION, DEPOSIT, REFUND EXPENDITURE AND GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE OF SAID IMPACT FEES. ESTABLISHING AN APPEAL PROCEDURE. ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF AUGUST 25TH, 2025, PROVIDING FOR PENALTIES, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY CLAUSE AND FINDING AND DETERMINED THAT THE MEETING AT WHICH THIS ORDINANCE IS ADOPTED IS OPEN TO PUBLIC, AS REQUIRED BY LAW. CAN I GET A MOTION TO APPROVE ORDINANCE NUMBER 1028? SO MOVED. CAN I GET A SECOND? SECOND. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. ANY OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. MAYOR, I JUST WANT TO THANK THE COUNCIL FOR THE SPECIAL MEETING ABOUT GETTING THIS SCHEDULED AND DONE PRIOR TO THE SEPTEMBER 1ST DEADLINE, AND ALSO TO [INAUDIBLE], WHO SPED UP THEIR PROCESS BY ABOUT FOUR MONTHS IN ORDER TO TO MAKE THIS HAPPEN AS WELL. AND YOU CAN IMAGINE WE'RE NOT THE ONLY MUNICIPALITY THEY'RE DOING THIS FOR. I THINK THERE'S PROBABLY 6 OR 8 MORE THAT THEY'RE HAVING TO DO THIS OVER THE NEXT WEEK OR SO TO, TO GET ALL THIS DONE PRIOR TO SEPTEMBER 1ST DEADLINE. YEAH. NO DOUBT. WE WANT TO THANK THEM AND THANK THE COUNCIL FOR THIS CONSIDERATION. YEAH. THANK YOU, WADE AND YOUR TEAM FOR PUTTING US TOGETHER. YEAH NO DOUBT. AND YOU GUYS THANK YOU. WADE YOUR TEAM THANK YOU AGAIN. AND TO COUNCIL IN ALL HONESTY YOU KNOW OVER THE LAST YEAR PLUS WE REALLY ARE WE'RE EVOLVING OUR TOWN TO WHERE IT NEEDS TO BE. WE'VE BEEN BEHIND. WE'VE SAID THAT WE'VE WE HAVE A LOT OF THINGS WE NEED TO DO. BUT THIS IS A HUGE STEP FOR US GOING FORWARD. ANOTHER PIECE OF THE PUZZLE FOR US TO PUT TOGETHER TO MAKE US THE TOWN THAT WE ALL WANT. SO I APPRECIATE ALL OF COUNCIL. WITH THAT SAID, IT'S NOT A RECORD, BUT IT'S A PRETTY GOOD MEETING. ADJOURNED THE MEETING AT 4:39. 4:40. DARN. THANK YOU ALL. * This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.